儿科调制弧全身照射(MATBI)中踝关节和足部栓剂的评估。

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hannah Hering BRadTherapy (Hons), Beth Effeney BAppSc (MRT-RT), MPH, Carole Brady BAppSc (MRT-RT), GCertHSC (Ed), MTrainDev (Rsch), Catriona Hargrave BAppSc (MRT-RT), MAppSc (Research), PhD
{"title":"儿科调制弧全身照射(MATBI)中踝关节和足部栓剂的评估。","authors":"Hannah Hering BRadTherapy (Hons),&nbsp;Beth Effeney BAppSc (MRT-RT), MPH,&nbsp;Carole Brady BAppSc (MRT-RT), GCertHSC (Ed), MTrainDev (Rsch),&nbsp;Catriona Hargrave BAppSc (MRT-RT), MAppSc (Research), PhD","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective planning study aimed to evaluate the role of bolus in achieving dose uniformity in the ankles and feet in paediatric patients undergoing Modulated Arc Total Body Irradiation (MATBI) treatment and to identify patient factors that may negate or warrant its use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The clinically treated plans of 20 paediatric patients who received MATBI treatment utilising ankle and foot bolus (Bolus plan) were compared with two retrospectively generated plans; a plan with bolus removed and no re-optimisation (No Bolus plan), and a re-optimised plan without bolus attempting to achieve equal dosimetry to the clinical plan via monitor unit adjustment (MU plan). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the dose uniformity criteria of ±10% coverage of the reference dose (RD) for each subregion of the ankle and foot for the three plans. The impact of patient height, weight, and age at the time of treatment was evaluated using Spearman's correlation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Variation in doses &gt;10% RD was minimal across the three plans, with an average D1cc difference &lt; 0.4Gy. For the ankle and foot regions in the Bolus plans, the volume receiving at least 90% of the RD (V90) was on average &gt; 92%. In No Bolus and MU plans, there was an average reduction of 24.5% and 23.2% V90 coverage respectively in the toes. Spearman's correlation suggests height has the strongest relationship to D1cc.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study validated the continued use of ankle and foot bolus to achieve dosimetric goals for paediatric MATBI treatments, particularly V90 coverage across all heights.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 3","pages":"355-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.780","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of ankle and foot bolus in paediatric modulated arc total body irradiation (MATBI)\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Hering BRadTherapy (Hons),&nbsp;Beth Effeney BAppSc (MRT-RT), MPH,&nbsp;Carole Brady BAppSc (MRT-RT), GCertHSC (Ed), MTrainDev (Rsch),&nbsp;Catriona Hargrave BAppSc (MRT-RT), MAppSc (Research), PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmrs.780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective planning study aimed to evaluate the role of bolus in achieving dose uniformity in the ankles and feet in paediatric patients undergoing Modulated Arc Total Body Irradiation (MATBI) treatment and to identify patient factors that may negate or warrant its use.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The clinically treated plans of 20 paediatric patients who received MATBI treatment utilising ankle and foot bolus (Bolus plan) were compared with two retrospectively generated plans; a plan with bolus removed and no re-optimisation (No Bolus plan), and a re-optimised plan without bolus attempting to achieve equal dosimetry to the clinical plan via monitor unit adjustment (MU plan). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the dose uniformity criteria of ±10% coverage of the reference dose (RD) for each subregion of the ankle and foot for the three plans. The impact of patient height, weight, and age at the time of treatment was evaluated using Spearman's correlation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Variation in doses &gt;10% RD was minimal across the three plans, with an average D1cc difference &lt; 0.4Gy. For the ankle and foot regions in the Bolus plans, the volume receiving at least 90% of the RD (V90) was on average &gt; 92%. In No Bolus and MU plans, there was an average reduction of 24.5% and 23.2% V90 coverage respectively in the toes. Spearman's correlation suggests height has the strongest relationship to D1cc.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study validated the continued use of ankle and foot bolus to achieve dosimetric goals for paediatric MATBI treatments, particularly V90 coverage across all heights.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"71 3\",\"pages\":\"355-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.780\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.780\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:这项回顾性计划研究旨在评估栓剂在使接受调强弧全身照射(MATBI)治疗的儿科患者的脚踝和脚部剂量均匀性方面的作用,并评估栓剂对治疗的影响:这项回顾性计划研究旨在评估栓剂在实现接受调强弧全身照射(MATBI)治疗的儿科患者踝关节和足部剂量均匀性方面的作用,并确定可能否定或需要使用栓剂的患者因素:将 20 名接受调强弧全身照射(MATBI)治疗的儿科患者的临床治疗计划(使用踝关节和足部栓剂的计划)与两个回顾性生成的计划进行比较;一个是去除栓剂且未重新优化的计划(无栓剂计划),另一个是未使用栓剂的重新优化计划,该计划试图通过监测单元调整(MU 计划)实现与临床计划相同的剂量测定。使用描述性统计来评估三种计划的剂量均匀性标准,即踝关节和足部每个亚区的参考剂量 (RD) 覆盖率为 ±10%。使用斯皮尔曼相关性评估了治疗时患者身高、体重和年龄的影响:结果:三种方案中 RD >10% 的剂量差异极小,平均 D1cc 差异为 92%。在无 Bolus 和 MU 方案中,脚趾的 V90 覆盖率平均分别减少了 24.5% 和 23.2%。斯皮尔曼相关性表明,身高与 D1cc 的关系最为密切:这项研究验证了继续使用踝关节和足部栓剂来实现儿科 MATBI 治疗的剂量目标,尤其是所有身高的 V90 覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An evaluation of ankle and foot bolus in paediatric modulated arc total body irradiation (MATBI)

An evaluation of ankle and foot bolus in paediatric modulated arc total body irradiation (MATBI)

Introduction

This retrospective planning study aimed to evaluate the role of bolus in achieving dose uniformity in the ankles and feet in paediatric patients undergoing Modulated Arc Total Body Irradiation (MATBI) treatment and to identify patient factors that may negate or warrant its use.

Methods

The clinically treated plans of 20 paediatric patients who received MATBI treatment utilising ankle and foot bolus (Bolus plan) were compared with two retrospectively generated plans; a plan with bolus removed and no re-optimisation (No Bolus plan), and a re-optimised plan without bolus attempting to achieve equal dosimetry to the clinical plan via monitor unit adjustment (MU plan). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the dose uniformity criteria of ±10% coverage of the reference dose (RD) for each subregion of the ankle and foot for the three plans. The impact of patient height, weight, and age at the time of treatment was evaluated using Spearman's correlation.

Results

Variation in doses >10% RD was minimal across the three plans, with an average D1cc difference < 0.4Gy. For the ankle and foot regions in the Bolus plans, the volume receiving at least 90% of the RD (V90) was on average > 92%. In No Bolus and MU plans, there was an average reduction of 24.5% and 23.2% V90 coverage respectively in the toes. Spearman's correlation suggests height has the strongest relationship to D1cc.

Conclusion

This study validated the continued use of ankle and foot bolus to achieve dosimetric goals for paediatric MATBI treatments, particularly V90 coverage across all heights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信