双任务活动对智障人士和非智障人士步态参数的影响。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
J. C. Cabrera-Linares, P. Á. Latorre Román, J. A. Párraga Montilla, K. E. Andrade-Lara, F. J. Ruiz-Peralvarez, C. Gutierrez-Cruz
{"title":"双任务活动对智障人士和非智障人士步态参数的影响。","authors":"J. C. Cabrera-Linares,&nbsp;P. Á. Latorre Román,&nbsp;J. A. Párraga Montilla,&nbsp;K. E. Andrade-Lara,&nbsp;F. J. Ruiz-Peralvarez,&nbsp;C. Gutierrez-Cruz","doi":"10.1111/jir.13134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The main objective of this study was to evaluate gait parameters in people with intellectual disability (ID) and without intellectual disability (WID) in two different walking conditions [single task vs. dual task (DT)]. A secondary aim was to evaluate the dual-task cost (DTC) that the DT causes in each group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 119 participants joined in this study: 56 ID (30 men) and 63 WID (30 men). The OptoGait system was used to assess gait. In addition, Witty photocells were added to assess gait under the DT condition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Single support time was lower for participants with ID (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01), while double support time was higher (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). All coefficients of variation for gait parameters were higher in participants with ID. Additionally, changes in gait were observed in both groups during the DT condition compared with the single-task condition. These changes were larger for participants with ID in step length, double support time and gait speed (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), resulting in a higher DTC in these variables in the ID group (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both groups reduced gait performance in the DT condition. However, greater gait variability occurred in the ID group. In addition, DTC was higher for the ID group in all variables analysed. Therefore, people with ID show worse gait performance during a DT than people WID.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":"68 6","pages":"610-619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13134","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a dual-task activity on gait parameters of people with and without intellectual disabilities\",\"authors\":\"J. C. Cabrera-Linares,&nbsp;P. Á. Latorre Román,&nbsp;J. A. Párraga Montilla,&nbsp;K. E. Andrade-Lara,&nbsp;F. J. Ruiz-Peralvarez,&nbsp;C. Gutierrez-Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.13134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The main objective of this study was to evaluate gait parameters in people with intellectual disability (ID) and without intellectual disability (WID) in two different walking conditions [single task vs. dual task (DT)]. A secondary aim was to evaluate the dual-task cost (DTC) that the DT causes in each group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 119 participants joined in this study: 56 ID (30 men) and 63 WID (30 men). The OptoGait system was used to assess gait. In addition, Witty photocells were added to assess gait under the DT condition.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Single support time was lower for participants with ID (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01), while double support time was higher (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). All coefficients of variation for gait parameters were higher in participants with ID. Additionally, changes in gait were observed in both groups during the DT condition compared with the single-task condition. These changes were larger for participants with ID in step length, double support time and gait speed (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), resulting in a higher DTC in these variables in the ID group (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both groups reduced gait performance in the DT condition. However, greater gait variability occurred in the ID group. In addition, DTC was higher for the ID group in all variables analysed. Therefore, people with ID show worse gait performance during a DT than people WID.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\"68 6\",\"pages\":\"610-619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13134\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13134\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究的主要目的是评估智障人士(ID)和非智障人士(WID)在两种不同行走条件(单一任务与双重任务(DT))下的步态参数。另一个目的是评估 DT 在每组中造成的双重任务成本(DTC):本研究共有 119 名参与者:方法:共有 119 名参与者参加了这项研究:56 名 ID(30 名男性)和 63 名 WID(30 名男性)。采用 OptoGait 系统对步态进行评估。此外,还增加了 Witty 光电传感器,以评估 DT 条件下的步态:结果:ID 患者的单次支撑时间更短(P 结论:ID 患者的单次支撑时间更短;WID 患者的单次支撑时间更长:两组人在 DT 条件下的步态表现都有所下降。然而,ID 组的步态变异性更大。此外,在所有分析变量中,智障组的 DTC 都更高。因此,与智障者相比,智障者在 DT 条件下的步态表现更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of a dual-task activity on gait parameters of people with and without intellectual disabilities

Effects of a dual-task activity on gait parameters of people with and without intellectual disabilities

Background

The main objective of this study was to evaluate gait parameters in people with intellectual disability (ID) and without intellectual disability (WID) in two different walking conditions [single task vs. dual task (DT)]. A secondary aim was to evaluate the dual-task cost (DTC) that the DT causes in each group.

Methods

A total of 119 participants joined in this study: 56 ID (30 men) and 63 WID (30 men). The OptoGait system was used to assess gait. In addition, Witty photocells were added to assess gait under the DT condition.

Results

Single support time was lower for participants with ID (P < 0.01), while double support time was higher (P < 0.05). All coefficients of variation for gait parameters were higher in participants with ID. Additionally, changes in gait were observed in both groups during the DT condition compared with the single-task condition. These changes were larger for participants with ID in step length, double support time and gait speed (P < 0.001), resulting in a higher DTC in these variables in the ID group (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Both groups reduced gait performance in the DT condition. However, greater gait variability occurred in the ID group. In addition, DTC was higher for the ID group in all variables analysed. Therefore, people with ID show worse gait performance during a DT than people WID.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信