南非湿地保护和管理政策与法律框架分析

Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule
{"title":"南非湿地保护和管理政策与法律框架分析","authors":"Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule","doi":"10.1016/j.wsee.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>South Africa has a wealth of wetlands that provide a range of environmental, cultural and economic goods and services. In recognition of the importance of wetlands, South Africa has been a member of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (also referred to as the Ramsar Convention) since 1975. Apart from this international commitment, South Africa has developed an array of environmental laws and policies that serve as instruments for protecting and managing wetlands. The study aimed to analyse the strengths and limitations of South Africa’s environmental policies and legislative framework that promotes wetland protection and management. The Constitution and nine environmental national laws with provisions relating to wetland conservation and management were thus purposefully selected and analysed qualitatively. The study found that there is no stand-alone wetland policy that protects wetlands; rather, several sectoral policies integrate objectives relating to wetland conservation in the country including those that cover agriculture, the environment, biodiversity and water. This multiplicity means there are no unified management objectives for wetlands protection and conservation. The study also found that there is a lack of harmonisation of policies and legislation, inadequate intergovernmental coordination and no integrated monitoring among the government departments involved. The study concludes that this disjointed and incoherent approach to wetlands conservation and management has weakened the effectiveness of the legal framework and this has obstructed their effectiveness in protecting this sensitive ecosystem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101280,"journal":{"name":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 63-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471424000020/pdfft?md5=2d3121543a6b0c8fb0c6366bad92f1fc&pid=1-s2.0-S2589471424000020-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of policy and legal framework on wetland conservation and management in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsee.2024.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>South Africa has a wealth of wetlands that provide a range of environmental, cultural and economic goods and services. In recognition of the importance of wetlands, South Africa has been a member of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (also referred to as the Ramsar Convention) since 1975. Apart from this international commitment, South Africa has developed an array of environmental laws and policies that serve as instruments for protecting and managing wetlands. The study aimed to analyse the strengths and limitations of South Africa’s environmental policies and legislative framework that promotes wetland protection and management. The Constitution and nine environmental national laws with provisions relating to wetland conservation and management were thus purposefully selected and analysed qualitatively. The study found that there is no stand-alone wetland policy that protects wetlands; rather, several sectoral policies integrate objectives relating to wetland conservation in the country including those that cover agriculture, the environment, biodiversity and water. This multiplicity means there are no unified management objectives for wetlands protection and conservation. The study also found that there is a lack of harmonisation of policies and legislation, inadequate intergovernmental coordination and no integrated monitoring among the government departments involved. The study concludes that this disjointed and incoherent approach to wetlands conservation and management has weakened the effectiveness of the legal framework and this has obstructed their effectiveness in protecting this sensitive ecosystem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Watershed Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 63-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471424000020/pdfft?md5=2d3121543a6b0c8fb0c6366bad92f1fc&pid=1-s2.0-S2589471424000020-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Watershed Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471424000020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471424000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南非拥有丰富的湿地,可提供一系列环境、文化和经济产品与服务。鉴于湿地的重要性,南非自 1975 年以来一直是《拉姆萨尔国际重要湿地公约》(又称《拉姆萨尔公约》)的成员。除这一国际承诺外,南非还制定了一系列环境法律和政策,作为保护和管理湿地的工具。本研究旨在分析南非促进湿地保护和管理的环境政策和立法框架的优势和局限性。因此,有目的地选择了《宪法》和九部载有湿地保护和管理相关条款的国家环境法,并对其进行了定性分析。研究发现,该国没有独立的湿地保护政策;相反,若干部门政策整合了与湿地保护有关的目标,包括涉及农业、环境、生物多样性和水的政策。这种多重性意味着没有统一的湿地保护和养护管理目标。研究还发现,政策和立法缺乏统一性,政府间协调不足,相关政府部门之间也没有进行综合监测。研究得出结论,这种脱节和不连贯的湿地保护和管理方法削弱了法律框架的有效性,阻碍了其保护这一敏感生态系统的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of policy and legal framework on wetland conservation and management in South Africa

South Africa has a wealth of wetlands that provide a range of environmental, cultural and economic goods and services. In recognition of the importance of wetlands, South Africa has been a member of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (also referred to as the Ramsar Convention) since 1975. Apart from this international commitment, South Africa has developed an array of environmental laws and policies that serve as instruments for protecting and managing wetlands. The study aimed to analyse the strengths and limitations of South Africa’s environmental policies and legislative framework that promotes wetland protection and management. The Constitution and nine environmental national laws with provisions relating to wetland conservation and management were thus purposefully selected and analysed qualitatively. The study found that there is no stand-alone wetland policy that protects wetlands; rather, several sectoral policies integrate objectives relating to wetland conservation in the country including those that cover agriculture, the environment, biodiversity and water. This multiplicity means there are no unified management objectives for wetlands protection and conservation. The study also found that there is a lack of harmonisation of policies and legislation, inadequate intergovernmental coordination and no integrated monitoring among the government departments involved. The study concludes that this disjointed and incoherent approach to wetlands conservation and management has weakened the effectiveness of the legal framework and this has obstructed their effectiveness in protecting this sensitive ecosystem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信