状态性癫痫的脑连接性可预测预后:弥散张量成像研究

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dong Ah Lee, Ho-Joon Lee, Kang Min Park
{"title":"状态性癫痫的脑连接性可预测预后:弥散张量成像研究","authors":"Dong Ah Lee,&nbsp;Ho-Joon Lee,&nbsp;Kang Min Park","doi":"10.1111/jon.13196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to explore structural connectivity in status epilepticus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled participants who underwent diffusion tensor imaging. We applied graph theory to investigate structural connectivity. We compared the structural connectivity measures between patients and healthy controls and between patients with poor (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] &gt;3) and good (mRS ≤3) admission outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled 28 patients and 31 healthy controls (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, <i>p</i> = .438). Of these patients, 16 and 12 showed poor and good admission outcome (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, <i>p</i> = .438). The assortative coefficient (−0.113 vs. −0.121, <i>p</i> = .021), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .009), global efficiency (0.023 vs.0.020, <i>p</i> = .009), transitivity (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .009), and small-worldness index (0.006 vs.0.005, <i>p</i> = .021) were higher in patients with status epilepticus than in healthy controls. The assortative coefficient (−0.108 vs. −0.119, <i>p</i> = .042), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .042), and transitivity (0.008 vs.0.007, <i>p</i> = .042) were higher in patients with poor admission outcome than in those with good admission outcome. MRS score was positively correlated with structural connectivity measures, including the assortative coefficient (<i>r</i> = 0.615, <i>p</i> = .003), mean clustering coefficient (<i>r</i> = 0.544, <i>p</i> = .005), global efficiency (<i>r</i> = 0.515, <i>p</i> = .007), transitivity (<i>r</i> = 0.547, <i>p</i> = .007), and small-worldness index (<i>r</i> = 0.435, <i>p</i> = .024).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We revealed alterations in structural connectivity, showing increased integration and segregation in status epilepticus, which might be related with neuronal synchronization. This effect was more pronounced in patients with a poor admission outcome, potentially reshaping our understanding for comprehension of status epilepticus mechanisms and the development of more targeted treatments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"34 3","pages":"393-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain connectivity in status epilepticus as a predictor of outcome: A diffusion tensor imaging study\",\"authors\":\"Dong Ah Lee,&nbsp;Ho-Joon Lee,&nbsp;Kang Min Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jon.13196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>We aimed to explore structural connectivity in status epilepticus.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We enrolled participants who underwent diffusion tensor imaging. We applied graph theory to investigate structural connectivity. We compared the structural connectivity measures between patients and healthy controls and between patients with poor (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] &gt;3) and good (mRS ≤3) admission outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We enrolled 28 patients and 31 healthy controls (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, <i>p</i> = .438). Of these patients, 16 and 12 showed poor and good admission outcome (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, <i>p</i> = .438). The assortative coefficient (−0.113 vs. −0.121, <i>p</i> = .021), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .009), global efficiency (0.023 vs.0.020, <i>p</i> = .009), transitivity (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .009), and small-worldness index (0.006 vs.0.005, <i>p</i> = .021) were higher in patients with status epilepticus than in healthy controls. The assortative coefficient (−0.108 vs. −0.119, <i>p</i> = .042), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, <i>p</i> = .042), and transitivity (0.008 vs.0.007, <i>p</i> = .042) were higher in patients with poor admission outcome than in those with good admission outcome. MRS score was positively correlated with structural connectivity measures, including the assortative coefficient (<i>r</i> = 0.615, <i>p</i> = .003), mean clustering coefficient (<i>r</i> = 0.544, <i>p</i> = .005), global efficiency (<i>r</i> = 0.515, <i>p</i> = .007), transitivity (<i>r</i> = 0.547, <i>p</i> = .007), and small-worldness index (<i>r</i> = 0.435, <i>p</i> = .024).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We revealed alterations in structural connectivity, showing increased integration and segregation in status epilepticus, which might be related with neuronal synchronization. This effect was more pronounced in patients with a poor admission outcome, potentially reshaping our understanding for comprehension of status epilepticus mechanisms and the development of more targeted treatments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"393-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13196\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:我们旨在探索癫痫状态的结构连接性:我们招募了接受弥散张量成像的参与者。我们应用图论研究结构连通性。我们比较了患者与健康对照组之间以及入院预后较差(改良Rankin量表[mRS] >3)和较好(mRS ≤3)的患者之间的结构连通性测量结果:我们共招募了 28 名患者和 31 名健康对照者(年龄分别为 65.5 岁和 62.0 岁,P = .438)。在这些患者中,分别有 16 人和 12 人的入院预后较差和较好(年龄为 65.5 岁对 62.0 岁,P = .438)。同类系数(-0.113 vs. -0.121,p = .021)、平均聚类系数(0.007 vs. 0.006,p = .009)、全局效率(0.023 vs. 0.020,p = .0090.020, p = .009)、传递性(0.007 vs. 0.006, p = .009)和小世界指数(0.006 vs. 0.005, p = .021)在癫痫状态患者中均高于健康对照组。入院预后差的患者的同类系数(-0.108 vs. -0.119,p = .042)、平均聚类系数(0.007 vs. 0.006,p = .042)和转运性(0.008 vs. 0.007,p = .042)均高于入院预后好的患者。MRS评分与结构连通性指标呈正相关,包括同类系数(r = 0.615,p = .003)、平均聚类系数(r = 0.544,p = .005)、全局效率(r = 0.515,p = .007)、转运性(r = 0.547,p = .007)和小世界指数(r = 0.435,p = .024):我们发现了结构连接的改变,显示癫痫状态患者的整合和分离增加,这可能与神经元同步化有关。这种效应在入院结果不佳的患者中更为明显,有可能重塑我们对癫痫状态机制的理解,并开发出更有针对性的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brain connectivity in status epilepticus as a predictor of outcome: A diffusion tensor imaging study

Background and Purpose

We aimed to explore structural connectivity in status epilepticus.

Methods

We enrolled participants who underwent diffusion tensor imaging. We applied graph theory to investigate structural connectivity. We compared the structural connectivity measures between patients and healthy controls and between patients with poor (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] >3) and good (mRS ≤3) admission outcomes.

Results

We enrolled 28 patients and 31 healthy controls (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, p = .438). Of these patients, 16 and 12 showed poor and good admission outcome (age 65.5 vs.62.0 years, p = .438). The assortative coefficient (−0.113 vs. −0.121, p = .021), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, p = .009), global efficiency (0.023 vs.0.020, p = .009), transitivity (0.007 vs.0.006, p = .009), and small-worldness index (0.006 vs.0.005, p = .021) were higher in patients with status epilepticus than in healthy controls. The assortative coefficient (−0.108 vs. −0.119, p = .042), mean clustering coefficient (0.007 vs.0.006, p = .042), and transitivity (0.008 vs.0.007, p = .042) were higher in patients with poor admission outcome than in those with good admission outcome. MRS score was positively correlated with structural connectivity measures, including the assortative coefficient (r = 0.615, p = .003), mean clustering coefficient (r = 0.544, p = .005), global efficiency (r = 0.515, p = .007), transitivity (r = 0.547, p = .007), and small-worldness index (r = 0.435, p = .024).

Conclusion

We revealed alterations in structural connectivity, showing increased integration and segregation in status epilepticus, which might be related with neuronal synchronization. This effect was more pronounced in patients with a poor admission outcome, potentially reshaping our understanding for comprehension of status epilepticus mechanisms and the development of more targeted treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroimaging
Journal of Neuroimaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on: MRI CT Carotid Ultrasound and TCD SPECT PET Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology Functional MRI Xenon CT and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信