{"title":"最高上诉法院禁止远程精神病评估:通往地狱的道路总是由善意铺就的","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A recent judgment handed down by the Court of Cassation prohibits the use of telecommunications means to carry out psychiatric assessments. This ban can be welcomed in that it makes it possible to offer quality expertise throughout France, but on the contrary, it arouses fear given the low number of experts and their uniform distribution across the territory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2024 188","pages":"Pages 96-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La cour de cassation interdit les expertises psychiatriques à distance : l’enfer est toujours pavé de bonnes intentions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A recent judgment handed down by the Court of Cassation prohibits the use of telecommunications means to carry out psychiatric assessments. This ban can be welcomed in that it makes it possible to offer quality expertise throughout France, but on the contrary, it arouses fear given the low number of experts and their uniform distribution across the territory.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"volume\":\"2024 188\",\"pages\":\"Pages 96-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
La cour de cassation interdit les expertises psychiatriques à distance : l’enfer est toujours pavé de bonnes intentions
A recent judgment handed down by the Court of Cassation prohibits the use of telecommunications means to carry out psychiatric assessments. This ban can be welcomed in that it makes it possible to offer quality expertise throughout France, but on the contrary, it arouses fear given the low number of experts and their uniform distribution across the territory.
期刊介绍:
The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues