杨木和辐射松经硅酸钠和氢氧化钠处理后的收缩率

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Holzforschung Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1515/hf-2023-0097
Thi Tham Nguyen, Cong Chi Tran, Thi Vinh Khanh Nguyen, Trong Kien Nguyen, Zefang Xiao, Yanjun Xie
{"title":"杨木和辐射松经硅酸钠和氢氧化钠处理后的收缩率","authors":"Thi Tham Nguyen, Cong Chi Tran, Thi Vinh Khanh Nguyen, Trong Kien Nguyen, Zefang Xiao, Yanjun Xie","doi":"10.1515/hf-2023-0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemical modification is an efficient strategy for improving wood quality; however, for some fast-grown wood species unwanted shrinkage occur upon treatment with alkaline solution. This study was devised to reveal the shrinkage behavior of poplar and radiata pine woods treated with 5, 10, 15 and 20 % alkaline sodium silicate (SS) solutions. Wood treated with sodium hydroxide (SH) solution adjusting to the same pH as the specific SS solution was used as a reference sample. The weight loss, chemical components analysis, and confocal microscopy revealed that treatments with SS caused considerable reductions in hemicellulose and acid-insoluble lignin (AIL) of poplar wood up to 51 % and 21 %, respectively. In contrast, such reductions of the SS-treated radiata pine wood were only 13 % and 2 %, respectively. Consequently, shrinkage of poplar wood in the tangential- and radial-directions reached up to 22 % and 11 % respectively. However, such shrinkage for radiata pine was less than 2 % in either direction. The crystallinity index of poplar and radiata pine woods after treatment increased up to 35.3 % and 4.8 %, respectively, attributable to removal of the amorphous fraction. The scanning electron microscopy displayed that treatments had minor effect on the cell structure of radiata pine, but brought about significant collapse of poplar cells. The above results show that radiata pine is more chemically stable to alkaline treatment than poplar.","PeriodicalId":13083,"journal":{"name":"Holzforschung","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shrinkage of poplar and radiata pine wood after treatment with sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide\",\"authors\":\"Thi Tham Nguyen, Cong Chi Tran, Thi Vinh Khanh Nguyen, Trong Kien Nguyen, Zefang Xiao, Yanjun Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/hf-2023-0097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chemical modification is an efficient strategy for improving wood quality; however, for some fast-grown wood species unwanted shrinkage occur upon treatment with alkaline solution. This study was devised to reveal the shrinkage behavior of poplar and radiata pine woods treated with 5, 10, 15 and 20 % alkaline sodium silicate (SS) solutions. Wood treated with sodium hydroxide (SH) solution adjusting to the same pH as the specific SS solution was used as a reference sample. The weight loss, chemical components analysis, and confocal microscopy revealed that treatments with SS caused considerable reductions in hemicellulose and acid-insoluble lignin (AIL) of poplar wood up to 51 % and 21 %, respectively. In contrast, such reductions of the SS-treated radiata pine wood were only 13 % and 2 %, respectively. Consequently, shrinkage of poplar wood in the tangential- and radial-directions reached up to 22 % and 11 % respectively. However, such shrinkage for radiata pine was less than 2 % in either direction. The crystallinity index of poplar and radiata pine woods after treatment increased up to 35.3 % and 4.8 %, respectively, attributable to removal of the amorphous fraction. The scanning electron microscopy displayed that treatments had minor effect on the cell structure of radiata pine, but brought about significant collapse of poplar cells. The above results show that radiata pine is more chemically stable to alkaline treatment than poplar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Holzforschung\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Holzforschung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2023-0097\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Holzforschung","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2023-0097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化学改性是提高木材质量的一种有效策略;然而,对于某些生长迅速的木材品种来说,用碱性溶液处理后会产生不必要的收缩。本研究旨在揭示用 5%、10%、15% 和 20% 的碱性硅酸钠 (SS) 溶液处理的杨木和辐射松木材的收缩行为。用氢氧化钠(SH)溶液处理过的木材的 pH 值与特定 SS 溶液的 pH 值相同,作为参考样本。失重、化学成分分析和共聚焦显微镜检查结果表明,用 SS 处理会导致杨木的半纤维素和酸不溶性木质素(AIL)大量减少,分别高达 51% 和 21%。相比之下,经 SS 处理的辐射松木的半纤维素和酸不溶性木质素(AIL)分别仅减少了 13% 和 2%。因此,杨木在切向和径向的收缩率分别高达 22% 和 11%。然而,辐射松在任何方向上的收缩率都小于 2%。处理后杨木和辐射松木的结晶度指数分别增加到 35.3 % 和 4.8 %,这归因于无定形部分的去除。扫描电子显微镜显示,处理对辐射松的细胞结构影响较小,但会导致杨树细胞明显塌陷。上述结果表明,辐射松对碱性处理的化学稳定性高于杨树。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shrinkage of poplar and radiata pine wood after treatment with sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide
Chemical modification is an efficient strategy for improving wood quality; however, for some fast-grown wood species unwanted shrinkage occur upon treatment with alkaline solution. This study was devised to reveal the shrinkage behavior of poplar and radiata pine woods treated with 5, 10, 15 and 20 % alkaline sodium silicate (SS) solutions. Wood treated with sodium hydroxide (SH) solution adjusting to the same pH as the specific SS solution was used as a reference sample. The weight loss, chemical components analysis, and confocal microscopy revealed that treatments with SS caused considerable reductions in hemicellulose and acid-insoluble lignin (AIL) of poplar wood up to 51 % and 21 %, respectively. In contrast, such reductions of the SS-treated radiata pine wood were only 13 % and 2 %, respectively. Consequently, shrinkage of poplar wood in the tangential- and radial-directions reached up to 22 % and 11 % respectively. However, such shrinkage for radiata pine was less than 2 % in either direction. The crystallinity index of poplar and radiata pine woods after treatment increased up to 35.3 % and 4.8 %, respectively, attributable to removal of the amorphous fraction. The scanning electron microscopy displayed that treatments had minor effect on the cell structure of radiata pine, but brought about significant collapse of poplar cells. The above results show that radiata pine is more chemically stable to alkaline treatment than poplar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Holzforschung
Holzforschung 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Holzforschung is an international scholarly journal that publishes cutting-edge research on the biology, chemistry, physics and technology of wood and wood components. High quality papers about biotechnology and tree genetics are also welcome. Rated year after year as one of the top scientific journals in the category of Pulp and Paper (ISI Journal Citation Index), Holzforschung represents innovative, high quality basic and applied research. The German title reflects the journal''s origins in a long scientific tradition, but all articles are published in English to stimulate and promote cooperation between experts all over the world. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信