多少个运动单位才足够?评估运动单元数量对点火率计算的影响

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Michael J. Marsala , David A. Gabriel , J. Greig Inglis , Anita D. Christie
{"title":"多少个运动单位才足够?评估运动单元数量对点火率计算的影响","authors":"Michael J. Marsala ,&nbsp;David A. Gabriel ,&nbsp;J. Greig Inglis ,&nbsp;Anita D. Christie","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The number of motor units included in calculations of mean firing rates varies widely in the literature. It is unknown how the number of decomposed motor units included in the calculation of firing rate per participant compares to the total number of active motor units in the muscle, and if this is different for males and females. Bootstrapped distributions and confidence intervals (CI) of mean motor unit firing rates decomposed from the tibialis anterior were used to represent the total number of active motor units for individual participants in trials from 20 to 100 % of maximal voluntary contraction. Bootstrapped distributions of mean firing rates were constructed using different numbers of motor units, from one to the maximum number for each participant, and compared to the CIs. A probability measure for each number of motor units involved in firing rate was calculated and then averaged across all individuals. Motor unit numbers required for similar levels of probability increased as contraction intensity increased (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Increased levels of probability also required higher numbers of motor units (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). There was no effect of sex (<em>p</em> ≥ 0.97) for any comparison. This methodology should be repeated in other muscles, and aged populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102872"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How many motor units is enough? An assessment of the influence of the number of motor units on firing rate calculations\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Marsala ,&nbsp;David A. Gabriel ,&nbsp;J. Greig Inglis ,&nbsp;Anita D. Christie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The number of motor units included in calculations of mean firing rates varies widely in the literature. It is unknown how the number of decomposed motor units included in the calculation of firing rate per participant compares to the total number of active motor units in the muscle, and if this is different for males and females. Bootstrapped distributions and confidence intervals (CI) of mean motor unit firing rates decomposed from the tibialis anterior were used to represent the total number of active motor units for individual participants in trials from 20 to 100 % of maximal voluntary contraction. Bootstrapped distributions of mean firing rates were constructed using different numbers of motor units, from one to the maximum number for each participant, and compared to the CIs. A probability measure for each number of motor units involved in firing rate was calculated and then averaged across all individuals. Motor unit numbers required for similar levels of probability increased as contraction intensity increased (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Increased levels of probability also required higher numbers of motor units (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). There was no effect of sex (<em>p</em> ≥ 0.97) for any comparison. This methodology should be repeated in other muscles, and aged populations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102872\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641124000166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641124000166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在文献中,计算平均发射率时所包含的运动单位数量差异很大。目前还不清楚在计算每位参与者的发射率时所包含的分解运动单位数量与肌肉中活跃运动单位总数的比较情况,以及男性和女性的情况是否不同。胫骨前肌分解出的平均运动单位发射率的引导分布和置信区间(CI)被用来表示在最大自主收缩20%到100%的试验中每个参与者的活动运动单位总数。使用不同数量的运动单位(每个参与者从一个到最大数量)构建平均发射率的 Bootstrapped 分布,并与 CIs 进行比较。计算出参与发射率的每个运动单位数量的概率度量,然后求出所有个体的平均值。随着收缩强度的增加,类似概率水平所需的运动单位数量也在增加(p < 0.001)。概率水平的增加也需要更多的运动单位(p <0.001)。在任何比较中,性别都没有影响(p ≥ 0.97)。这种方法应在其他肌肉和老年人群中重复使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How many motor units is enough? An assessment of the influence of the number of motor units on firing rate calculations

The number of motor units included in calculations of mean firing rates varies widely in the literature. It is unknown how the number of decomposed motor units included in the calculation of firing rate per participant compares to the total number of active motor units in the muscle, and if this is different for males and females. Bootstrapped distributions and confidence intervals (CI) of mean motor unit firing rates decomposed from the tibialis anterior were used to represent the total number of active motor units for individual participants in trials from 20 to 100 % of maximal voluntary contraction. Bootstrapped distributions of mean firing rates were constructed using different numbers of motor units, from one to the maximum number for each participant, and compared to the CIs. A probability measure for each number of motor units involved in firing rate was calculated and then averaged across all individuals. Motor unit numbers required for similar levels of probability increased as contraction intensity increased (p < 0.001). Increased levels of probability also required higher numbers of motor units (p < 0.001). There was no effect of sex (p ≥ 0.97) for any comparison. This methodology should be repeated in other muscles, and aged populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信