YouTube是机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术教学的可靠工具吗?对现有资源的严格审查

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Alexis Sánchez , Omaira Rodríguez , Manuel Medina , Liumariel Vegas , Francisco Couto , Ivan Mogollon , Cristina Inchausti , Luz Galvis
{"title":"YouTube是机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术教学的可靠工具吗?对现有资源的严格审查","authors":"Alexis Sánchez ,&nbsp;Omaira Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Manuel Medina ,&nbsp;Liumariel Vegas ,&nbsp;Francisco Couto ,&nbsp;Ivan Mogollon ,&nbsp;Cristina Inchausti ,&nbsp;Luz Galvis","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2023.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) is a relatively recent technique for the treatment of inguinal hernia. To achieve optimal results, the 10 golden rules described must be followed. Surgeons in training often review vídeos to familiarize themselves with new techniques, YouTube being one of the most used platforms. The objective of this study is to carry out an evaluation of the 10 most viewed vídeos on YouTube of inguinal hernia repair by transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) to determine if the 10 golden rules are met.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Identify and evaluate the 10 vídeos with the highest number of views related to rTAPP. Three experienced surgeons evaluated compliance with the 10 golden rules using a Likert scale. Data were analyzed in Excel (Microsoft) and plotted with Tableau (Tableau Inc.). The consistency between evaluators was determined using Cronbach's alpha, considering a value &gt;0.7 acceptable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average overall evaluation was 3.63 with a range of 2.6–4.9. The scores related to compliance with the rules 1, 2, 9 and 10 were satisfactory; on the other hand, rules 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 were weak, particularly rule number 7. Internal consistency was observed between raters with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.98.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lack of compliance with the 10 golden rules in most of the vídeos demonstrates that the use of vídeos (YouTube) is not an adequate resource for learning robot-assisted inguinal hernia cure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Es YouTube una herramienta fiable para la enseñanza de cura de hernia inguinal asistida por robot? Una revisión crítica de los recursos disponibles\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Sánchez ,&nbsp;Omaira Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Manuel Medina ,&nbsp;Liumariel Vegas ,&nbsp;Francisco Couto ,&nbsp;Ivan Mogollon ,&nbsp;Cristina Inchausti ,&nbsp;Luz Galvis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ciresp.2023.08.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) is a relatively recent technique for the treatment of inguinal hernia. To achieve optimal results, the 10 golden rules described must be followed. Surgeons in training often review vídeos to familiarize themselves with new techniques, YouTube being one of the most used platforms. The objective of this study is to carry out an evaluation of the 10 most viewed vídeos on YouTube of inguinal hernia repair by transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) to determine if the 10 golden rules are met.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Identify and evaluate the 10 vídeos with the highest number of views related to rTAPP. Three experienced surgeons evaluated compliance with the 10 golden rules using a Likert scale. Data were analyzed in Excel (Microsoft) and plotted with Tableau (Tableau Inc.). The consistency between evaluators was determined using Cronbach's alpha, considering a value &gt;0.7 acceptable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average overall evaluation was 3.63 with a range of 2.6–4.9. The scores related to compliance with the rules 1, 2, 9 and 10 were satisfactory; on the other hand, rules 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 were weak, particularly rule number 7. Internal consistency was observed between raters with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.98.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lack of compliance with the 10 golden rules in most of the vídeos demonstrates that the use of vídeos (YouTube) is not an adequate resource for learning robot-assisted inguinal hernia cure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia Espanola\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia Espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X23002439\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X23002439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言机器人经腹腹膜前入路(rTAPP)是一种治疗腹股沟疝的较新技术。要达到最佳效果,必须遵循所述的 10 条黄金法则。接受培训的外科医生经常通过观看视频来熟悉新技术,YouTube 是最常用的平台之一。本研究旨在对 YouTube 上浏览量最高的 10 个经腹膜前入路(rTAPP)腹股沟疝修补术视频进行评估,以确定是否符合 10 条黄金法则。三位经验丰富的外科医生使用李克特量表评估了 10 条黄金法则的合规性。数据用 Excel(Microsoft)进行分析,并用 Tableau(Tableau Inc.)评价者之间的一致性采用 Cronbach's alpha 进行测定,认为 0.7 的值可以接受。结果平均总体评价为 3.63,范围在 2.6-4.9 之间。与遵守第 1、2、9 和 10 条规则有关的得分令人满意;而第 3、4、5、7 和 8 条规则的得分较低,尤其是第 7 条规则。大多数视频都没有遵守 10 条黄金规则,这表明使用视频(YouTube)并不是学习机器人辅助腹股沟疝治疗的适当资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

¿Es YouTube una herramienta fiable para la enseñanza de cura de hernia inguinal asistida por robot? Una revisión crítica de los recursos disponibles

¿Es YouTube una herramienta fiable para la enseñanza de cura de hernia inguinal asistida por robot? Una revisión crítica de los recursos disponibles

Introduction

The robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) is a relatively recent technique for the treatment of inguinal hernia. To achieve optimal results, the 10 golden rules described must be followed. Surgeons in training often review vídeos to familiarize themselves with new techniques, YouTube being one of the most used platforms. The objective of this study is to carry out an evaluation of the 10 most viewed vídeos on YouTube of inguinal hernia repair by transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) to determine if the 10 golden rules are met.

Methods

Identify and evaluate the 10 vídeos with the highest number of views related to rTAPP. Three experienced surgeons evaluated compliance with the 10 golden rules using a Likert scale. Data were analyzed in Excel (Microsoft) and plotted with Tableau (Tableau Inc.). The consistency between evaluators was determined using Cronbach's alpha, considering a value >0.7 acceptable.

Results

The average overall evaluation was 3.63 with a range of 2.6–4.9. The scores related to compliance with the rules 1, 2, 9 and 10 were satisfactory; on the other hand, rules 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 were weak, particularly rule number 7. Internal consistency was observed between raters with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.98.

Conclusions

The lack of compliance with the 10 golden rules in most of the vídeos demonstrates that the use of vídeos (YouTube) is not an adequate resource for learning robot-assisted inguinal hernia cure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Espanola
Cirugia Espanola SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
21.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信