通过使用电阻抗断层扫描评估整体和区域通气情况,实现慢性阻塞性肺病患者抿唇呼吸的可视化。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Lin Yang, Zhijun Gao, Xinsheng Cao, Chunchen Wang, Hang Wang, Jing Dai, Yang Liu, Yilong Qin, Meng Dai, Binghua Zhang, Ke Zhao, Zhanqi Zhao
{"title":"通过使用电阻抗断层扫描评估整体和区域通气情况,实现慢性阻塞性肺病患者抿唇呼吸的可视化。","authors":"Lin Yang, Zhijun Gao, Xinsheng Cao, Chunchen Wang, Hang Wang, Jing Dai, Yang Liu, Yilong Qin, Meng Dai, Binghua Zhang, Ke Zhao, Zhanqi Zhao","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ad33a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. This study aims to explore the possibility of using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to assess pursed lips breathing (PLB) performance of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).<i>Methods</i>. 32 patients with COPD were assigned equally to either the conventional group or the EIT guided group. All patients were taught to perform PLB by a physiotherapist without EIT in the conventional group or with EIT in the EIT guided group for 10 min. The ventilation of all patients in the final test were continuously monitored using EIT and the PLB performances were rated by another physiotherapist before and after reviewing EIT. The global and regional ventilation between two groups as well as between quite breathing (QB) and PLB were compared and rating scores with and without EIT were also compared.<i>Results.</i>For global ventilation, the inspiratory depth and the ratio of expiratory-to-inspiratory time during PLB was significantly larger than those during QB for both group (<i>P</i>< 0.001). The inspiratory depth and the ratio of expiratory-to-inspiratory time during PLB in the EIT guided group were higher compared to those in the conventional group (<i>P</i>< 0.001), as well as expiratory flow expiratory uniformity and respiratory stability were better (<i>P</i>< 0.001). For regional ventilation, center of ventilation significantly decreased during PLB (<i>P</i>< 0.05). The expiratory time constant during PLB in the EIT guided group was greater than that in the conventional group (<i>P</i>< 0.001). Additionally, Bland-Altman plots analysis suggested a high concordance between subjective rating and rating with the help of EIT, but the score rated after EIT observation significantly lower than that rated subjectively in both groups (score drop of -2.68 ± 1.1 in the conventional group and -1.19 ± 0.72 in the EIT guided group,<i>P</i>< 0.01).<i>Conclusion.</i>EIT could capture the details of PLB maneuver, which might be a potential tool to quantitatively evaluate PLB performance and thus assist physiotherapists to teach PLB maneuver to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualizing pursed lips breathing of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through evaluation of global and regional ventilation using electrical impedance tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Lin Yang, Zhijun Gao, Xinsheng Cao, Chunchen Wang, Hang Wang, Jing Dai, Yang Liu, Yilong Qin, Meng Dai, Binghua Zhang, Ke Zhao, Zhanqi Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6579/ad33a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. This study aims to explore the possibility of using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to assess pursed lips breathing (PLB) performance of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).<i>Methods</i>. 32 patients with COPD were assigned equally to either the conventional group or the EIT guided group. All patients were taught to perform PLB by a physiotherapist without EIT in the conventional group or with EIT in the EIT guided group for 10 min. The ventilation of all patients in the final test were continuously monitored using EIT and the PLB performances were rated by another physiotherapist before and after reviewing EIT. The global and regional ventilation between two groups as well as between quite breathing (QB) and PLB were compared and rating scores with and without EIT were also compared.<i>Results.</i>For global ventilation, the inspiratory depth and the ratio of expiratory-to-inspiratory time during PLB was significantly larger than those during QB for both group (<i>P</i>< 0.001). The inspiratory depth and the ratio of expiratory-to-inspiratory time during PLB in the EIT guided group were higher compared to those in the conventional group (<i>P</i>< 0.001), as well as expiratory flow expiratory uniformity and respiratory stability were better (<i>P</i>< 0.001). For regional ventilation, center of ventilation significantly decreased during PLB (<i>P</i>< 0.05). The expiratory time constant during PLB in the EIT guided group was greater than that in the conventional group (<i>P</i>< 0.001). Additionally, Bland-Altman plots analysis suggested a high concordance between subjective rating and rating with the help of EIT, but the score rated after EIT observation significantly lower than that rated subjectively in both groups (score drop of -2.68 ± 1.1 in the conventional group and -1.19 ± 0.72 in the EIT guided group,<i>P</i>< 0.01).<i>Conclusion.</i>EIT could capture the details of PLB maneuver, which might be a potential tool to quantitatively evaluate PLB performance and thus assist physiotherapists to teach PLB maneuver to patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad33a1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad33a1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 本研究旨在探讨使用电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者做肺活量测定的可能性。在传统组中,所有患者均由物理治疗师在不使用 EIT 的情况下教其进行 PLB;在 EIT 指导组中,所有患者均由物理治疗师在使用 EIT 的情况下教其进行 PLB,时间为 10 分钟。在最后的测试中,所有患者的通气情况均由 EIT 持续监测,并由另一名物理治疗师在复查 EIT 前后对 PLB 表演进行评分。比较了两组之间以及相当呼吸(QB)和 PLB 之间的整体和区域通气情况,还比较了使用 EIT 和未使用 EIT 的评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visualizing pursed lips breathing of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through evaluation of global and regional ventilation using electrical impedance tomography.

Objective. This study aims to explore the possibility of using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to assess pursed lips breathing (PLB) performance of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Methods. 32 patients with COPD were assigned equally to either the conventional group or the EIT guided group. All patients were taught to perform PLB by a physiotherapist without EIT in the conventional group or with EIT in the EIT guided group for 10 min. The ventilation of all patients in the final test were continuously monitored using EIT and the PLB performances were rated by another physiotherapist before and after reviewing EIT. The global and regional ventilation between two groups as well as between quite breathing (QB) and PLB were compared and rating scores with and without EIT were also compared.Results.For global ventilation, the inspiratory depth and the ratio of expiratory-to-inspiratory time during PLB was significantly larger than those during QB for both group (P< 0.001). The inspiratory depth and the ratio of expiratory-to-inspiratory time during PLB in the EIT guided group were higher compared to those in the conventional group (P< 0.001), as well as expiratory flow expiratory uniformity and respiratory stability were better (P< 0.001). For regional ventilation, center of ventilation significantly decreased during PLB (P< 0.05). The expiratory time constant during PLB in the EIT guided group was greater than that in the conventional group (P< 0.001). Additionally, Bland-Altman plots analysis suggested a high concordance between subjective rating and rating with the help of EIT, but the score rated after EIT observation significantly lower than that rated subjectively in both groups (score drop of -2.68 ± 1.1 in the conventional group and -1.19 ± 0.72 in the EIT guided group,P< 0.01).Conclusion.EIT could capture the details of PLB maneuver, which might be a potential tool to quantitatively evaluate PLB performance and thus assist physiotherapists to teach PLB maneuver to patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信