我们准备好在胎儿血液采样中广泛使用乳酸POCT了吗?新型statstrip POCT分析仪的分析和临床验证

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Nienke Spronk , Madeleine SQ. Kortenhorst , Jasmijn A. van Balveren
{"title":"我们准备好在胎儿血液采样中广泛使用乳酸POCT了吗?新型statstrip POCT分析仪的分析和临床验证","authors":"Nienke Spronk ,&nbsp;Madeleine SQ. Kortenhorst ,&nbsp;Jasmijn A. van Balveren","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Currently, pH values are used in fetal scalp blood sampling as a parameter to rule out fetal distress during the delivery. Due to a high number of pre-analytical errors in pH measurements, lactate measurement is already extensively examined as an alternative. Our objectives were to confirm the analytical performance of the StatStrip lactate POCT analyzer and to compare pH and lactate as a marker of fetal distress.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p><em>and methods</em>: Fetal blood scalp, umbilical and arterial blood test results (n = 100) were analyzed to compare the current POC blood gas analyzer including lactate (iSTAT-1) with the new POCT analyzer (StatStrip) to test the analytical performance. Furthermore, in all fetal scalp blood tests with a lactate en pH measurement from 2021 to 2023, clinical delivery data was collected to perform a clinical verification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The lactate concentration on the StatStrip analyzer correlated well with the iSTAT-1 (Pearson's r ≥ 0.95). 73 Fetal scalp blood tests showed 18% discrepant results when comparing pH and lactate with regard to fetal distress and consequent delivery intervention. Lactate showed more false positive results than pH (4 versus 1), but no false negatives as opposed to pH (0 versus 1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lactate Statstrip and iSTAT-1 POCT analyzers were analytically equivalent. The clinical verification study showed that lactate is a good predictor of fetal distress, although more false positive results were found in our limited dataset. However, unnecessary interventions due to failed pH measurements might be prevented when a lactate measurement is introduced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000210/pdfft?md5=264c8d80341769c182b509e0f7e6321b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000210-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are we ready for widespread implementation of lactate POCT in fetal blood sampling? An analytical and clinical verification of the novel statstrip POCT analyzer\",\"authors\":\"Nienke Spronk ,&nbsp;Madeleine SQ. Kortenhorst ,&nbsp;Jasmijn A. van Balveren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Currently, pH values are used in fetal scalp blood sampling as a parameter to rule out fetal distress during the delivery. Due to a high number of pre-analytical errors in pH measurements, lactate measurement is already extensively examined as an alternative. Our objectives were to confirm the analytical performance of the StatStrip lactate POCT analyzer and to compare pH and lactate as a marker of fetal distress.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p><em>and methods</em>: Fetal blood scalp, umbilical and arterial blood test results (n = 100) were analyzed to compare the current POC blood gas analyzer including lactate (iSTAT-1) with the new POCT analyzer (StatStrip) to test the analytical performance. Furthermore, in all fetal scalp blood tests with a lactate en pH measurement from 2021 to 2023, clinical delivery data was collected to perform a clinical verification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The lactate concentration on the StatStrip analyzer correlated well with the iSTAT-1 (Pearson's r ≥ 0.95). 73 Fetal scalp blood tests showed 18% discrepant results when comparing pH and lactate with regard to fetal distress and consequent delivery intervention. Lactate showed more false positive results than pH (4 versus 1), but no false negatives as opposed to pH (0 versus 1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lactate Statstrip and iSTAT-1 POCT analyzers were analytically equivalent. The clinical verification study showed that lactate is a good predictor of fetal distress, although more false positive results were found in our limited dataset. However, unnecessary interventions due to failed pH measurements might be prevented when a lactate measurement is introduced.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000210/pdfft?md5=264c8d80341769c182b509e0f7e6321b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000210-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的目前,pH 值是胎儿头皮血液采样中用来排除分娩过程中胎儿窘迫的一个参数。由于 pH 值测量中存在大量分析前误差,乳酸测量作为一种替代方法已被广泛研究。我们的目标是确认StatStrip乳酸POCT分析仪的分析性能,并比较作为胎儿窘迫标志物的pH值和乳酸:我们对胎儿头皮血、脐血和动脉血检测结果(n = 100)进行了分析,将包括乳酸在内的现有 POC 血气分析仪(iSTAT-1)与新型 POCT 分析仪(StatStrip)进行了比较,以测试其分析性能。此外,在 2021 年至 2023 年期间进行的所有胎儿头皮血液检测中,都进行了乳酸盐和 pH 值测量,并收集了临床分娩数据,以进行临床验证。结果StatStrip 分析仪的乳酸盐浓度与 iSTAT-1 的相关性良好(皮尔逊 r ≥ 0.95)。73 在比较 pH 值和乳酸与胎儿窘迫及随后的分娩干预时,胎儿头皮血液检测显示 18% 的结果不一致。结论乳酸 Statstrip 和 iSTAT-1 POCT 分析仪的分析结果相当。临床验证研究表明,乳酸是预测胎儿窘迫的良好指标,尽管在我们有限的数据集中发现了更多的假阳性结果。不过,如果引入乳酸测量,可能会避免因 pH 值测量失败而进行不必要的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are we ready for widespread implementation of lactate POCT in fetal blood sampling? An analytical and clinical verification of the novel statstrip POCT analyzer

Objectives

Currently, pH values are used in fetal scalp blood sampling as a parameter to rule out fetal distress during the delivery. Due to a high number of pre-analytical errors in pH measurements, lactate measurement is already extensively examined as an alternative. Our objectives were to confirm the analytical performance of the StatStrip lactate POCT analyzer and to compare pH and lactate as a marker of fetal distress.

Design

and methods: Fetal blood scalp, umbilical and arterial blood test results (n = 100) were analyzed to compare the current POC blood gas analyzer including lactate (iSTAT-1) with the new POCT analyzer (StatStrip) to test the analytical performance. Furthermore, in all fetal scalp blood tests with a lactate en pH measurement from 2021 to 2023, clinical delivery data was collected to perform a clinical verification.

Results

The lactate concentration on the StatStrip analyzer correlated well with the iSTAT-1 (Pearson's r ≥ 0.95). 73 Fetal scalp blood tests showed 18% discrepant results when comparing pH and lactate with regard to fetal distress and consequent delivery intervention. Lactate showed more false positive results than pH (4 versus 1), but no false negatives as opposed to pH (0 versus 1).

Conclusions

The lactate Statstrip and iSTAT-1 POCT analyzers were analytically equivalent. The clinical verification study showed that lactate is a good predictor of fetal distress, although more false positive results were found in our limited dataset. However, unnecessary interventions due to failed pH measurements might be prevented when a lactate measurement is introduced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信