多重隐私法规和国家安全基础设施对医疗信息交换的影响:对欧洲各地医院的研究

Utkarsh Shrivastava, Bernard T. Han, Ying Zhou, Muhammad Razi
{"title":"多重隐私法规和国家安全基础设施对医疗信息交换的影响:对欧洲各地医院的研究","authors":"Utkarsh Shrivastava, Bernard T. Han, Ying Zhou, Muhammad Razi","doi":"10.1108/dprg-07-2023-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSharing patient health information (PHI) among hospitals has been much slower than the adoption of health record systems. This paper aims to investigate if privacy regulation (PR) or security measures (SMs) influence hospitals’ use of health information exchange (HIE) to share PHI with other providers (e.g. physicians, labs, hospitals). The study specifically focuses on how multiple PRs can impede and a strong national security infrastructure (NSI) can support HIE.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study uses secondary data from a multi-national and multi-hospital survey administered by the European Union. The multi-level structure of the cross-sectional panel data is used to test the influence of both hospital-level (e.g. PR) and national-level variables (e.g. NSI) on HIE. A total of nine types of HIE, three types of PRs, nine SMs and other relevant control variables are considered. This study uses a two-level random intercept generalized linear model to test the hypothesis proposed in the study.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study finds that national-level PRs (NLPR) have the strongest positive influence on HIE in comparison to regional (RLPR) and hospital-level (HLPR) PRs. Moreover, the study finds evidence that the presence of RLPR and HLPR, on average, decreases the positive impact of NLPR by 264%. The SMs also have a significant and positive impact on HIE. Adoption of an additional SM can increase the odds of engaging in a certain type of HIE between 21% and 61%. On the other hand, a strong NSI can also amplify the positive impact of SM on certain types of HIE.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study extends prior research on the role of PRs in enabling HIE by considering the complexities brought up by adopting multiple PRs. NLPRs have the strongest impact on HIE in comparison to RLPRs or HLPRs. Moreover, public infrastructure initiatives such as those related to secure communications can also complement SMs adopted by the providers by encouraging HIE.\n","PeriodicalId":515139,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance","volume":"62 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impacts of multiple privacy regulations and national security infrastructure on health information exchange: a study of hospitals across Europe\",\"authors\":\"Utkarsh Shrivastava, Bernard T. Han, Ying Zhou, Muhammad Razi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dprg-07-2023-0105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nSharing patient health information (PHI) among hospitals has been much slower than the adoption of health record systems. This paper aims to investigate if privacy regulation (PR) or security measures (SMs) influence hospitals’ use of health information exchange (HIE) to share PHI with other providers (e.g. physicians, labs, hospitals). The study specifically focuses on how multiple PRs can impede and a strong national security infrastructure (NSI) can support HIE.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe study uses secondary data from a multi-national and multi-hospital survey administered by the European Union. The multi-level structure of the cross-sectional panel data is used to test the influence of both hospital-level (e.g. PR) and national-level variables (e.g. NSI) on HIE. A total of nine types of HIE, three types of PRs, nine SMs and other relevant control variables are considered. This study uses a two-level random intercept generalized linear model to test the hypothesis proposed in the study.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe study finds that national-level PRs (NLPR) have the strongest positive influence on HIE in comparison to regional (RLPR) and hospital-level (HLPR) PRs. Moreover, the study finds evidence that the presence of RLPR and HLPR, on average, decreases the positive impact of NLPR by 264%. The SMs also have a significant and positive impact on HIE. Adoption of an additional SM can increase the odds of engaging in a certain type of HIE between 21% and 61%. On the other hand, a strong NSI can also amplify the positive impact of SM on certain types of HIE.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study extends prior research on the role of PRs in enabling HIE by considering the complexities brought up by adopting multiple PRs. NLPRs have the strongest impact on HIE in comparison to RLPRs or HLPRs. Moreover, public infrastructure initiatives such as those related to secure communications can also complement SMs adopted by the providers by encouraging HIE.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":515139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance\",\"volume\":\"62 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-07-2023-0105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-07-2023-0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 医院之间共享患者健康信息 (PHI) 的速度远远低于采用健康记录系统的速度。本文旨在研究隐私法规(PR)或安全措施(SMs)是否会影响医院使用健康信息交换(HIE)与其他医疗服务提供者(如医生、实验室、医院)共享 PHI。本研究特别关注多重 PR 如何阻碍 HIE 以及强大的国家安全基础设施 (NSI) 如何支持 HIE。横截面面板数据的多层次结构用于检验医院层面(如 PR)和国家层面变量(如 NSI)对 HIE 的影响。共考虑了 9 种 HIE、3 种 PR、9 种 SM 及其他相关控制变量。本研究采用两级随机截距广义线性模型来检验研究中提出的假设。研究结果研究发现,与地区级 PR(RLPR)和医院级 PR(HLPR)相比,国家级 PR(NLPR)对 HIE 的积极影响最大。此外,研究还发现有证据表明,区域级 PR 和医院级 PR 的存在平均会将国家级 PR 的积极影响降低 264%。SM 对 HIE 也有显著的积极影响。采用额外的 SM 可以使参与某类 HIE 的几率增加 21% 到 61%。另一方面,强大的国家创新机制也能放大 SM 对某些类型 HIE 的积极影响。原创性/价值本研究通过考虑采用多种 PR 带来的复杂性,扩展了之前关于 PR 在促进 HIE 方面作用的研究。与有限制性公关措施或无限制性公关措施相比,无限制性公关措施对 HIE 的影响最大。此外,公共基础设施举措(如与安全通信相关的举措)也可以通过鼓励 HIE 来补充医疗服务提供者采用的 SM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impacts of multiple privacy regulations and national security infrastructure on health information exchange: a study of hospitals across Europe
Purpose Sharing patient health information (PHI) among hospitals has been much slower than the adoption of health record systems. This paper aims to investigate if privacy regulation (PR) or security measures (SMs) influence hospitals’ use of health information exchange (HIE) to share PHI with other providers (e.g. physicians, labs, hospitals). The study specifically focuses on how multiple PRs can impede and a strong national security infrastructure (NSI) can support HIE. Design/methodology/approach The study uses secondary data from a multi-national and multi-hospital survey administered by the European Union. The multi-level structure of the cross-sectional panel data is used to test the influence of both hospital-level (e.g. PR) and national-level variables (e.g. NSI) on HIE. A total of nine types of HIE, three types of PRs, nine SMs and other relevant control variables are considered. This study uses a two-level random intercept generalized linear model to test the hypothesis proposed in the study. Findings The study finds that national-level PRs (NLPR) have the strongest positive influence on HIE in comparison to regional (RLPR) and hospital-level (HLPR) PRs. Moreover, the study finds evidence that the presence of RLPR and HLPR, on average, decreases the positive impact of NLPR by 264%. The SMs also have a significant and positive impact on HIE. Adoption of an additional SM can increase the odds of engaging in a certain type of HIE between 21% and 61%. On the other hand, a strong NSI can also amplify the positive impact of SM on certain types of HIE. Originality/value This study extends prior research on the role of PRs in enabling HIE by considering the complexities brought up by adopting multiple PRs. NLPRs have the strongest impact on HIE in comparison to RLPRs or HLPRs. Moreover, public infrastructure initiatives such as those related to secure communications can also complement SMs adopted by the providers by encouraging HIE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信