校准变值人口伦理学的建议

Dean Spears, H. Orri Stefánsson
{"title":"校准变值人口伦理学的建议","authors":"Dean Spears, H. Orri Stefánsson","doi":"10.1017/s0266267124000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Variable-Value axiologies avoid Parfit’s <span>Repugnant Conclusion</span> while satisfying some weak instances of the <span>Mere Addition</span> principle. We apply calibration methods to two leading members of the family of Variable-Value views conditional upon: first, a very weak instance of Mere Addition and, second, some plausible empirical assumptions about the size and welfare of the intertemporal world population. We find that such facts calibrate these two Variable-Value views to be nearly totalist, and therefore imply conclusions that should seem repugnant to anyone who opposes Total Utilitarianism only due to the Repugnant Conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":501336,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Philosophy","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What calibrating variable-value population ethics suggests\",\"authors\":\"Dean Spears, H. Orri Stefánsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0266267124000026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Variable-Value axiologies avoid Parfit’s <span>Repugnant Conclusion</span> while satisfying some weak instances of the <span>Mere Addition</span> principle. We apply calibration methods to two leading members of the family of Variable-Value views conditional upon: first, a very weak instance of Mere Addition and, second, some plausible empirical assumptions about the size and welfare of the intertemporal world population. We find that such facts calibrate these two Variable-Value views to be nearly totalist, and therefore imply conclusions that should seem repugnant to anyone who opposes Total Utilitarianism only due to the Repugnant Conclusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267124000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267124000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可变价值公理避免了帕菲特的 "令人厌恶的结论"(Repugnant Conclusion),同时满足了 "纯粹加法 "原则的某些弱实例。我们将校准方法应用于可变价值观点家族中的两个主要成员,其条件是:第一,一个非常弱的 "纯粹加法 "实例;第二,一些关于跨时空世界人口规模和福利的可信经验假设。我们发现,这些事实将这两种可变价值观点校准为近乎完全主义的观点,因此,对于那些仅仅因为 "令人厌恶的结论 "而反对完全功利主义的人来说,这些结论似乎是令人厌恶的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What calibrating variable-value population ethics suggests

Variable-Value axiologies avoid Parfit’s Repugnant Conclusion while satisfying some weak instances of the Mere Addition principle. We apply calibration methods to two leading members of the family of Variable-Value views conditional upon: first, a very weak instance of Mere Addition and, second, some plausible empirical assumptions about the size and welfare of the intertemporal world population. We find that such facts calibrate these two Variable-Value views to be nearly totalist, and therefore imply conclusions that should seem repugnant to anyone who opposes Total Utilitarianism only due to the Repugnant Conclusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信