与伴侣动物共同生活的中风幸存者的认知功能和参与度:一项横断面研究

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Naor Demeter, Sigal Zilcha-Mano, Sandra Zukerman, Naomi Josman
{"title":"与伴侣动物共同生活的中风幸存者的认知功能和参与度:一项横断面研究","authors":"Naor Demeter, Sigal Zilcha-Mano, Sandra Zukerman, Naomi Josman","doi":"10.1177/21501319241240356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>Companion animals (CAs) may benefit human health, but few studies have examined their impact on stroke survivors. This study examines participation, quality of life (QoL), attachment, cognition, and executive function differences between stroke survivors living with and without CAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional, community-setting study, 25 stroke survivors with a CA and a matched group of 27 without a CA completed standard tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stroke survivors with a CA scored significantly higher in participation and 1 cognitive performance test. No significant differences were found in other cognitive measures or QoL, and attachment to a CA was not correlated with participation or QoL within the research group. However, lower attachment <i>avoidance</i> correlated with better participation in survivors living with dogs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Living with CAs, especially dogs, might be associated with some cognitive function and participation benefits among stroke survivors. The link between CAs and cognitive function is unclear: Survivors with higher cognitive functioning might be more capable of caring for a CA, or having and caring for a CA might promote better cognitive function. Attachment patterns also might explain stroke survivors' participation levels. Further study is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"21501319241240356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Function and Participation of Stroke Survivors Living With Companion Animals: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Naor Demeter, Sigal Zilcha-Mano, Sandra Zukerman, Naomi Josman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21501319241240356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>Companion animals (CAs) may benefit human health, but few studies have examined their impact on stroke survivors. This study examines participation, quality of life (QoL), attachment, cognition, and executive function differences between stroke survivors living with and without CAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional, community-setting study, 25 stroke survivors with a CA and a matched group of 27 without a CA completed standard tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stroke survivors with a CA scored significantly higher in participation and 1 cognitive performance test. No significant differences were found in other cognitive measures or QoL, and attachment to a CA was not correlated with participation or QoL within the research group. However, lower attachment <i>avoidance</i> correlated with better participation in survivors living with dogs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Living with CAs, especially dogs, might be associated with some cognitive function and participation benefits among stroke survivors. The link between CAs and cognitive function is unclear: Survivors with higher cognitive functioning might be more capable of caring for a CA, or having and caring for a CA might promote better cognitive function. Attachment patterns also might explain stroke survivors' participation levels. Further study is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"21501319241240356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241240356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241240356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言/目的:伴侣动物(CA)可能有益于人类健康,但很少有研究探讨其对中风幸存者的影响。本研究探讨了有伴侣动物和没有伴侣动物的中风幸存者在参与、生活质量(QoL)、依恋、认知和执行功能方面的差异:在这项以社区为背景的横断面研究中,25 名有 CA 的中风幸存者和 27 名没有 CA 的匹配组完成了标准工具:结果:有 CA 的中风幸存者在参与度和一项认知能力测试中得分明显更高。在其他认知测量或 QoL 方面未发现明显差异,在研究组中,对 CA 的依恋与参与度或 QoL 无关。然而,与狗生活在一起的幸存者中,依恋回避程度越低,参与度越高:结论:与 CA(尤其是狗)生活在一起可能会对中风幸存者的认知功能和参与度有所帮助。CA 与认知功能之间的联系尚不清楚:认知功能较高的幸存者可能更有能力照顾 CA,或者拥有和照顾 CA 会促进认知功能的提高。依恋模式也可以解释中风幸存者的参与水平。还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Function and Participation of Stroke Survivors Living With Companion Animals: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction/objectives: Companion animals (CAs) may benefit human health, but few studies have examined their impact on stroke survivors. This study examines participation, quality of life (QoL), attachment, cognition, and executive function differences between stroke survivors living with and without CAs.

Methods: In this cross-sectional, community-setting study, 25 stroke survivors with a CA and a matched group of 27 without a CA completed standard tools.

Results: Stroke survivors with a CA scored significantly higher in participation and 1 cognitive performance test. No significant differences were found in other cognitive measures or QoL, and attachment to a CA was not correlated with participation or QoL within the research group. However, lower attachment avoidance correlated with better participation in survivors living with dogs.

Conclusion: Living with CAs, especially dogs, might be associated with some cognitive function and participation benefits among stroke survivors. The link between CAs and cognitive function is unclear: Survivors with higher cognitive functioning might be more capable of caring for a CA, or having and caring for a CA might promote better cognitive function. Attachment patterns also might explain stroke survivors' participation levels. Further study is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信