被排斥者的一线希望:探索微型任务众包为工作能力受损的工人带来的体验

IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Anne-Sophie Mayer, Andreas Ihl, Susanne Grabl, Kim Strunk, Marina Fiedler
{"title":"被排斥者的一线希望:探索微型任务众包为工作能力受损的工人带来的体验","authors":"Anne-Sophie Mayer,&nbsp;Andreas Ihl,&nbsp;Susanne Grabl,&nbsp;Kim Strunk,&nbsp;Marina Fiedler","doi":"10.1111/isj.12511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Micro-task crowdsourcing (MTCS) platforms offer alternative work settings outside traditional work boundaries and thus increasingly attract crowdworkers who face exclusion from access to other work. However, we know little about these crowdworkers' perspective on MTCS and its implications for their personal life. Building on insights from three qualitative surveys with responses from 538 crowdworkers and 576 forum posts in total, we show that despite the often challenging work conditions, MTCS platforms provide these crowdworkers with a work environment in which they can participate in paid work activities without feeling excluded due to their personal circumstances. As a result, MTCS platform work provides these crowdworkers with a set of positive experiences that were not possible before. These afforded experiences go beyond work-related experiences but relate directly to crowdworkers' personal situation and life. Our research yields implications for the literature on MTCS and also for policy makers and stakeholders concerned with the creation of more inclusive work settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"1838-1870"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12511","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A silver lining for the excluded: Exploring experiences that micro-task crowdsourcing affords workers with impaired work access\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Sophie Mayer,&nbsp;Andreas Ihl,&nbsp;Susanne Grabl,&nbsp;Kim Strunk,&nbsp;Marina Fiedler\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/isj.12511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Micro-task crowdsourcing (MTCS) platforms offer alternative work settings outside traditional work boundaries and thus increasingly attract crowdworkers who face exclusion from access to other work. However, we know little about these crowdworkers' perspective on MTCS and its implications for their personal life. Building on insights from three qualitative surveys with responses from 538 crowdworkers and 576 forum posts in total, we show that despite the often challenging work conditions, MTCS platforms provide these crowdworkers with a work environment in which they can participate in paid work activities without feeling excluded due to their personal circumstances. As a result, MTCS platform work provides these crowdworkers with a set of positive experiences that were not possible before. These afforded experiences go beyond work-related experiences but relate directly to crowdworkers' personal situation and life. Our research yields implications for the literature on MTCS and also for policy makers and stakeholders concerned with the creation of more inclusive work settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"1838-1870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12511\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12511\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微任务众包(MTCS)平台提供了传统工作界限之外的另一种工作环境,因此越来越多地吸引了那些面临被排斥在其他工作之外的众包工作者。然而,我们对这些众包工作者对 MTCS 的看法及其对个人生活的影响知之甚少。我们通过三项定性调查(共收到 538 名众包工作者的回复和 576 个论坛帖子)得出的结论表明,尽管工作条件往往具有挑战性,但 MTCS 平台为这些众包工作者提供了一个工作环境,使他们能够参与有偿工作活动,而不会因为个人情况而感到被排斥在外。因此,MTCS 平台的工作为这些众包工作者提供了一系列以前不可能获得的积极体验。这些体验超越了与工作相关的体验,而是与众包工作者的个人状况和生活直接相关。我们的研究对有关 MTCS 的文献产生了影响,同时也对关注创造更具包容性工作环境的政策制定者和利益相关者产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A silver lining for the excluded: Exploring experiences that micro-task crowdsourcing affords workers with impaired work access

A silver lining for the excluded: Exploring experiences that micro-task crowdsourcing affords workers with impaired work access

Micro-task crowdsourcing (MTCS) platforms offer alternative work settings outside traditional work boundaries and thus increasingly attract crowdworkers who face exclusion from access to other work. However, we know little about these crowdworkers' perspective on MTCS and its implications for their personal life. Building on insights from three qualitative surveys with responses from 538 crowdworkers and 576 forum posts in total, we show that despite the often challenging work conditions, MTCS platforms provide these crowdworkers with a work environment in which they can participate in paid work activities without feeling excluded due to their personal circumstances. As a result, MTCS platform work provides these crowdworkers with a set of positive experiences that were not possible before. These afforded experiences go beyond work-related experiences but relate directly to crowdworkers' personal situation and life. Our research yields implications for the literature on MTCS and also for policy makers and stakeholders concerned with the creation of more inclusive work settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Systems Journal
Information Systems Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is an international journal promoting the study of, and interest in, information systems. Articles are welcome on research, practice, experience, current issues and debates. The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using appropriate research methods.The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers. Quantitative research papers are also welcome but they need to emphasise the context of the research and the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.The ISJ does not publish purely technical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信