用于药物流行病学研究的结构化电子健康记录中哺乳期信息的特征和验证。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-17 DOI:10.1111/ppe.13051
Hibo H Mohamed, Kirsten Ehresmann, Elisabeth M Seburg, Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez, Ellen W Demerath, David A Fields, Kimberly K Vesco, Elyse O Kharbanda, Kristin Palmsten
{"title":"用于药物流行病学研究的结构化电子健康记录中哺乳期信息的特征和验证。","authors":"Hibo H Mohamed, Kirsten Ehresmann, Elisabeth M Seburg, Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez, Ellen W Demerath, David A Fields, Kimberly K Vesco, Elyse O Kharbanda, Kristin Palmsten","doi":"10.1111/ppe.13051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breastfeeding information stored within electronic health records (EHR) has recently been used for pharmacoepidemiological research, however the data are primarily collected for clinical care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterise breastfeeding information recorded in structured fields in EHR during infant and postpartum health care visits, and to assess the validity of lactation status based on EHR data versus maternal report at research study visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed breastfeeding information recorded in structured fields in EHR from one health system for a subset of 211 patients who were also enrolled in a study on breast milk composition between 2014 and 2017 that required participants to exclusively breastfeed their infants until at least 1 month of age. We assessed the frequency of breastfeeding information in EHR during the first 12 months of age and compared lactation status based on EHR with maternal report at 1 and 6-month study visits (reference standard).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median number of breastfeeding records in the EHR per infant was six (interquartile range 3) with most observations clustering in the first few weeks of life and around well-infant visits. At the 6-month study visit, 93.8% of participants were breastfeeding and 80.1% were exclusively breastfeeding according to maternal report. Sensitivity of EHR data for identifying ever breastfeeding was at or near 100%, and sensitivity for identifying ever exclusive breastfeeding was 98.0% (95% CI: 95.0%, 99.2%). Sensitivities were 97.3% (95% CI: 93.9%, 98.9%) for identifying any breastfeeding and 94.4% (95% CI: 89.7%, 97.0%) for exclusive breastfeeding, and positive predictive values were 99.5% (95% CI: 97.0%, 99.9%) for any breastfeeding and 95.0% (95% CI: 90.4%, 97.4%) for exclusive breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breastfeeding information in structured EHR fields have the potential to accurately classify lactation status. The validity of these data should be assessed in populations with a lower breastfeeding prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterisation and validation of lactation information from structured electronic health records for use in pharmacoepidemiological studies.\",\"authors\":\"Hibo H Mohamed, Kirsten Ehresmann, Elisabeth M Seburg, Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez, Ellen W Demerath, David A Fields, Kimberly K Vesco, Elyse O Kharbanda, Kristin Palmsten\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ppe.13051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breastfeeding information stored within electronic health records (EHR) has recently been used for pharmacoepidemiological research, however the data are primarily collected for clinical care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterise breastfeeding information recorded in structured fields in EHR during infant and postpartum health care visits, and to assess the validity of lactation status based on EHR data versus maternal report at research study visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed breastfeeding information recorded in structured fields in EHR from one health system for a subset of 211 patients who were also enrolled in a study on breast milk composition between 2014 and 2017 that required participants to exclusively breastfeed their infants until at least 1 month of age. We assessed the frequency of breastfeeding information in EHR during the first 12 months of age and compared lactation status based on EHR with maternal report at 1 and 6-month study visits (reference standard).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median number of breastfeeding records in the EHR per infant was six (interquartile range 3) with most observations clustering in the first few weeks of life and around well-infant visits. At the 6-month study visit, 93.8% of participants were breastfeeding and 80.1% were exclusively breastfeeding according to maternal report. Sensitivity of EHR data for identifying ever breastfeeding was at or near 100%, and sensitivity for identifying ever exclusive breastfeeding was 98.0% (95% CI: 95.0%, 99.2%). Sensitivities were 97.3% (95% CI: 93.9%, 98.9%) for identifying any breastfeeding and 94.4% (95% CI: 89.7%, 97.0%) for exclusive breastfeeding, and positive predictive values were 99.5% (95% CI: 97.0%, 99.9%) for any breastfeeding and 95.0% (95% CI: 90.4%, 97.4%) for exclusive breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breastfeeding information in structured EHR fields have the potential to accurately classify lactation status. The validity of these data should be assessed in populations with a lower breastfeeding prevalence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:存储在电子健康档案(EHR)中的母乳喂养信息最近被用于药物流行病学研究,但这些数据主要是为临床护理收集的:目的:描述婴儿和产后保健就诊时电子病历结构化字段中记录的母乳喂养信息的特征,并评估基于电子病历数据和研究就诊时产妇报告的哺乳状况的有效性:我们评估了一个医疗系统的电子病历结构化字段中记录的母乳喂养信息,这些信息来自 2014 年至 2017 年间参加母乳成分研究的 211 名患者。我们评估了婴儿出生后 12 个月内电子病历中母乳喂养信息的频率,并将电子病历中的泌乳状况与产妇在 1 个月和 6 个月研究访问中的报告(参考标准)进行了比较:每个婴儿的电子健康记录中母乳喂养记录的中位数为 6 条(四分位数间距为 3),大部分记录集中在婴儿出生后的头几周和婴儿健康检查前后。在为期 6 个月的研究访问中,93.8% 的参与者进行了母乳喂养,根据母亲的报告,80.1% 的参与者进行了纯母乳喂养。电子病历数据识别曾经母乳喂养的灵敏度达到或接近 100%,识别曾经纯母乳喂养的灵敏度为 98.0% (95% CI: 95.0%, 99.2%)。识别任何母乳喂养的灵敏度为 97.3% (95% CI: 93.9%, 98.9%),识别纯母乳喂养的灵敏度为 94.4% (95% CI: 89.7%, 97.0%),识别任何母乳喂养的阳性预测值为 99.5% (95% CI: 97.0%, 99.9%),识别纯母乳喂养的阳性预测值为 95.0% (95% CI: 90.4%, 97.4%):结论:结构化电子病历字段中的母乳喂养信息有可能对哺乳状态进行准确分类。应在母乳喂养率较低的人群中评估这些数据的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterisation and validation of lactation information from structured electronic health records for use in pharmacoepidemiological studies.

Background: Breastfeeding information stored within electronic health records (EHR) has recently been used for pharmacoepidemiological research, however the data are primarily collected for clinical care.

Objectives: To characterise breastfeeding information recorded in structured fields in EHR during infant and postpartum health care visits, and to assess the validity of lactation status based on EHR data versus maternal report at research study visits.

Methods: We assessed breastfeeding information recorded in structured fields in EHR from one health system for a subset of 211 patients who were also enrolled in a study on breast milk composition between 2014 and 2017 that required participants to exclusively breastfeed their infants until at least 1 month of age. We assessed the frequency of breastfeeding information in EHR during the first 12 months of age and compared lactation status based on EHR with maternal report at 1 and 6-month study visits (reference standard).

Results: The median number of breastfeeding records in the EHR per infant was six (interquartile range 3) with most observations clustering in the first few weeks of life and around well-infant visits. At the 6-month study visit, 93.8% of participants were breastfeeding and 80.1% were exclusively breastfeeding according to maternal report. Sensitivity of EHR data for identifying ever breastfeeding was at or near 100%, and sensitivity for identifying ever exclusive breastfeeding was 98.0% (95% CI: 95.0%, 99.2%). Sensitivities were 97.3% (95% CI: 93.9%, 98.9%) for identifying any breastfeeding and 94.4% (95% CI: 89.7%, 97.0%) for exclusive breastfeeding, and positive predictive values were 99.5% (95% CI: 97.0%, 99.9%) for any breastfeeding and 95.0% (95% CI: 90.4%, 97.4%) for exclusive breastfeeding.

Conclusions: Breastfeeding information in structured EHR fields have the potential to accurately classify lactation status. The validity of these data should be assessed in populations with a lower breastfeeding prevalence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology crosses the boundaries between the epidemiologist and the paediatrician, obstetrician or specialist in child health, ensuring that important paediatric and perinatal studies reach those clinicians for whom the results are especially relevant. In addition to original research articles, the Journal also includes commentaries, book reviews and annotations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信