数据隐私法律与合规:欧盟 GDPR 与美国法规的比较审查

Seun Solomon Bakare, Adekunle Oyeyemi Adeniyi, Chidiogo Uzoamaka Akpuokwe, Nkechi Emmanuella Eneh
{"title":"数据隐私法律与合规:欧盟 GDPR 与美国法规的比较审查","authors":"Seun Solomon Bakare, Adekunle Oyeyemi Adeniyi, Chidiogo Uzoamaka Akpuokwe, Nkechi Emmanuella Eneh","doi":"10.51594/csitrj.v5i3.859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Review provides an overview of the comparative review of data privacy laws and compliance, focusing on the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR) and data protection regulations in the United States. The analysis explores key similarities and differences, emphasizing their implications for businesses and individuals. The EU GDPR, implemented in 2018, stands as a landmark regulation governing data protection and privacy for individuals within the European Union and the European Economic Area. In contrast, the United States lacks a comprehensive federal data privacy law. Instead, it relies on a patchwork of sector-specific laws and state regulations, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).  One major distinction lies in the overarching principles of these regulations. The EU GDPR adopts a comprehensive and rights-based approach, emphasizing individual rights to privacy, data portability, and the \"right to be forgotten.\" In contrast, the U.S. system often focuses on specific industries or types of data, leading to a more fragmented regulatory landscape. Both regulatory frameworks incorporate principles of transparency, consent, and data breach notification. However, differences in enforcement mechanisms and penalties exist. The EU GDPR imposes significant fines for non-compliance, reaching up to 4% of a company's global annual revenue. In the U.S., penalties vary by state, and enforcement is often reactive, triggered by data breaches. Businesses operating globally must navigate these distinct regulatory landscapes, necessitating a nuanced approach to data privacy compliance. Multinational corporations must adhere to the more stringent requirements when handling EU citizens' data while also considering the diverse regulations within the U.S. This review underscores the ongoing evolution of data privacy laws worldwide and the critical importance for organizations to stay abreast of these developments. It emphasizes the need for a proactive and adaptive approach to data privacy compliance, taking into account the unique requirements and expectations of both the EU GDPR and U.S. regulations. \nKeywords: Data Privacy, Laws, Compliance, EU GDPR, Regulations.","PeriodicalId":282796,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science & IT Research Journal","volume":"216 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DATA PRIVACY LAWS AND COMPLIANCE: A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF THE EU GDPR AND USA REGULATIONS\",\"authors\":\"Seun Solomon Bakare, Adekunle Oyeyemi Adeniyi, Chidiogo Uzoamaka Akpuokwe, Nkechi Emmanuella Eneh\",\"doi\":\"10.51594/csitrj.v5i3.859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Review provides an overview of the comparative review of data privacy laws and compliance, focusing on the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR) and data protection regulations in the United States. The analysis explores key similarities and differences, emphasizing their implications for businesses and individuals. The EU GDPR, implemented in 2018, stands as a landmark regulation governing data protection and privacy for individuals within the European Union and the European Economic Area. In contrast, the United States lacks a comprehensive federal data privacy law. Instead, it relies on a patchwork of sector-specific laws and state regulations, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).  One major distinction lies in the overarching principles of these regulations. The EU GDPR adopts a comprehensive and rights-based approach, emphasizing individual rights to privacy, data portability, and the \\\"right to be forgotten.\\\" In contrast, the U.S. system often focuses on specific industries or types of data, leading to a more fragmented regulatory landscape. Both regulatory frameworks incorporate principles of transparency, consent, and data breach notification. However, differences in enforcement mechanisms and penalties exist. The EU GDPR imposes significant fines for non-compliance, reaching up to 4% of a company's global annual revenue. In the U.S., penalties vary by state, and enforcement is often reactive, triggered by data breaches. Businesses operating globally must navigate these distinct regulatory landscapes, necessitating a nuanced approach to data privacy compliance. Multinational corporations must adhere to the more stringent requirements when handling EU citizens' data while also considering the diverse regulations within the U.S. This review underscores the ongoing evolution of data privacy laws worldwide and the critical importance for organizations to stay abreast of these developments. It emphasizes the need for a proactive and adaptive approach to data privacy compliance, taking into account the unique requirements and expectations of both the EU GDPR and U.S. regulations. \\nKeywords: Data Privacy, Laws, Compliance, EU GDPR, Regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Science & IT Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"216 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Science & IT Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i3.859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Science & IT Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i3.859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述概述了数据隐私法律和合规性的比较审查,重点是欧盟的《一般数据保护条例》(EU GDPR)和美国的数据保护法规。分析探讨了主要的相同点和不同点,强调了它们对企业和个人的影响。欧盟《一般数据保护条例》于 2018 年实施,是欧盟和欧洲经济区内管理个人数据保护和隐私的里程碑式法规。相比之下,美国缺乏全面的联邦数据隐私法。取而代之的是,它依赖于特定行业法律和州法规的拼凑,如《加利福尼亚消费者隐私法》(CCPA)和《健康保险便携性和责任法》(HIPAA)。 一个主要区别在于这些法规的总体原则。欧盟 GDPR 采用了一种全面的、以权利为基础的方法,强调个人的隐私权、数据可移植性和 "被遗忘权"。相比之下,美国的制度往往侧重于特定行业或数据类型,导致监管环境更加分散。两种监管框架都包含透明度、同意和数据泄露通知等原则。但在执行机制和处罚方面存在差异。欧盟 GDPR 对违规行为处以巨额罚款,最高可达公司全球年收入的 4%。在美国,各州的处罚有所不同,执法通常是被动的,由数据泄露引发。在全球运营的企业必须在这些不同的监管环境中游刃有余,因此有必要对数据隐私合规采取细致入微的方法。跨国公司在处理欧盟公民数据时必须遵守更严格的要求,同时也要考虑到美国国内的各种法规。本评论强调了全球数据隐私法律的不断演变,以及企业紧跟这些发展的至关重要性。它强调,在考虑欧盟 GDPR 和美国法规的独特要求和期望的同时,需要采取积极主动和适应性强的方法来遵守数据隐私法规。关键词数据隐私、法律、合规、欧盟 GDPR、法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DATA PRIVACY LAWS AND COMPLIANCE: A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF THE EU GDPR AND USA REGULATIONS
This Review provides an overview of the comparative review of data privacy laws and compliance, focusing on the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR) and data protection regulations in the United States. The analysis explores key similarities and differences, emphasizing their implications for businesses and individuals. The EU GDPR, implemented in 2018, stands as a landmark regulation governing data protection and privacy for individuals within the European Union and the European Economic Area. In contrast, the United States lacks a comprehensive federal data privacy law. Instead, it relies on a patchwork of sector-specific laws and state regulations, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).  One major distinction lies in the overarching principles of these regulations. The EU GDPR adopts a comprehensive and rights-based approach, emphasizing individual rights to privacy, data portability, and the "right to be forgotten." In contrast, the U.S. system often focuses on specific industries or types of data, leading to a more fragmented regulatory landscape. Both regulatory frameworks incorporate principles of transparency, consent, and data breach notification. However, differences in enforcement mechanisms and penalties exist. The EU GDPR imposes significant fines for non-compliance, reaching up to 4% of a company's global annual revenue. In the U.S., penalties vary by state, and enforcement is often reactive, triggered by data breaches. Businesses operating globally must navigate these distinct regulatory landscapes, necessitating a nuanced approach to data privacy compliance. Multinational corporations must adhere to the more stringent requirements when handling EU citizens' data while also considering the diverse regulations within the U.S. This review underscores the ongoing evolution of data privacy laws worldwide and the critical importance for organizations to stay abreast of these developments. It emphasizes the need for a proactive and adaptive approach to data privacy compliance, taking into account the unique requirements and expectations of both the EU GDPR and U.S. regulations. Keywords: Data Privacy, Laws, Compliance, EU GDPR, Regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信