我们真的需要一个关于阅读障碍的新定义吗？评论。

IF 2.1 3区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Annals of Dyslexia Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1007/s11881-024-00305-y

Maggie Snowling, Charles Hulme

{"title":"我们真的需要一个关于阅读障碍的新定义吗？评论。","authors":"Maggie Snowling, Charles Hulme","doi":"10.1007/s11881-024-00305-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We provide a commentary on current debates about the definition of dyslexia. We agree with others that dyslexia is best thought of as a dimensional disorder with the best established causal risk factor being a deficit in phonological processing. Dyslexia is particularly common in children from families with a history of dyslexia and in children with preschool language difficulties. We argue that definitions may differ depending upon their purpose. Traditional discrepancy definitions may be useful for research purposes, but when considering the provision of educational services discrepancy definitions are not useful since all children with reading difficulties require reading intervention regardless of their level of IQ.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"74 3","pages":"355 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do we really need a new definition of dyslexia? A commentary\",\"authors\":\"Maggie Snowling, Charles Hulme\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11881-024-00305-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We provide a commentary on current debates about the definition of dyslexia. We agree with others that dyslexia is best thought of as a dimensional disorder with the best established causal risk factor being a deficit in phonological processing. Dyslexia is particularly common in children from families with a history of dyslexia and in children with preschool language difficulties. We argue that definitions may differ depending upon their purpose. Traditional discrepancy definitions may be useful for research purposes, but when considering the provision of educational services discrepancy definitions are not useful since all children with reading difficulties require reading intervention regardless of their level of IQ.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"volume\":\"74 3\",\"pages\":\"355 - 362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-024-00305-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-024-00305-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对当前关于阅读障碍定义的争论进行了评论。我们同意其他人的观点，即阅读障碍最好被视为一种多维障碍，而语音处理缺陷是最确定的致病风险因素。诵读困难在有诵读困难病史家庭的儿童和有学前语言障碍的儿童中尤为常见。我们认为，不同的定义可能会有不同的目的。传统的差异定义可能对研究目的有用，但在考虑提供教育服务时，差异定义就没有用了，因为所有有阅读困难的儿童，无论其智商水平如何，都需要阅读干预。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Do we really need a new definition of dyslexia? A commentary

We provide a commentary on current debates about the definition of dyslexia. We agree with others that dyslexia is best thought of as a dimensional disorder with the best established causal risk factor being a deficit in phonological processing. Dyslexia is particularly common in children from families with a history of dyslexia and in children with preschool language difficulties. We argue that definitions may differ depending upon their purpose. Traditional discrepancy definitions may be useful for research purposes, but when considering the provision of educational services discrepancy definitions are not useful since all children with reading difficulties require reading intervention regardless of their level of IQ.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

8.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.