在青少年精神科住院病房实施患者报告结果测量:可行性研究。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Services Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1037/ser0000851
Carl Waitz, Annmarie Caracansi, Katy Kaufman, Emily Campbell, Ethan Anglemyer, Yohanis Anglero-Diaz, Sherry Paden, Billy Zou, Patricia Ibeziako
{"title":"在青少年精神科住院病房实施患者报告结果测量:可行性研究。","authors":"Carl Waitz, Annmarie Caracansi, Katy Kaufman, Emily Campbell, Ethan Anglemyer, Yohanis Anglero-Diaz, Sherry Paden, Billy Zou, Patricia Ibeziako","doi":"10.1037/ser0000851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the feasibility of implementing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures with adolescents on an inpatient psychiatry service. During the study period (March 8, 2021, to June 7, 2022), a total of 154 patient encounters were recorded for adolescents between 12 and 17 years of age. PROs were piloted during the first 3 months of the study period, with a focus on technical implementation. In the 12 months from June 8, 2021, through June 7, 2022, the PRO project moved to full implementation across all patient encounters. Fisher's exact test and independent t tests were conducted to examine the differences between patients who completed the PROs and patients who did not complete them to determine the representativeness of the sample receiving them. During the 3-month pilot period, 31.8% of patients completed the PROs at admission and discharge, while during the 12-month full implementation, 74.5% of patients completed them at both time points. Statistical tests showed no significant diagnostic, sex, or race/ethnicity differences between patients who received and did not receive the outcome measures. Even without funding, small inpatient psychiatry services for adolescents can feasibly implement PROs with completion rates similar to other published studies and capture the majority of the patients served. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"112-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing patient-reported outcome measures on an adolescent inpatient psychiatry unit: A feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Carl Waitz, Annmarie Caracansi, Katy Kaufman, Emily Campbell, Ethan Anglemyer, Yohanis Anglero-Diaz, Sherry Paden, Billy Zou, Patricia Ibeziako\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article examines the feasibility of implementing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures with adolescents on an inpatient psychiatry service. During the study period (March 8, 2021, to June 7, 2022), a total of 154 patient encounters were recorded for adolescents between 12 and 17 years of age. PROs were piloted during the first 3 months of the study period, with a focus on technical implementation. In the 12 months from June 8, 2021, through June 7, 2022, the PRO project moved to full implementation across all patient encounters. Fisher's exact test and independent t tests were conducted to examine the differences between patients who completed the PROs and patients who did not complete them to determine the representativeness of the sample receiving them. During the 3-month pilot period, 31.8% of patients completed the PROs at admission and discharge, while during the 12-month full implementation, 74.5% of patients completed them at both time points. Statistical tests showed no significant diagnostic, sex, or race/ethnicity differences between patients who received and did not receive the outcome measures. Even without funding, small inpatient psychiatry services for adolescents can feasibly implement PROs with completion rates similar to other published studies and capture the majority of the patients served. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"112-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000851\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了对住院精神病学服务中的青少年实施患者报告结果(PRO)测量的可行性。在研究期间(2021 年 3 月 8 日至 2022 年 6 月 7 日),共记录了 154 次与 12 至 17 岁青少年患者的接触。在研究期的前 3 个月,对 PROs 进行了试点,重点是技术实施。在 2021 年 6 月 8 日至 2022 年 6 月 7 日的 12 个月内,PRO 项目在所有患者就诊过程中全面实施。研究人员通过费雪精确检验和独立 t 检验来检验完成 PROs 的患者与未完成 PROs 的患者之间的差异,以确定接受 PROs 的样本的代表性。在为期 3 个月的试点期间,31.8% 的患者在入院和出院时填写了 PROs,而在为期 12 个月的全面实施期间,74.5% 的患者在两个时间点均填写了 PROs。统计测试表明,接受和未接受结果测量的患者在诊断、性别或种族/民族方面没有明显差异。即使没有资金支持,小型青少年精神科住院服务机构也可以实施PROs,其完成率与其他已发表的研究结果类似,并能获得大多数患者的服务。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing patient-reported outcome measures on an adolescent inpatient psychiatry unit: A feasibility study.

This article examines the feasibility of implementing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures with adolescents on an inpatient psychiatry service. During the study period (March 8, 2021, to June 7, 2022), a total of 154 patient encounters were recorded for adolescents between 12 and 17 years of age. PROs were piloted during the first 3 months of the study period, with a focus on technical implementation. In the 12 months from June 8, 2021, through June 7, 2022, the PRO project moved to full implementation across all patient encounters. Fisher's exact test and independent t tests were conducted to examine the differences between patients who completed the PROs and patients who did not complete them to determine the representativeness of the sample receiving them. During the 3-month pilot period, 31.8% of patients completed the PROs at admission and discharge, while during the 12-month full implementation, 74.5% of patients completed them at both time points. Statistical tests showed no significant diagnostic, sex, or race/ethnicity differences between patients who received and did not receive the outcome measures. Even without funding, small inpatient psychiatry services for adolescents can feasibly implement PROs with completion rates similar to other published studies and capture the majority of the patients served. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信