总统制下总统和副总统任期的合宪性

Dian Herlambang, Raesitha Zildjianda
{"title":"总统制下总统和副总统任期的合宪性","authors":"Dian Herlambang, Raesitha Zildjianda","doi":"10.18415/ijmmu.v11i3.5518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of a three-year presidential discourse through the 5th Amendment Bill to the 1945 Constitution does have advantages and losses, considering the considerable implications of a president who serves three terms. This study has two objectives, namely first to find out how the presidential system reacts to proposed changes, and second, how the debate around the 5th Constitution of 1945 affects changes in presidential mandates in 3 terms. This study is a standard legal research that uses three approaches, namely the legal approach, the historical constitutional approach, and the conceptual approach. There are two conclusions in this study, first, the presidential term of office more than 2 terms can be unconstitutional if it is not on the path of change, but if you want to make changes by extending the presidential term to 3 terms of change principle. may violate the principles of constitutional democracy and the constitutional presidential system. Second, because of the term of office of president.","PeriodicalId":14024,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","volume":"6 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutionalism of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Terms in a Presidential System\",\"authors\":\"Dian Herlambang, Raesitha Zildjianda\",\"doi\":\"10.18415/ijmmu.v11i3.5518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existence of a three-year presidential discourse through the 5th Amendment Bill to the 1945 Constitution does have advantages and losses, considering the considerable implications of a president who serves three terms. This study has two objectives, namely first to find out how the presidential system reacts to proposed changes, and second, how the debate around the 5th Constitution of 1945 affects changes in presidential mandates in 3 terms. This study is a standard legal research that uses three approaches, namely the legal approach, the historical constitutional approach, and the conceptual approach. There are two conclusions in this study, first, the presidential term of office more than 2 terms can be unconstitutional if it is not on the path of change, but if you want to make changes by extending the presidential term to 3 terms of change principle. may violate the principles of constitutional democracy and the constitutional presidential system. Second, because of the term of office of president.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding\",\"volume\":\"6 27\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i3.5518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i3.5518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到总统连任三届所产生的巨大影响,通过 1945 年《宪法》第 5 次修正法案而存在的三年总统任期确实有利有弊。本研究有两个目的,一是了解总统制如何对拟议的变革做出反应,二是围绕 1945 年第五次宪法的辩论如何影响三届总统任期的变化。本研究是一项标准的法律研究,采用了三种方法,即法律方法、历史宪法方法和概念方法。本研究有两个结论,第一,总统任期超过2届如果不走变革之路可以违宪,但如果想通过延长总统任期到3届的变革原则进行变革。可能会违反宪政民主原则和总统制宪政原则。其次,由于总统任期的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constitutionalism of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Terms in a Presidential System
The existence of a three-year presidential discourse through the 5th Amendment Bill to the 1945 Constitution does have advantages and losses, considering the considerable implications of a president who serves three terms. This study has two objectives, namely first to find out how the presidential system reacts to proposed changes, and second, how the debate around the 5th Constitution of 1945 affects changes in presidential mandates in 3 terms. This study is a standard legal research that uses three approaches, namely the legal approach, the historical constitutional approach, and the conceptual approach. There are two conclusions in this study, first, the presidential term of office more than 2 terms can be unconstitutional if it is not on the path of change, but if you want to make changes by extending the presidential term to 3 terms of change principle. may violate the principles of constitutional democracy and the constitutional presidential system. Second, because of the term of office of president.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信