在制定高危新生儿听力筛查方案时,应如何考虑高胆红素血症?

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga, Anna Paula Dionizio da Silva Campelo, M. S. Rays, Alice Andrade Lopes Amorim, E. Araújo, L. C. Jacob
{"title":"在制定高危新生儿听力筛查方案时,应如何考虑高胆红素血症?","authors":"Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga, Anna Paula Dionizio da Silva Campelo, M. S. Rays, Alice Andrade Lopes Amorim, E. Araújo, L. C. Jacob","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232022273en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose To analyze hyperbilirubinemia as an indicator for the definition of risk protocol in newborn hearing screening (NHS) and in auditory monitoring in full-term and preterm neonates. Methods This is an observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study. A total of 554 children born in a public maternity hospital were included and divided into two groups: (G1) with 373 full-terms neonates; (G2) with 181 preterm neonates. Data were collected from the participant’s medical records to obtain information regarding the result of the NHS, performed by recording the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR), birth conditions, clinical characteristics, interventions performed, and results of the first test of total bilirubin (TB) and indirect bilirubin (IB) as well as the peak of TB and IB. A descriptive statistical analysis of the results was performed, and the level of significance adopted was 5%. Results On the NHS test, quotes of retest referral rates were smaller in G1 when compared to G2. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding type of delivery, gender, presence of Rh and ABO incompatibility, G6PD enzyme deficiency, and performance of phototherapy. TB and IB levels at the first exam and at peak time did not differ between neonates with “pass” and “fail” results on the NHS test in both groups. Conclusion Bilirubin levels in the neonatal period below the recommended values for indication of exchange transfusion are not directly related to the “fail” result on the NHS tests in term and preterm neonates.","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How should hyperbilirubinemia be considered in the definition of the hearing screening protocol for neonates at risk?\",\"authors\":\"Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga, Anna Paula Dionizio da Silva Campelo, M. S. Rays, Alice Andrade Lopes Amorim, E. Araújo, L. C. Jacob\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2317-1782/20232022273en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Purpose To analyze hyperbilirubinemia as an indicator for the definition of risk protocol in newborn hearing screening (NHS) and in auditory monitoring in full-term and preterm neonates. Methods This is an observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study. A total of 554 children born in a public maternity hospital were included and divided into two groups: (G1) with 373 full-terms neonates; (G2) with 181 preterm neonates. Data were collected from the participant’s medical records to obtain information regarding the result of the NHS, performed by recording the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR), birth conditions, clinical characteristics, interventions performed, and results of the first test of total bilirubin (TB) and indirect bilirubin (IB) as well as the peak of TB and IB. A descriptive statistical analysis of the results was performed, and the level of significance adopted was 5%. Results On the NHS test, quotes of retest referral rates were smaller in G1 when compared to G2. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding type of delivery, gender, presence of Rh and ABO incompatibility, G6PD enzyme deficiency, and performance of phototherapy. TB and IB levels at the first exam and at peak time did not differ between neonates with “pass” and “fail” results on the NHS test in both groups. Conclusion Bilirubin levels in the neonatal period below the recommended values for indication of exchange transfusion are not directly related to the “fail” result on the NHS tests in term and preterm neonates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CoDAS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CoDAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022273en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022273en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 目的 分析高胆红素血症作为新生儿听力筛查(NHS)和听力监测中足月儿和早产儿风险方案定义的指标。方法 这是一项观察性、横断面和回顾性研究。共纳入 554 名在公立妇产医院出生的儿童,并将其分为两组:(G1)373 名足月新生儿;(G2)181 名早产新生儿。研究人员从受试者的病历中收集数据,以了解通过记录自动听觉脑干反应(AABR)进行的新生儿健康状况调查的结果、出生条件、临床特征、所采取的干预措施、总胆红素(TB)和间接胆红素(IB)的首次检测结果以及 TB 和 IB 的峰值。对结果进行了描述性统计分析,采用的显著性水平为 5%。结果 在 NHS 检验中,G1 组的复检转诊率低于 G2 组。在分娩类型、性别、是否存在 Rh 和 ABO 不相容、G6PD 酶缺乏症以及光疗效果方面,两组之间没有明显差异。两组新生儿在首次检查和高峰期的 TB 和 IB 水平在 NHS 检测结果为 "合格 "和 "不合格 "的新生儿之间没有差异。结论 在足月和早产新生儿中,新生儿期胆红素水平低于换血指征建议值与 NHS 检测结果 "未通过 "没有直接关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How should hyperbilirubinemia be considered in the definition of the hearing screening protocol for neonates at risk?
ABSTRACT Purpose To analyze hyperbilirubinemia as an indicator for the definition of risk protocol in newborn hearing screening (NHS) and in auditory monitoring in full-term and preterm neonates. Methods This is an observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study. A total of 554 children born in a public maternity hospital were included and divided into two groups: (G1) with 373 full-terms neonates; (G2) with 181 preterm neonates. Data were collected from the participant’s medical records to obtain information regarding the result of the NHS, performed by recording the automated auditory brainstem response (AABR), birth conditions, clinical characteristics, interventions performed, and results of the first test of total bilirubin (TB) and indirect bilirubin (IB) as well as the peak of TB and IB. A descriptive statistical analysis of the results was performed, and the level of significance adopted was 5%. Results On the NHS test, quotes of retest referral rates were smaller in G1 when compared to G2. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding type of delivery, gender, presence of Rh and ABO incompatibility, G6PD enzyme deficiency, and performance of phototherapy. TB and IB levels at the first exam and at peak time did not differ between neonates with “pass” and “fail” results on the NHS test in both groups. Conclusion Bilirubin levels in the neonatal period below the recommended values for indication of exchange transfusion are not directly related to the “fail” result on the NHS tests in term and preterm neonates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信