高效液相色谱泵流速校准方法的比较

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Prangtip Uthaiwat, Theera Leeudomwong, Tassanai Sanponpute
{"title":"高效液相色谱泵流速校准方法的比较","authors":"Prangtip Uthaiwat,&nbsp;Theera Leeudomwong,&nbsp;Tassanai Sanponpute","doi":"10.1007/s00769-024-01580-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump has a main function to deliver a mobile phase which needs accuracy and stable flow rate. Recently, the reference of General European OMCL Network 2005: Qualification of Equipment Annex 1 qualification of liquid chromatography equipment presents three flow rate calibration methods that have been used to calibrate the HPLC pump performance such as using standard flow meter, gravimetric method, and volumetric method. In this reference, the calibration methods have not been clearly described. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare the flow rate calibration by the using standard flow meter, gravimetric method, and volumetric method. The flow rate was calibrated at 0.5 and 5 mL/min with three replications. The stability between days of each method was observed for three days. The calibration procedure, traceability chart, and uncertainty budget of each method had been described. The flow rate results were analyzed by using the <i>E</i><sub><i>n</i></sub> ratio. The results showed that the stability of all methods had no statistically significant difference between days when compared to the first day itself. The average measurement flow rates by using standard flow meter, gravimetric method, and volumetric method at 0.5 mL/min were 0.4908, 0.4992, and 0.5012 mL/min, respectively, and at 5 mL/min, they were 4.8346, 4.8272, and 4.8394 mL/min, respectively. These flow rates showed consistent results between each other as confirmed with the <i>E</i><sub><i>n</i></sub> ratio ≤ 1. The precision of the three methods was 0.01 to 0.08 %RSD. This study concluded that the flow rate results of three calibration methods had been consistent with each other. All methods had a good stability and precision for the flow rate calibration of the HPLC pump.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"29 3","pages":"205 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of flow rate calibration methods for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump\",\"authors\":\"Prangtip Uthaiwat,&nbsp;Theera Leeudomwong,&nbsp;Tassanai Sanponpute\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-024-01580-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump has a main function to deliver a mobile phase which needs accuracy and stable flow rate. Recently, the reference of General European OMCL Network 2005: Qualification of Equipment Annex 1 qualification of liquid chromatography equipment presents three flow rate calibration methods that have been used to calibrate the HPLC pump performance such as using standard flow meter, gravimetric method, and volumetric method. In this reference, the calibration methods have not been clearly described. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare the flow rate calibration by the using standard flow meter, gravimetric method, and volumetric method. The flow rate was calibrated at 0.5 and 5 mL/min with three replications. The stability between days of each method was observed for three days. The calibration procedure, traceability chart, and uncertainty budget of each method had been described. The flow rate results were analyzed by using the <i>E</i><sub><i>n</i></sub> ratio. The results showed that the stability of all methods had no statistically significant difference between days when compared to the first day itself. The average measurement flow rates by using standard flow meter, gravimetric method, and volumetric method at 0.5 mL/min were 0.4908, 0.4992, and 0.5012 mL/min, respectively, and at 5 mL/min, they were 4.8346, 4.8272, and 4.8394 mL/min, respectively. These flow rates showed consistent results between each other as confirmed with the <i>E</i><sub><i>n</i></sub> ratio ≤ 1. The precision of the three methods was 0.01 to 0.08 %RSD. This study concluded that the flow rate results of three calibration methods had been consistent with each other. All methods had a good stability and precision for the flow rate calibration of the HPLC pump.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"205 - 214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01580-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01580-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高效液相色谱(HPLC)泵的主要功能是输送流动相,这就需要精确和稳定的流速。最近,欧洲通用 OMCL 网络 2005 年参考文献:Annex 1 qualification of liquid chromatography equipment》的参考文献中介绍了三种校准 HPLC 泵性能的流速方法,如使用标准流量计、重量法和体积法。在这些参考文献中,没有对校准方法进行明确描述。因此,本研究旨在研究和比较使用标准流量计、重力法和体积法校准流量的方法。校准流速为 0.5 和 5 mL/min,重复三次。对每种方法的日间稳定性进行了为期三天的观察。说明了每种方法的校准程序、溯源图和不确定性预算。使用恩比分析了流速结果。结果表明,与第一天相比,所有方法的稳定性在统计上没有显著差异。使用标准流量计、重量法和体积法测量 0.5 mL/min 时的平均流速分别为 0.4908、0.4992 和 0.5012 mL/min,测量 5 mL/min 时的平均流速分别为 4.8346、4.8272 和 4.8394 mL/min。在 En 比值≤ 1 的条件下,这些流速之间的结果一致。三种方法的精确度为 0.01 至 0.08 %RSD。这项研究得出结论,三种校准方法的流速结果是一致的。所有方法对高效液相色谱泵的流速校准都具有良好的稳定性和精确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The comparison of flow rate calibration methods for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump

The comparison of flow rate calibration methods for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump has a main function to deliver a mobile phase which needs accuracy and stable flow rate. Recently, the reference of General European OMCL Network 2005: Qualification of Equipment Annex 1 qualification of liquid chromatography equipment presents three flow rate calibration methods that have been used to calibrate the HPLC pump performance such as using standard flow meter, gravimetric method, and volumetric method. In this reference, the calibration methods have not been clearly described. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare the flow rate calibration by the using standard flow meter, gravimetric method, and volumetric method. The flow rate was calibrated at 0.5 and 5 mL/min with three replications. The stability between days of each method was observed for three days. The calibration procedure, traceability chart, and uncertainty budget of each method had been described. The flow rate results were analyzed by using the En ratio. The results showed that the stability of all methods had no statistically significant difference between days when compared to the first day itself. The average measurement flow rates by using standard flow meter, gravimetric method, and volumetric method at 0.5 mL/min were 0.4908, 0.4992, and 0.5012 mL/min, respectively, and at 5 mL/min, they were 4.8346, 4.8272, and 4.8394 mL/min, respectively. These flow rates showed consistent results between each other as confirmed with the En ratio ≤ 1. The precision of the three methods was 0.01 to 0.08 %RSD. This study concluded that the flow rate results of three calibration methods had been consistent with each other. All methods had a good stability and precision for the flow rate calibration of the HPLC pump.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信