同性婚姻合法化的影响回顾

IF 2.3 3区管理学 Q2 ECONOMICS

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management Pub Date : 2024-03-24 DOI:10.1002/pam.22587

M. V. Lee Badgett, Christopher S. Carpenter, Maxine J. Lee, Dario Sansone

{"title":"同性婚姻合法化的影响回顾","authors":"M. V. Lee Badgett, Christopher S. Carpenter, Maxine J. Lee, Dario Sansone","doi":"10.1002/pam.22587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court extended nationwide legal access to same‐sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges, following a series of court cases and legislative activities at the state and district levels. Similar policies have diffused throughout other countries, especially in western Europe and the Americas. Researchers have used the staggered rollout of legal same‐sex marriage and related policies in the U.S. and elsewhere, along with improved data on lesbian, gay, and bisexual people, to study the effects of marriage equality. In this paper, we review this evidence, focusing on outcomes such as societal attitudes, marriage take‐up, family formation, employment, time use, health insurance coverage, and health. We discuss conceptual frameworks for understanding the likely effects of same‐sex marriage; methodological considerations for studying treatment effects; the policy context surrounding legal same‐sex marriage, including the 2023 Respect for Marriage Act; and important areas for future research.","PeriodicalId":48105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of the effects of legal access to same‐sex marriage\",\"authors\":\"M. V. Lee Badgett, Christopher S. Carpenter, Maxine J. Lee, Dario Sansone\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pam.22587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court extended nationwide legal access to same‐sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges, following a series of court cases and legislative activities at the state and district levels. Similar policies have diffused throughout other countries, especially in western Europe and the Americas. Researchers have used the staggered rollout of legal same‐sex marriage and related policies in the U.S. and elsewhere, along with improved data on lesbian, gay, and bisexual people, to study the effects of marriage equality. In this paper, we review this evidence, focusing on outcomes such as societal attitudes, marriage take‐up, family formation, employment, time use, health insurance coverage, and health. We discuss conceptual frameworks for understanding the likely effects of same‐sex marriage; methodological considerations for studying treatment effects; the policy context surrounding legal same‐sex marriage, including the 2023 Respect for Marriage Act; and important areas for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22587\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22587","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年6月26日，美国最高法院在 "奥伯格费尔诉霍奇斯案"（Obergefell v. Hodges）中将同性婚姻的合法准入扩大到全国范围，此前在州和地区层面还发生了一系列法庭案件和立法活动。类似的政策已在其他国家，特别是西欧和美洲推广开来。研究人员利用美国和其他国家交错推出的合法同性婚姻和相关政策，以及有关女同性恋者、男同性恋者和双性恋者的改进数据，来研究婚姻平等的影响。在本文中，我们回顾了这些证据，重点关注社会态度、结婚率、家庭组建、就业、时间使用、医疗保险覆盖率和健康等结果。我们讨论了理解同性婚姻可能产生的影响的概念框架；研究治疗效果的方法考虑；围绕合法同性婚姻的政策背景，包括 2023 年的《尊重婚姻法案》；以及未来研究的重要领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A review of the effects of legal access to same‐sex marriage

On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court extended nationwide legal access to same‐sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges, following a series of court cases and legislative activities at the state and district levels. Similar policies have diffused throughout other countries, especially in western Europe and the Americas. Researchers have used the staggered rollout of legal same‐sex marriage and related policies in the U.S. and elsewhere, along with improved data on lesbian, gay, and bisexual people, to study the effects of marriage equality. In this paper, we review this evidence, focusing on outcomes such as societal attitudes, marriage take‐up, family formation, employment, time use, health insurance coverage, and health. We discuss conceptual frameworks for understanding the likely effects of same‐sex marriage; methodological considerations for studying treatment effects; the policy context surrounding legal same‐sex marriage, including the 2023 Respect for Marriage Act; and important areas for future research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management Multiple-

CiteScore

5.80

自引率

2.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal encompasses issues and practices in policy analysis and public management. Listed among the contributors are economists, public managers, and operations researchers. Featured regularly are book reviews and a department devoted to discussing ideas and issues of importance to practitioners, researchers, and academics.