克里格尔与蒂蒙斯关于康德尊重人的现象学。批判

IF 0.9 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

KANT-STUDIEN Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1515/kant-2024-2002

Dieter Schönecker

{"title":"克里格尔与蒂蒙斯关于康德尊重人的现象学。批判","authors":"Dieter Schönecker","doi":"10.1515/kant-2024-2002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, Uriah Kriegel and Mark Timmons have suggested a “phenomenology of Kantian Respect for Persons”. They offer a reconstruction of Kant’s own account of the phenomenology of respect for persons as well as a refinement of their own. I shall argue that at least with regard to their reconstruction of Kant’s account, they do not succeed. There are a number of shortcomings, the most grievous of which is that Kant does offer a detailed phenomenology of respect in his second Critique which Kriegel and Timmons, however, pay no attention to.","PeriodicalId":45952,"journal":{"name":"KANT-STUDIEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kriegel and Timmons on the Phenomenology of Kantian Respect for Persons. A Critique\",\"authors\":\"Dieter Schönecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/kant-2024-2002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, Uriah Kriegel and Mark Timmons have suggested a “phenomenology of Kantian Respect for Persons”. They offer a reconstruction of Kant’s own account of the phenomenology of respect for persons as well as a refinement of their own. I shall argue that at least with regard to their reconstruction of Kant’s account, they do not succeed. There are a number of shortcomings, the most grievous of which is that Kant does offer a detailed phenomenology of respect in his second Critique which Kriegel and Timmons, however, pay no attention to.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KANT-STUDIEN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KANT-STUDIEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2024-2002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KANT-STUDIEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2024-2002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

最近，Uriah Kriegel 和 Mark Timmons 提出了一种 "康德尊重人的现象学"。他们对康德本人关于尊重人的现象学的论述进行了重建，并对自己的论述进行了完善。我将论证，至少在重建康德的论述方面，他们并没有成功。康德有许多不足之处，其中最严重的是，康德在其第二篇《批判》中确实提出了详细的尊重现象学，但克里格尔和蒂蒙斯却没有注意到这一点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Kriegel and Timmons on the Phenomenology of Kantian Respect for Persons. A Critique

Recently, Uriah Kriegel and Mark Timmons have suggested a “phenomenology of Kantian Respect for Persons”. They offer a reconstruction of Kant’s own account of the phenomenology of respect for persons as well as a refinement of their own. I shall argue that at least with regard to their reconstruction of Kant’s account, they do not succeed. There are a number of shortcomings, the most grievous of which is that Kant does offer a detailed phenomenology of respect in his second Critique which Kriegel and Timmons, however, pay no attention to.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

KANT-STUDIEN PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Publications in the Kant-Studien have a dual focus: firstly contributions to the interpretation, history and editorial questions of Kant"s philosophy, and secondly systematic debates on transcendental philosophy. In addition, there are investigations on Kant"s precursors and on the effects of his philosophy. The journal also contains a documentation section, in which the current state of research is indicated by means of a continually updated bibliography with reviews and references.