沟通与否:探索工具性网络和表达性网络对促进工作的不同影响

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Mengxiao Zhu, Ruoxiao Su, Lin Liu, Noshir Contractor
{"title":"沟通与否:探索工具性网络和表达性网络对促进工作的不同影响","authors":"Mengxiao Zhu, Ruoxiao Su, Lin Liu, Noshir Contractor","doi":"10.1017/jmo.2024.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thriving at work is closely related to the way employees are embedded in their social contexts, such as the structure of their communication relations with coworkers. In previous research, communication relations have been found to negatively relate to thriving at work. However, social network theory suggests that communication relations are beneficial in obtaining resources in the workplace, which might increase thriving at work. To reconcile the seemingly conflicting mechanisms, we draw on social network theory to unpack the mechanisms underlying communication relations by considering the instrumental and expressive roles. Using a structural equation model, we investigate the indirect effects of communication networks on thriving at work via advice-seeking networks (instrumental) and friendship networks (expressive). Our findings indicate communication relations are negatively related to thriving at work via advice-seeking relations, but are positively related to thriving at work via friendship relations.","PeriodicalId":47612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Organization","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicate or not: Exploring the different effects of instrumental and expressive networks on thriving at work\",\"authors\":\"Mengxiao Zhu, Ruoxiao Su, Lin Liu, Noshir Contractor\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jmo.2024.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thriving at work is closely related to the way employees are embedded in their social contexts, such as the structure of their communication relations with coworkers. In previous research, communication relations have been found to negatively relate to thriving at work. However, social network theory suggests that communication relations are beneficial in obtaining resources in the workplace, which might increase thriving at work. To reconcile the seemingly conflicting mechanisms, we draw on social network theory to unpack the mechanisms underlying communication relations by considering the instrumental and expressive roles. Using a structural equation model, we investigate the indirect effects of communication networks on thriving at work via advice-seeking networks (instrumental) and friendship networks (expressive). Our findings indicate communication relations are negatively related to thriving at work via advice-seeking relations, but are positively related to thriving at work via friendship relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management & Organization\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作的兴旺发达与员工融入社会环境的方式密切相关,例如他们与同事之间的沟通关系结构。在以往的研究中,人们发现沟通关系与工作中的茁壮成长呈负相关。然而,社会网络理论认为,沟通关系有利于获得工作场所的资源,从而可能提高工作的兴旺程度。为了调和看似矛盾的机制,我们借鉴了社会网络理论,通过考虑工具性和表达性作用来解读沟通关系的内在机制。利用结构方程模型,我们通过咨询网络(工具性)和友谊网络(表现性)研究了沟通网络对工作繁荣的间接影响。我们的研究结果表明,通过寻求建议的关系,沟通关系与工作成就呈负相关,但通过友谊关系,沟通关系与工作成就呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communicate or not: Exploring the different effects of instrumental and expressive networks on thriving at work
Thriving at work is closely related to the way employees are embedded in their social contexts, such as the structure of their communication relations with coworkers. In previous research, communication relations have been found to negatively relate to thriving at work. However, social network theory suggests that communication relations are beneficial in obtaining resources in the workplace, which might increase thriving at work. To reconcile the seemingly conflicting mechanisms, we draw on social network theory to unpack the mechanisms underlying communication relations by considering the instrumental and expressive roles. Using a structural equation model, we investigate the indirect effects of communication networks on thriving at work via advice-seeking networks (instrumental) and friendship networks (expressive). Our findings indicate communication relations are negatively related to thriving at work via advice-seeking relations, but are positively related to thriving at work via friendship relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management & Organization is an international peer-reviewed journal from eContent, in association with ANZAM. It provides global perspectives on management and organization of benefit to scholars, educators, students, practitioners, policy-makers and consultants worldwide. In one forum, Journal of Management & Organization covers: •Qualitative and quantitative empirical research articles •Theoretical and conceptual articles •Literature reviews - including those from theses •Articles on management education and learning •Practitioner perspectives and case studies •Methodological advances - including those from theses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信