用氰基丙烯酸乙酯固定和用钛螺钉固定的骨移植组织学分析:大鼠实验研究

Q3 Dentistry
Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1111/ors.12884
Paula Carolina de Souza Chandretti, Rodrigo Falci Santos, Isabelle Cristina Garcia Júlio, Ana Gabriela Carvalho Rocha, Yuri de Lima Medeiros, Ângela Maria Gollner, N. Assis
{"title":"用氰基丙烯酸乙酯固定和用钛螺钉固定的骨移植组织学分析:大鼠实验研究","authors":"Paula Carolina de Souza Chandretti, Rodrigo Falci Santos, Isabelle Cristina Garcia Júlio, Ana Gabriela Carvalho Rocha, Yuri de Lima Medeiros, Ângela Maria Gollner, N. Assis","doi":"10.1111/ors.12884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate, through qualitative and semi‐quantitative histological analysis, onlay autologous bone grafts fixed with ethyl‐cyanoacrylate adhesive and titanium screw, in order to verify whether the method of applying the adhesive would interfere with the graft incorporation.Fourteen rats underwent bone graft surgery: seven grafts were fixed with ethyl‐cyanoacrylate (SB group, n = 7) and seven grafts were fixed with titanium screws (TS group, n = 7). After 30 days, the grafts were histologically analysed for vitality, adhesive presence, tissue reaction with formation of osteoid matrix, bone resorption presence, capillaries formation, inflammatory infiltrate, fibroblastic proliferation, presence of osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts. The data were submitted to non‐parametric tests, Mann–Whitney, Fisher's Test, Wilcoxon and McNemar and to statistical analysis (p < 0.05).No significant differences were found in the qualitative evaluations. While findings of more osteocytes (p = 0.035) in the TS group in greater inflammation (p = 0.030) and more osteoclasts (p = 0.048) in the SB. Despite the fact that the titanium screw has presented bone neoformation with welding points, there was no complete incorporation and the adhesive affected the bone repair in a way that not even neoformation points could be seen in 30 days.The method of applying the adhesive did not show an advantage according to the histological aspects studied, as there was the formation of a dead space at the interface of the SB group and the adhesive acted as a barrier.","PeriodicalId":38418,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery","volume":"107 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histological analysis of bone grafts fixed with ethyl‐cyanoacrylate and fixed with titanium screw: An experimental study on rats\",\"authors\":\"Paula Carolina de Souza Chandretti, Rodrigo Falci Santos, Isabelle Cristina Garcia Júlio, Ana Gabriela Carvalho Rocha, Yuri de Lima Medeiros, Ângela Maria Gollner, N. Assis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ors.12884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to evaluate, through qualitative and semi‐quantitative histological analysis, onlay autologous bone grafts fixed with ethyl‐cyanoacrylate adhesive and titanium screw, in order to verify whether the method of applying the adhesive would interfere with the graft incorporation.Fourteen rats underwent bone graft surgery: seven grafts were fixed with ethyl‐cyanoacrylate (SB group, n = 7) and seven grafts were fixed with titanium screws (TS group, n = 7). After 30 days, the grafts were histologically analysed for vitality, adhesive presence, tissue reaction with formation of osteoid matrix, bone resorption presence, capillaries formation, inflammatory infiltrate, fibroblastic proliferation, presence of osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts. The data were submitted to non‐parametric tests, Mann–Whitney, Fisher's Test, Wilcoxon and McNemar and to statistical analysis (p < 0.05).No significant differences were found in the qualitative evaluations. While findings of more osteocytes (p = 0.035) in the TS group in greater inflammation (p = 0.030) and more osteoclasts (p = 0.048) in the SB. Despite the fact that the titanium screw has presented bone neoformation with welding points, there was no complete incorporation and the adhesive affected the bone repair in a way that not even neoformation points could be seen in 30 days.The method of applying the adhesive did not show an advantage according to the histological aspects studied, as there was the formation of a dead space at the interface of the SB group and the adhesive acted as a barrier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":\"107 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过定性和半定量组织学分析,评估用氰基丙烯酸乙酯粘合剂和钛螺钉固定的嵌体自体骨移植物,以验证粘合剂的应用方法是否会影响移植物的结合。14 只大鼠接受了骨移植物手术:7 个移植物用氰基丙烯酸乙酯固定(SB 组,n = 7),7 个移植物用钛螺钉固定(TS 组,n = 7)。30 天后,对移植物进行组织学分析,以确定移植物的活力、是否存在粘合剂、组织反应与类骨基质的形成、是否存在骨吸收、毛细血管的形成、炎症浸润、成纤维细胞增殖、是否存在成骨细胞、骨细胞和破骨细胞。对这些数据进行了非参数检验、曼-惠特尼检验、费雪检验、Wilcoxon 检验和 McNemar 检验,并进行了统计分析(P < 0.05)。在定性评估中未发现明显差异,而在定量评估中发现 TS 组有更多的骨细胞(p = 0.035),SB 组有更多的炎症(p = 0.030)和更多的破骨细胞(p = 0.048)。尽管钛螺钉出现了带焊接点的骨质新生,但并没有完全融入,粘合剂影响了骨质修复,30 天后甚至看不到新生点。根据组织学方面的研究,粘合剂的应用方法并没有显示出优势,因为在 SB 组的界面上形成了死腔,粘合剂起到了屏障的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Histological analysis of bone grafts fixed with ethyl‐cyanoacrylate and fixed with titanium screw: An experimental study on rats
The aim of this study was to evaluate, through qualitative and semi‐quantitative histological analysis, onlay autologous bone grafts fixed with ethyl‐cyanoacrylate adhesive and titanium screw, in order to verify whether the method of applying the adhesive would interfere with the graft incorporation.Fourteen rats underwent bone graft surgery: seven grafts were fixed with ethyl‐cyanoacrylate (SB group, n = 7) and seven grafts were fixed with titanium screws (TS group, n = 7). After 30 days, the grafts were histologically analysed for vitality, adhesive presence, tissue reaction with formation of osteoid matrix, bone resorption presence, capillaries formation, inflammatory infiltrate, fibroblastic proliferation, presence of osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts. The data were submitted to non‐parametric tests, Mann–Whitney, Fisher's Test, Wilcoxon and McNemar and to statistical analysis (p < 0.05).No significant differences were found in the qualitative evaluations. While findings of more osteocytes (p = 0.035) in the TS group in greater inflammation (p = 0.030) and more osteoclasts (p = 0.048) in the SB. Despite the fact that the titanium screw has presented bone neoformation with welding points, there was no complete incorporation and the adhesive affected the bone repair in a way that not even neoformation points could be seen in 30 days.The method of applying the adhesive did not show an advantage according to the histological aspects studied, as there was the formation of a dead space at the interface of the SB group and the adhesive acted as a barrier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery
Oral Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信