Stephen Bennie, James Douglas Crowley, Tian Wang, Matthew Henry Pelletier, William Robert Walsh
{"title":"聚氨酯泡沫块中的椎弓根螺钉拔出测试:泡沫块方向和密度的影响","authors":"Stephen Bennie, James Douglas Crowley, Tian Wang, Matthew Henry Pelletier, William Robert Walsh","doi":"10.1177/09544119241236873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synthetic bone models such as polyurethane (PU) foam are a well-established substitute to cadaveric bone for screw pull-out testing; however, little attention has been given to the effect of PU foam anisotropy on orthopaedic implant testing. Compressive and screw pull-out performance in three PU foam densities; 0.16 g/cm<sup>3</sup> (PCF 10), 0.32 g/cm<sup>3</sup> (PCF 20) and 0.64 g/cm<sup>3</sup> (PCF 40) were performed in each of the X, Y or Z orientations. The maximum compressive force, stiffness in the linear region, maximum stress and modulus were determined for all compression tests. Pedicle screws were inserted and pulled out axially to determine maximum pull-out force, energy to failure and stiffness. One-way ANOVA and post hoc tests were used to compare outcome variables between PU foam densities and orientations, respectively. Compression tests demonstrated the maximum force was significantly different between all orientations for PCF 20 (X, Y and Z) while stiffness and maximum stress were different between X versus Y and X versus Z. Maximum pull-out force was significantly different between all orientations for PCF 10 foam. No significant differences were noted for other foam densities. There is potential for screw pull-out testing results to be significantly affected by orientation in lower density PU foams. It is recommended that a single, known orientation of the PU foam block be used for experimental testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"455-460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pedicle screw pull-out testing in polyurethane foam blocks: Effect of block orientation and density.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Bennie, James Douglas Crowley, Tian Wang, Matthew Henry Pelletier, William Robert Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09544119241236873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Synthetic bone models such as polyurethane (PU) foam are a well-established substitute to cadaveric bone for screw pull-out testing; however, little attention has been given to the effect of PU foam anisotropy on orthopaedic implant testing. Compressive and screw pull-out performance in three PU foam densities; 0.16 g/cm<sup>3</sup> (PCF 10), 0.32 g/cm<sup>3</sup> (PCF 20) and 0.64 g/cm<sup>3</sup> (PCF 40) were performed in each of the X, Y or Z orientations. The maximum compressive force, stiffness in the linear region, maximum stress and modulus were determined for all compression tests. Pedicle screws were inserted and pulled out axially to determine maximum pull-out force, energy to failure and stiffness. One-way ANOVA and post hoc tests were used to compare outcome variables between PU foam densities and orientations, respectively. Compression tests demonstrated the maximum force was significantly different between all orientations for PCF 20 (X, Y and Z) while stiffness and maximum stress were different between X versus Y and X versus Z. Maximum pull-out force was significantly different between all orientations for PCF 10 foam. No significant differences were noted for other foam densities. There is potential for screw pull-out testing results to be significantly affected by orientation in lower density PU foams. It is recommended that a single, known orientation of the PU foam block be used for experimental testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"455-460\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119241236873\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119241236873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
聚氨酯(PU)泡沫等合成骨模型是用于螺钉拔出测试的尸体骨的成熟替代品;然而,人们很少关注聚氨酯泡沫各向异性对骨科植入物测试的影响。在三种聚氨酯泡沫密度(0.16 克/立方厘米(PCF 10)、0.32 克/立方厘米(PCF 20)和 0.64 克/立方厘米(PCF 40))下,分别从 X、Y 或 Z 方向进行了压缩和螺钉拔出性能测试。所有压缩试验的最大压缩力、线性区域刚度、最大应力和模量均已确定。插入椎弓根螺钉并将其轴向拔出,以测定最大拔出力、失效能量和刚度。单因素方差分析和事后检验分别用于比较聚氨酯泡沫密度和方向之间的结果变量。压缩测试表明,PCF 20(X、Y 和 Z)的最大拉力在所有方向上都有显著差异,而刚度和最大应力则在 X 与 Y 和 X 与 Z 之间存在差异。其他泡沫密度没有明显差异。在密度较低的聚氨酯泡沫中,螺钉拉拔测试结果可能会受到取向的显著影响。建议在实验测试中使用已知取向的聚氨酯泡沫块。
Pedicle screw pull-out testing in polyurethane foam blocks: Effect of block orientation and density.
Synthetic bone models such as polyurethane (PU) foam are a well-established substitute to cadaveric bone for screw pull-out testing; however, little attention has been given to the effect of PU foam anisotropy on orthopaedic implant testing. Compressive and screw pull-out performance in three PU foam densities; 0.16 g/cm3 (PCF 10), 0.32 g/cm3 (PCF 20) and 0.64 g/cm3 (PCF 40) were performed in each of the X, Y or Z orientations. The maximum compressive force, stiffness in the linear region, maximum stress and modulus were determined for all compression tests. Pedicle screws were inserted and pulled out axially to determine maximum pull-out force, energy to failure and stiffness. One-way ANOVA and post hoc tests were used to compare outcome variables between PU foam densities and orientations, respectively. Compression tests demonstrated the maximum force was significantly different between all orientations for PCF 20 (X, Y and Z) while stiffness and maximum stress were different between X versus Y and X versus Z. Maximum pull-out force was significantly different between all orientations for PCF 10 foam. No significant differences were noted for other foam densities. There is potential for screw pull-out testing results to be significantly affected by orientation in lower density PU foams. It is recommended that a single, known orientation of the PU foam block be used for experimental testing.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.