方案:在健康专业教育课程中,学习者-教育者共同创建学生评估:范围审查协议

IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Laura A. Killam, Rylan Egan, Christina Godfrey, Amanda Ross-White, Pilar Camargo-Plazas, Mercedes Lock, Marian Luctkar-Flude
{"title":"方案:在健康专业教育课程中,学习者-教育者共同创建学生评估:范围审查协议","authors":"Laura A. Killam,&nbsp;Rylan Egan,&nbsp;Christina Godfrey,&nbsp;Amanda Ross-White,&nbsp;Pilar Camargo-Plazas,&nbsp;Mercedes Lock,&nbsp;Marian Luctkar-Flude","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is a protocol for a Campbell Review following JBI scoping review methodology. The objectives are to answer the following questions: What has been reported in the literature about collaborative learner-educator design, implementation, or evaluation of learner assessment in health professional education? (1) Where is learner-educator co-creation of assessment occurring? (i.e., which disciplines, course types, level of learner, year of study). (2) What course assessment decisions are influenced or being made together? (i.e., assessment instructions and/or grades). (3) How much influence do learners have on decision-making? (i.e., where does it fall on Bovill and Bulley's ladder of participation). (4) How do learners and educators go about making decisions together? (i.e., discussion or voting, with a whole class or portion of the class). (5) What are the perceived benefits, disadvantages, barriers, and/or facilitators reported by the authors?</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1392","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROTOCOL: Learner-educator co-creation of student assessment in health professional education courses: A scoping review protocol\",\"authors\":\"Laura A. Killam,&nbsp;Rylan Egan,&nbsp;Christina Godfrey,&nbsp;Amanda Ross-White,&nbsp;Pilar Camargo-Plazas,&nbsp;Mercedes Lock,&nbsp;Marian Luctkar-Flude\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cl2.1392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This is a protocol for a Campbell Review following JBI scoping review methodology. The objectives are to answer the following questions: What has been reported in the literature about collaborative learner-educator design, implementation, or evaluation of learner assessment in health professional education? (1) Where is learner-educator co-creation of assessment occurring? (i.e., which disciplines, course types, level of learner, year of study). (2) What course assessment decisions are influenced or being made together? (i.e., assessment instructions and/or grades). (3) How much influence do learners have on decision-making? (i.e., where does it fall on Bovill and Bulley's ladder of participation). (4) How do learners and educators go about making decisions together? (i.e., discussion or voting, with a whole class or portion of the class). (5) What are the perceived benefits, disadvantages, barriers, and/or facilitators reported by the authors?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Campbell Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1392\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Campbell Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是按照 JBI 范围审查方法进行坎贝尔审查的协议。目的是回答以下问题:关于健康职业教育中学习者-教育者合作设计、实施或评估学习者评估的文献报道有哪些?(1) 学习者--教育者共同创建的评估发生在哪里?(即哪些学科、课程类型、学习者水平、学习年份)。(2) 哪些课程评估决策受到影响或正在共同做出?(即评估说明和/或成绩)。(3) 学习者对决策的影响有多大? (即在 Bovill 和 Bulley 的参与阶梯上的位置)。(4) 学习者和教育者如何共同决策?(即全班或部分班级进行讨论或投票)。(5) 作者认为参与有哪些好处、坏处、障碍和/或促进因素?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

PROTOCOL: Learner-educator co-creation of student assessment in health professional education courses: A scoping review protocol

PROTOCOL: Learner-educator co-creation of student assessment in health professional education courses: A scoping review protocol

This is a protocol for a Campbell Review following JBI scoping review methodology. The objectives are to answer the following questions: What has been reported in the literature about collaborative learner-educator design, implementation, or evaluation of learner assessment in health professional education? (1) Where is learner-educator co-creation of assessment occurring? (i.e., which disciplines, course types, level of learner, year of study). (2) What course assessment decisions are influenced or being made together? (i.e., assessment instructions and/or grades). (3) How much influence do learners have on decision-making? (i.e., where does it fall on Bovill and Bulley's ladder of participation). (4) How do learners and educators go about making decisions together? (i.e., discussion or voting, with a whole class or portion of the class). (5) What are the perceived benefits, disadvantages, barriers, and/or facilitators reported by the authors?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信