如何为具有异质生产技术的航空公司制定投入和产出目标:元前沿框架内的纳什讨价还价 DEA 方法

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Ming-Miin Yu, Ipsita Rakshit
{"title":"如何为具有异质生产技术的航空公司制定投入和产出目标:元前沿框架内的纳什讨价还价 DEA 方法","authors":"Ming-Miin Yu,&nbsp;Ipsita Rakshit","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In order to take into consideration the presence of technological heterogeneity in the aviation industry, numerous studies over the past ten years have embraced the data envelopment analysis (DEA)-based meta-frontier framework. Since group targets and meta targets are calculated independently to evaluate the technology gap in airlines, there is a possibility of obtaining unrealistic targets. Estimating the projected inputs and outputs of the evaluated units separately at both the group and meta-frontier does not automatically ensure superiority on the meta-frontier compared to the group frontier. Our proposed combined Nash bargaining model that integrates group technology and metatechnology presents a potential answer to the current unreasonable targets issue and gives more reliable outcomes. The results of the empirical application on a dataset of Alliance and Non-alliance airlines show that the proposed approach generates targets for inputs and outputs which are realistic and optimal, as well as a valid and reasonable technology gap. The finding thus validates the utilisation of our suggested model and it can be used by airline managers to improve the airline operational process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 102576"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to establish input and output targets for airlines with heterogeneous production technologies: A nash bargaining DEA approach within the meta-frontier framework\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Miin Yu,&nbsp;Ipsita Rakshit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In order to take into consideration the presence of technological heterogeneity in the aviation industry, numerous studies over the past ten years have embraced the data envelopment analysis (DEA)-based meta-frontier framework. Since group targets and meta targets are calculated independently to evaluate the technology gap in airlines, there is a possibility of obtaining unrealistic targets. Estimating the projected inputs and outputs of the evaluated units separately at both the group and meta-frontier does not automatically ensure superiority on the meta-frontier compared to the group frontier. Our proposed combined Nash bargaining model that integrates group technology and metatechnology presents a potential answer to the current unreasonable targets issue and gives more reliable outcomes. The results of the empirical application on a dataset of Alliance and Non-alliance airlines show that the proposed approach generates targets for inputs and outputs which are realistic and optimal, as well as a valid and reasonable technology gap. The finding thus validates the utilisation of our suggested model and it can be used by airline managers to improve the airline operational process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Air Transport Management\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Air Transport Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724000413\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724000413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了考虑航空业中存在的技术异质性,过去十年中,许多研究都采用了基于数据包络分析(DEA)的元前沿框架。由于在评估航空公司技术差距时,集团目标和元目标是独立计算的,因此有可能获得不切实际的目标。在集团前沿和元前沿分别估算被评估单位的预计投入和产出并不能自动确保元前沿优于集团前沿。我们提出的纳什联合议价模型融合了集团技术和元技术,为解决目前的不合理目标问题提供了一个潜在的答案,并给出了更可靠的结果。在联盟航空公司和非联盟航空公司数据集上的实证应用结果表明,所提出的方法所产生的投入和产出目标是现实的、最优的,技术差距也是有效的、合理的。因此,研究结果验证了我们建议的模型的有效性,航空公司经理可以利用该模型改进航空公司的运营流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to establish input and output targets for airlines with heterogeneous production technologies: A nash bargaining DEA approach within the meta-frontier framework

In order to take into consideration the presence of technological heterogeneity in the aviation industry, numerous studies over the past ten years have embraced the data envelopment analysis (DEA)-based meta-frontier framework. Since group targets and meta targets are calculated independently to evaluate the technology gap in airlines, there is a possibility of obtaining unrealistic targets. Estimating the projected inputs and outputs of the evaluated units separately at both the group and meta-frontier does not automatically ensure superiority on the meta-frontier compared to the group frontier. Our proposed combined Nash bargaining model that integrates group technology and metatechnology presents a potential answer to the current unreasonable targets issue and gives more reliable outcomes. The results of the empirical application on a dataset of Alliance and Non-alliance airlines show that the proposed approach generates targets for inputs and outputs which are realistic and optimal, as well as a valid and reasonable technology gap. The finding thus validates the utilisation of our suggested model and it can be used by airline managers to improve the airline operational process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信