波兰评估员令人质疑的独立性及其对欧洲法律秩序的影响

Q4 Social Sciences
Marcin Dorochowicz, B. Gronowska, Piotr Sadowski
{"title":"波兰评估员令人质疑的独立性及其对欧洲法律秩序的影响","authors":"Marcin Dorochowicz, B. Gronowska, Piotr Sadowski","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.6.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article critically analyses the Polish institution of assessor (junior judge) and the impact of hampering this institution’s independence on decisions of other European courts. Using the dogmatic-legal method, the authors conclude that procedures of nominating assessors and ending their periods of service do not respect the right to a fair trial guaranteed in the European Convention on Human Rights, and in EU law. Assessors adjudicate mainly in a one-person bench. Thus, although under EU law states should only exceptionally verify if decisions made by other states respect fundamental rights, such verifications may become routine.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Questionable Independence of Polish Assessors and Its Effects on the European Legal Order\",\"authors\":\"Marcin Dorochowicz, B. Gronowska, Piotr Sadowski\",\"doi\":\"10.3935/zpfz.73.6.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article critically analyses the Polish institution of assessor (junior judge) and the impact of hampering this institution’s independence on decisions of other European courts. Using the dogmatic-legal method, the authors conclude that procedures of nominating assessors and ending their periods of service do not respect the right to a fair trial guaranteed in the European Convention on Human Rights, and in EU law. Assessors adjudicate mainly in a one-person bench. Thus, although under EU law states should only exceptionally verify if decisions made by other states respect fundamental rights, such verifications may become routine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.6.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.6.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文批判性地分析了波兰的襄审官(初级法官)制度以及妨碍该制度独立性对其他欧洲法院判决的影响。作者采用教条法律方法得出结论,认为襄审官的提名和任期终止程序并不尊重《欧洲人权公约》和欧盟法律所保障的公平审判权。陪审员主要由一人担任。因此,尽管根据欧盟法律,各国只应在例外情况下核查其他国家做出的裁决是否尊重基本权利,但这种核查可能会成为例行公事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Questionable Independence of Polish Assessors and Its Effects on the European Legal Order
This article critically analyses the Polish institution of assessor (junior judge) and the impact of hampering this institution’s independence on decisions of other European courts. Using the dogmatic-legal method, the authors conclude that procedures of nominating assessors and ending their periods of service do not respect the right to a fair trial guaranteed in the European Convention on Human Rights, and in EU law. Assessors adjudicate mainly in a one-person bench. Thus, although under EU law states should only exceptionally verify if decisions made by other states respect fundamental rights, such verifications may become routine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信