Siying Chen, Pieter De Frenne, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Qiqian Wu, Yan Peng, Haifeng Zheng, Kun Guo, Chaoxiang Yuan, Ling Xiong, Zemin Zhao, Xiangyin Ni, Fuzhong Wu, Kai Yue
{"title":"宏观气候和冠层特征调节中国各地林下小气候温度偏差","authors":"Siying Chen, Pieter De Frenne, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Qiqian Wu, Yan Peng, Haifeng Zheng, Kun Guo, Chaoxiang Yuan, Ling Xiong, Zemin Zhao, Xiangyin Ni, Fuzhong Wu, Kai Yue","doi":"10.1111/geb.13830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest microclimates can contrast substantially from the macroclimate outside forests. These microclimates regulate understory biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Studies have quantified the global patterns and driving factors of forest understory temperature offsets, but data from China were almost missing, making the global assessment incomplete. To fill this knowledge gap, we quantitatively synthesized 494 paired observations from China extracted from 91 publications to quantify mean (<i>T</i><sub>mean</sub>), maximum (<i>T</i><sub>max</sub>) and minimum temperature offsets (<i>T</i><sub>min</sub>). Results showed that (1) forest canopies significantly buffered understory <i>T</i><sub>mean</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> against macroclimatic temperature, with average offsets of 1.0 and 1.5°C, respectively, while understory <i>T</i><sub>min</sub> offsets were not significantly different from zero; (2) forest type (broadleaved, mixed, vs. coniferous) and forest location (rural vs. urban) did not affect <i>T</i><sub>mean</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> or <i>T</i><sub>min</sub> offsets, but climate zone and season showed significant impacts; and (3) macroclimatic temperature, wind speed, tree height and canopy density also impacted temperature offsets, although their effects varied among <i>T</i><sub>mean</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>. Our results complement the global assessment of forest buffering capacity, and reiterate the necessity for incorporating microclimatic variability into future bioclimatic modelling of species demography and distributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macroclimate and canopy characteristics regulate forest understory microclimatic temperature offsets across China\",\"authors\":\"Siying Chen, Pieter De Frenne, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Qiqian Wu, Yan Peng, Haifeng Zheng, Kun Guo, Chaoxiang Yuan, Ling Xiong, Zemin Zhao, Xiangyin Ni, Fuzhong Wu, Kai Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Forest microclimates can contrast substantially from the macroclimate outside forests. These microclimates regulate understory biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Studies have quantified the global patterns and driving factors of forest understory temperature offsets, but data from China were almost missing, making the global assessment incomplete. To fill this knowledge gap, we quantitatively synthesized 494 paired observations from China extracted from 91 publications to quantify mean (<i>T</i><sub>mean</sub>), maximum (<i>T</i><sub>max</sub>) and minimum temperature offsets (<i>T</i><sub>min</sub>). Results showed that (1) forest canopies significantly buffered understory <i>T</i><sub>mean</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> against macroclimatic temperature, with average offsets of 1.0 and 1.5°C, respectively, while understory <i>T</i><sub>min</sub> offsets were not significantly different from zero; (2) forest type (broadleaved, mixed, vs. coniferous) and forest location (rural vs. urban) did not affect <i>T</i><sub>mean</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> or <i>T</i><sub>min</sub> offsets, but climate zone and season showed significant impacts; and (3) macroclimatic temperature, wind speed, tree height and canopy density also impacted temperature offsets, although their effects varied among <i>T</i><sub>mean</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>min</sub>. Our results complement the global assessment of forest buffering capacity, and reiterate the necessity for incorporating microclimatic variability into future bioclimatic modelling of species demography and distributions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13830\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13830","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Macroclimate and canopy characteristics regulate forest understory microclimatic temperature offsets across China
Forest microclimates can contrast substantially from the macroclimate outside forests. These microclimates regulate understory biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Studies have quantified the global patterns and driving factors of forest understory temperature offsets, but data from China were almost missing, making the global assessment incomplete. To fill this knowledge gap, we quantitatively synthesized 494 paired observations from China extracted from 91 publications to quantify mean (Tmean), maximum (Tmax) and minimum temperature offsets (Tmin). Results showed that (1) forest canopies significantly buffered understory Tmean and Tmax against macroclimatic temperature, with average offsets of 1.0 and 1.5°C, respectively, while understory Tmin offsets were not significantly different from zero; (2) forest type (broadleaved, mixed, vs. coniferous) and forest location (rural vs. urban) did not affect Tmean, Tmax or Tmin offsets, but climate zone and season showed significant impacts; and (3) macroclimatic temperature, wind speed, tree height and canopy density also impacted temperature offsets, although their effects varied among Tmean, Tmax and Tmin. Our results complement the global assessment of forest buffering capacity, and reiterate the necessity for incorporating microclimatic variability into future bioclimatic modelling of species demography and distributions.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.