全面审查物理治疗博士生的早期学习成绩:回顾性队列研究

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000340
Megan Eikenberry
{"title":"全面审查物理治疗博士生的早期学习成绩:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Megan Eikenberry","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A diverse health care workforce can help to address systemic health disparities. Holistic review and use of an expanded definition of underrepresented minority (URM) that includes factors beyond race and ethnicity are suggested methods to promote diversity in the physical therapist (PT) workforce and ultimately address societal health disparities.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Evidence suggests that holistic review can promote PT student diversity; however, limited evidence exists that describes the academic outcomes of holistic review that consider social determinants of learning (SDOL) factors in the review process. The purpose of this study was to examine the early academic outcomes of students after a holistic review and to examine relationships between SDOL factors and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A convenience sample of 160 students admitted to a doctor of physical therapy (DPT) program from June 2020 to June 2022 was used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis of students' self-reported responses from their admissions application was used to categorize response data into SDOL groups. An independent-sample t -test was used to test group differences in academic performance, and regression modeling was used to test relationships between SDOL factors and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean 6-month DPT program grade point average (GPA) of the sample was 3.32 ± .43. Nonstatistically significant differences appeared in early DPT GPA between URM and non-URM student groups. However, after controlling for undergraduate GPA, a history of educational disadvantage was the only SDOL factor that contributed to early DPT GPA variance (2.6%), P < .05.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The similar academic performance of URM and non-URM students provides support for using an expanded URM definition in holistic review. Most of the educationally disadvantaged group were first-generation college students, which was associated with lower early GPA. These results provide emerging evidence that first-generation students in DPT programs may benefit from additional academic support.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":"322-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Early Academic Performance of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students After Holistic Review: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Megan Eikenberry\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A diverse health care workforce can help to address systemic health disparities. Holistic review and use of an expanded definition of underrepresented minority (URM) that includes factors beyond race and ethnicity are suggested methods to promote diversity in the physical therapist (PT) workforce and ultimately address societal health disparities.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Evidence suggests that holistic review can promote PT student diversity; however, limited evidence exists that describes the academic outcomes of holistic review that consider social determinants of learning (SDOL) factors in the review process. The purpose of this study was to examine the early academic outcomes of students after a holistic review and to examine relationships between SDOL factors and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A convenience sample of 160 students admitted to a doctor of physical therapy (DPT) program from June 2020 to June 2022 was used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis of students' self-reported responses from their admissions application was used to categorize response data into SDOL groups. An independent-sample t -test was used to test group differences in academic performance, and regression modeling was used to test relationships between SDOL factors and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean 6-month DPT program grade point average (GPA) of the sample was 3.32 ± .43. Nonstatistically significant differences appeared in early DPT GPA between URM and non-URM student groups. However, after controlling for undergraduate GPA, a history of educational disadvantage was the only SDOL factor that contributed to early DPT GPA variance (2.6%), P < .05.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The similar academic performance of URM and non-URM students provides support for using an expanded URM definition in holistic review. Most of the educationally disadvantaged group were first-generation college students, which was associated with lower early GPA. These results provide emerging evidence that first-generation students in DPT programs may benefit from additional academic support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":517432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"322-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal, physical therapy education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:多元化的医疗保健队伍有助于解决系统性的健康差异问题。建议采用整体审查和使用扩大的少数族裔代表不足(URM)定义(包括种族和民族以外的因素)的方法来促进物理治疗师(PT)队伍的多元化,并最终解决社会健康差异问题:有证据表明,整体审查可以促进理疗师学生的多样性;然而,描述在审查过程中考虑学习的社会决定因素(SDOL)的整体审查的学术成果的证据有限。本研究的目的是考察学生在接受整体审查后的早期学业成绩,并研究 SDOL 因素与学业成绩之间的关系:方法:对 2020 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月被物理治疗博士(DPT)专业录取的 160 名学生进行方便抽样:对学生在入学申请中自我报告的回答进行二次分析,将回答数据分为 SDOL 组。采用独立样本t检验来检验学习成绩的组间差异,并采用回归模型来检验SDOL因素与学习成绩之间的关系:结果:DPT项目6个月平均学分绩点(GPA)为3.32 ± .43。在早期的 DPT GPA 中,URM 和非 UURM 学生组之间出现了非统计学意义上的显著差异。然而,在控制了本科 GPA 后,教育劣势史是唯一导致早期 DPT GPA 差异的 SDOL 因素(2.6%),P < .05:URM和非URM学生的学习成绩相似,这为在整体审查中使用扩大的URM定义提供了支持。大多数教育上处于不利地位的群体都是第一代大学生,这与较低的早期 GPA 有关。这些结果提供了新的证据,表明攻读博士学位课程的第一代学生可能会从额外的学业支持中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Early Academic Performance of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students After Holistic Review: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: A diverse health care workforce can help to address systemic health disparities. Holistic review and use of an expanded definition of underrepresented minority (URM) that includes factors beyond race and ethnicity are suggested methods to promote diversity in the physical therapist (PT) workforce and ultimately address societal health disparities.

Review of literature: Evidence suggests that holistic review can promote PT student diversity; however, limited evidence exists that describes the academic outcomes of holistic review that consider social determinants of learning (SDOL) factors in the review process. The purpose of this study was to examine the early academic outcomes of students after a holistic review and to examine relationships between SDOL factors and academic performance.

Subjects: A convenience sample of 160 students admitted to a doctor of physical therapy (DPT) program from June 2020 to June 2022 was used.

Methods: A secondary analysis of students' self-reported responses from their admissions application was used to categorize response data into SDOL groups. An independent-sample t -test was used to test group differences in academic performance, and regression modeling was used to test relationships between SDOL factors and academic performance.

Results: The mean 6-month DPT program grade point average (GPA) of the sample was 3.32 ± .43. Nonstatistically significant differences appeared in early DPT GPA between URM and non-URM student groups. However, after controlling for undergraduate GPA, a history of educational disadvantage was the only SDOL factor that contributed to early DPT GPA variance (2.6%), P < .05.

Discussion and conclusion: The similar academic performance of URM and non-URM students provides support for using an expanded URM definition in holistic review. Most of the educationally disadvantaged group were first-generation college students, which was associated with lower early GPA. These results provide emerging evidence that first-generation students in DPT programs may benefit from additional academic support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信