分析英国刑法中的精神错乱辩护原则

Ali Ajmal, Faiza Rasool
{"title":"分析英国刑法中的精神错乱辩护原则","authors":"Ali Ajmal, Faiza Rasool","doi":"10.56976/rjsi.v6i1.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A person suffering from legal insanity cannot be held responsible for his criminal act. English criminal law recognizes the doctrine of the insanity defense against the criminal responsibility of an accused. The objective of this paper is to study the English law on insanity defense using the doctrinal legal analysis approach. The findings show that English law deals with legal insanity differently than medical insanity. However, the opinion of the medical professionals is mandatory to determine the legal insanity of a person. Furthermore, the standard of evidence to determine legal insanity is the balance of probabilities. English law treats the insanity defense as distinct from the defense of automatism and diminished capacity and the incompetency to stand trial is also dealt with differently than the defense of insanity in English law. English law on the defense of insanity must be interpreted comprehensively by adopting multidisciplinary approaches.   ","PeriodicalId":498180,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal for Societal Issues","volume":"70 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Doctrine of Insanity Defense in English Criminal Law\",\"authors\":\"Ali Ajmal, Faiza Rasool\",\"doi\":\"10.56976/rjsi.v6i1.181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A person suffering from legal insanity cannot be held responsible for his criminal act. English criminal law recognizes the doctrine of the insanity defense against the criminal responsibility of an accused. The objective of this paper is to study the English law on insanity defense using the doctrinal legal analysis approach. The findings show that English law deals with legal insanity differently than medical insanity. However, the opinion of the medical professionals is mandatory to determine the legal insanity of a person. Furthermore, the standard of evidence to determine legal insanity is the balance of probabilities. English law treats the insanity defense as distinct from the defense of automatism and diminished capacity and the incompetency to stand trial is also dealt with differently than the defense of insanity in English law. English law on the defense of insanity must be interpreted comprehensively by adopting multidisciplinary approaches.   \",\"PeriodicalId\":498180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Journal for Societal Issues\",\"volume\":\"70 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Journal for Societal Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i1.181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal for Societal Issues","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i1.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法律上精神错乱的人不能为其犯罪行为负责。英国刑法承认以精神错乱为由不追究被告刑事责任的辩护理论。本文旨在采用学说法律分析方法研究英国关于精神错乱辩护的法律。研究结果表明,英国法律对法律上的精神错乱与医学上的精神错乱的处理有所不同。然而,在确定一个人是否在法律上精神错乱时,医学专业人员的意见是强制性的。此外,确定法律上精神错乱的证据标准是可能性的权衡。英国法律将精神错乱的辩护与自动症和行为能力减弱的辩护区别对待,英国法律对无能力出庭受审的处理也与精神错乱的辩护不同。关于精神错乱辩护的英国法律必须采用多学科方法进行综合解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Doctrine of Insanity Defense in English Criminal Law
A person suffering from legal insanity cannot be held responsible for his criminal act. English criminal law recognizes the doctrine of the insanity defense against the criminal responsibility of an accused. The objective of this paper is to study the English law on insanity defense using the doctrinal legal analysis approach. The findings show that English law deals with legal insanity differently than medical insanity. However, the opinion of the medical professionals is mandatory to determine the legal insanity of a person. Furthermore, the standard of evidence to determine legal insanity is the balance of probabilities. English law treats the insanity defense as distinct from the defense of automatism and diminished capacity and the incompetency to stand trial is also dealt with differently than the defense of insanity in English law. English law on the defense of insanity must be interpreted comprehensively by adopting multidisciplinary approaches.   
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信