气管插管和喉罩气道全身麻醉对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者围手术期不良事件的影响:倾向评分匹配分析

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_384_22
Yanan Jia, Yu Zhang, Zihan Wang, Wei Pan, Haifeng Fu, Wenwen Du
{"title":"气管插管和喉罩气道全身麻醉对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者围手术期不良事件的影响:倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Yanan Jia, Yu Zhang, Zihan Wang, Wei Pan, Haifeng Fu, Wenwen Du","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_384_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare perioperative adverse events between general anesthesia with endotracheal tube (ETT) and general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a large sample retrospective, propensity score-matched (PSM) study. We collected the data of 6739 female patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between January 2016 and June 2021 in our hospital, China. Patients were divided into two groups (ETT group and LMA group) according to different airway management modes. Data on all perioperative adverse events were collected. PSM analysis was performed to control confounding factors and differences in baseline values between the two groups. Finally, 4150 female patients were recruited after PSM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of patients taking intraoperative vasoactive drugs during surgery was higher in the ETT group than in the LMA group (<i>P</i> = 0.04). The LMA group had a higher incidence of vomiting (51 [2.46%]) and somnolence (165 [7.95]) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) than the ETT group (71 [3.42%] and 102 [4.92%], respectively) (<i>P</i> = 0.02 and <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hypothermia was significantly higher in the LMA group (183 [10.36%]) than in the ETT group (173 [8.34%]) in the PACU (<i>P</i> = 0.03). The number of patients with sore throat was significantly higher in the ETT group (434 [20.02%]) than in the LMA group (299 [14.41%]) in the ward (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Other variables such as hypoxemia, moderate to severe pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, sleep disorders, wound bleeding, and skin itch were not significantly different between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ETT group had more incidences of vomiting, sore throat, and cough complications and needed more drug treatment than the LMA group. LMA is a better airway management mode and LMA general anesthesia can be safely used in patients undergoing laparoscopic nonemergency hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway for general anesthesia on perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yanan Jia, Yu Zhang, Zihan Wang, Wei Pan, Haifeng Fu, Wenwen Du\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrms.jrms_384_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare perioperative adverse events between general anesthesia with endotracheal tube (ETT) and general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a large sample retrospective, propensity score-matched (PSM) study. We collected the data of 6739 female patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between January 2016 and June 2021 in our hospital, China. Patients were divided into two groups (ETT group and LMA group) according to different airway management modes. Data on all perioperative adverse events were collected. PSM analysis was performed to control confounding factors and differences in baseline values between the two groups. Finally, 4150 female patients were recruited after PSM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of patients taking intraoperative vasoactive drugs during surgery was higher in the ETT group than in the LMA group (<i>P</i> = 0.04). The LMA group had a higher incidence of vomiting (51 [2.46%]) and somnolence (165 [7.95]) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) than the ETT group (71 [3.42%] and 102 [4.92%], respectively) (<i>P</i> = 0.02 and <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hypothermia was significantly higher in the LMA group (183 [10.36%]) than in the ETT group (173 [8.34%]) in the PACU (<i>P</i> = 0.03). The number of patients with sore throat was significantly higher in the ETT group (434 [20.02%]) than in the LMA group (299 [14.41%]) in the ward (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Other variables such as hypoxemia, moderate to severe pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, sleep disorders, wound bleeding, and skin itch were not significantly different between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ETT group had more incidences of vomiting, sore throat, and cough complications and needed more drug treatment than the LMA group. LMA is a better airway management mode and LMA general anesthesia can be safely used in patients undergoing laparoscopic nonemergency hysterectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953732/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_384_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_384_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:比较在腹腔镜子宫切除术患者中使用气管插管(ETT)全身麻醉和使用喉罩气道(LMA)全身麻醉的围术期不良事件:这是一项大样本回顾性倾向评分匹配(PSM)研究。我们收集了 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间在我院接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的 6739 名女性患者的数据。根据不同的气道管理模式将患者分为两组(ETT组和LMA组)。收集了所有围手术期不良事件的数据。进行 PSM 分析以控制混杂因素和两组间基线值的差异。最后,经过PSM分析,共招募了4150名女性患者:结果:术中服用血管活性药物的患者总数,ETT 组高于 LMA 组(P = 0.04)。与 ETT 组(分别为 71 [3.42%] 和 102 [4.92%])相比,LMA 组在麻醉后护理病房(PACU)的呕吐(51 [2.46%])和嗜睡(165 [7.95])发生率更高(P = 0.02 和 P <0.001)。在 PACU,LMA 组的低体温率(183 [10.36%])明显高于 ETT 组(173 [8.34%])(P = 0.03)。在病房中,ETT 组喉咙痛患者人数(434 [20.02%])明显高于 LMA 组(299 [14.41%])(P < 0.001)。低氧血症、中度至重度疼痛、腹胀、腹泻、睡眠障碍、伤口出血和皮肤瘙痒等其他变量在两组间无显著差异(P > 0.05):结论:与 LMA 组相比,ETT 组的呕吐、咽喉痛和咳嗽并发症发生率更高,需要的药物治疗也更多。LMA是一种更好的气道管理模式,腹腔镜非急诊子宫切除术患者可安全使用LMA全身麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway for general anesthesia on perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Background: To compare perioperative adverse events between general anesthesia with endotracheal tube (ETT) and general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Materials and methods: This was a large sample retrospective, propensity score-matched (PSM) study. We collected the data of 6739 female patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between January 2016 and June 2021 in our hospital, China. Patients were divided into two groups (ETT group and LMA group) according to different airway management modes. Data on all perioperative adverse events were collected. PSM analysis was performed to control confounding factors and differences in baseline values between the two groups. Finally, 4150 female patients were recruited after PSM.

Results: The total number of patients taking intraoperative vasoactive drugs during surgery was higher in the ETT group than in the LMA group (P = 0.04). The LMA group had a higher incidence of vomiting (51 [2.46%]) and somnolence (165 [7.95]) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) than the ETT group (71 [3.42%] and 102 [4.92%], respectively) (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001). Hypothermia was significantly higher in the LMA group (183 [10.36%]) than in the ETT group (173 [8.34%]) in the PACU (P = 0.03). The number of patients with sore throat was significantly higher in the ETT group (434 [20.02%]) than in the LMA group (299 [14.41%]) in the ward (P < 0.001). Other variables such as hypoxemia, moderate to severe pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, sleep disorders, wound bleeding, and skin itch were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The ETT group had more incidences of vomiting, sore throat, and cough complications and needed more drug treatment than the LMA group. LMA is a better airway management mode and LMA general anesthesia can be safely used in patients undergoing laparoscopic nonemergency hysterectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信