亚历山大-汉密尔顿的宪法判例与银行法案

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1093/ajlh/njae002

Peter Charles Hoffer

{"title":"亚历山大-汉密尔顿的宪法判例与银行法案","authors":"Peter Charles Hoffer","doi":"10.1093/ajlh/njae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alexander Hamilton's view of law was more than pragmatic. Forward looking, and innovative, it saw law as a creative tool. Often misread, and dismissed, as mere policy preference, it was in fact sophisticated and superbly articulated jurisprudence. In the years between the ratification debate and the proposal for the First Bank of the United States, Hamilton displayed this jurisprudence to great effect.","PeriodicalId":54164,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alexander Hamilton's Constitutional Jurisprudence and the Bank Bill\",\"authors\":\"Peter Charles Hoffer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajlh/njae002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Alexander Hamilton's view of law was more than pragmatic. Forward looking, and innovative, it saw law as a creative tool. Often misread, and dismissed, as mere policy preference, it was in fact sophisticated and superbly articulated jurisprudence. In the years between the ratification debate and the proposal for the First Bank of the United States, Hamilton displayed this jurisprudence to great effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/njae002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/njae002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

亚历山大-汉密尔顿的法律观不仅仅是实用主义的。他高瞻远瞩，勇于创新，将法律视为一种创造性的工具。汉密尔顿的法律观常常被误读为单纯的政策偏好，但实际上，它是一种成熟的、表述精湛的法理学。在批准法案的辩论和美国第一银行提案之间的几年里，汉密尔顿将这一法学理念发挥得淋漓尽致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Alexander Hamilton's Constitutional Jurisprudence and the Bank Bill

Alexander Hamilton's view of law was more than pragmatic. Forward looking, and innovative, it saw law as a creative tool. Often misread, and dismissed, as mere policy preference, it was in fact sophisticated and superbly articulated jurisprudence. In the years between the ratification debate and the proposal for the First Bank of the United States, Hamilton displayed this jurisprudence to great effect.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY LAW-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The American Journal of Legal History was established in 1957 as the first English-language legal history journal. The journal remains devoted to the publication of articles and documents on the history of all legal systems. The journal is refereed, and members of the Judiciary and the Bar form the advisory board.