选择分类以确定治疗胸腰椎交界处创伤的最佳策略。

Q3 Medicine
Oleksii Nekhlopochyn, Vadim Verbov, Iaroslav Tsymbaliuk, Ievgen Cheshuk, Milan Vorodi
{"title":"选择分类以确定治疗胸腰椎交界处创伤的最佳策略。","authors":"Oleksii Nekhlopochyn, Vadim Verbov, Iaroslav Tsymbaliuk, Ievgen Cheshuk, Milan Vorodi","doi":"10.36740/Merkur202401116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: To evaluate the influence of the degree of detail of the nature of the pathomorphological changes in the osteoligamentous structures on the tactics of treating the patients with the traumatic damage to the thoracolumbar junction.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the treatment tactics was carried out in 96 patients with a traumatic injury of the thoracolumbar junction, both those who underwent a surgical treatment and those who underwent a conservative therapy. The lesions were classified using F. Magerl and AOSpine classifications; the neurological status was assessed according to the ASIA scale, the nature of the damage was specified using the McCormack criteria. The statistical data processing was performed using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: The nature of the injury makes it possible to unambiguously determine the optimal method of therapy when using the F. Magerl classification with a probability of 58.33%, while in relation to the AOSpine classification this figure is 55.21%. When building the models that include the nature of the damage, the level of the neurological disorders and the McCormack criteria, it was found that the use of the F. Magerl classification demonstrates an error in unambiguously determining the most effective treatment method at the level of 26.04%, while the use of AOSpine this figure was 21.88%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: The application of the AOSpine classification is more promising for the development of a multifactorial algorithm for the treatment of the traumatic injuries of the thoracolumbar junction.</p>","PeriodicalId":39518,"journal":{"name":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","volume":"52 1","pages":"104-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The choice of classification to determine the optimal tactics for treatment of the thoracolumbar junction traumatic injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Oleksii Nekhlopochyn, Vadim Verbov, Iaroslav Tsymbaliuk, Ievgen Cheshuk, Milan Vorodi\",\"doi\":\"10.36740/Merkur202401116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: To evaluate the influence of the degree of detail of the nature of the pathomorphological changes in the osteoligamentous structures on the tactics of treating the patients with the traumatic damage to the thoracolumbar junction.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the treatment tactics was carried out in 96 patients with a traumatic injury of the thoracolumbar junction, both those who underwent a surgical treatment and those who underwent a conservative therapy. The lesions were classified using F. Magerl and AOSpine classifications; the neurological status was assessed according to the ASIA scale, the nature of the damage was specified using the McCormack criteria. The statistical data processing was performed using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: The nature of the injury makes it possible to unambiguously determine the optimal method of therapy when using the F. Magerl classification with a probability of 58.33%, while in relation to the AOSpine classification this figure is 55.21%. When building the models that include the nature of the damage, the level of the neurological disorders and the McCormack criteria, it was found that the use of the F. Magerl classification demonstrates an error in unambiguously determining the most effective treatment method at the level of 26.04%, while the use of AOSpine this figure was 21.88%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: The application of the AOSpine classification is more promising for the development of a multifactorial algorithm for the treatment of the traumatic injuries of the thoracolumbar junction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"104-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202401116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202401116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的目的:评估骨韧带结构病理形态变化的详细程度对胸腰椎交界处外伤性损伤患者治疗策略的影响:材料与方法:对96名胸腰椎交界处外伤患者的治疗策略进行了回顾性分析,其中既包括接受手术治疗的患者,也包括接受保守治疗的患者。根据 F. Magerl 和 AOSpine 分类法对病变进行分类;根据 ASIA 量表对神经状况进行评估;根据 McCormack 标准确定损伤的性质。统计数据处理采用随机森林机器学习算法:结果:结果:在使用 F. Magerl 分类法时,根据损伤性质明确确定最佳治疗方法的概率为 58.33%,而使用 AOSpine 分类法时,这一概率为 55.21%。在建立包括损害性质、神经紊乱程度和麦科马克标准的模型时,发现使用 F. Magerl 分类法在明确确定最有效的治疗方法方面的误差为 26.04%,而使用 AOSpine 分类法的误差为 21.88%:结论:结论:应用 AOSpine 分类法更有希望为胸腰椎交界处创伤的治疗制定多因素算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The choice of classification to determine the optimal tactics for treatment of the thoracolumbar junction traumatic injuries.

Objective: Aim: To evaluate the influence of the degree of detail of the nature of the pathomorphological changes in the osteoligamentous structures on the tactics of treating the patients with the traumatic damage to the thoracolumbar junction.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the treatment tactics was carried out in 96 patients with a traumatic injury of the thoracolumbar junction, both those who underwent a surgical treatment and those who underwent a conservative therapy. The lesions were classified using F. Magerl and AOSpine classifications; the neurological status was assessed according to the ASIA scale, the nature of the damage was specified using the McCormack criteria. The statistical data processing was performed using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm.

Results: Results: The nature of the injury makes it possible to unambiguously determine the optimal method of therapy when using the F. Magerl classification with a probability of 58.33%, while in relation to the AOSpine classification this figure is 55.21%. When building the models that include the nature of the damage, the level of the neurological disorders and the McCormack criteria, it was found that the use of the F. Magerl classification demonstrates an error in unambiguously determining the most effective treatment method at the level of 26.04%, while the use of AOSpine this figure was 21.88%.

Conclusion: Conclusions: The application of the AOSpine classification is more promising for the development of a multifactorial algorithm for the treatment of the traumatic injuries of the thoracolumbar junction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信