科学理论化中的认知妥协是信息科学中认知主义的一个方面(认知妥协理论)

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
V. A. Zhebit
{"title":"科学理论化中的认知妥协是信息科学中认知主义的一个方面(认知妥协理论)","authors":"V. A. Zhebit","doi":"10.3103/s0147688223040172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract—</h3><p>The proposed concept of cognitive compromises, which was developed by the author, is among the basic constructs on which the new scientific direction of cognitive informatics. The author introduces the concept of the scientific paradoxicality, considering it to be a factor inherent in any scientific construction that is at the same time a condition for their further development. The author formulates the principle of the incompleteness of laws, which generates the need to follow the path of inevitable cognitive compromises that allow one to avoid stagnation and ideological uncertainty in scientific research. As examples of the proposed new method of analysis, mental models are presented that use the cognitive aspect of the Observer.</p>","PeriodicalId":43962,"journal":{"name":"Scientific and Technical Information Processing","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Compromises in Scientific Theorizing as an Aspect of Cognitivism in Information Science (Cognitive Compromises Theory)\",\"authors\":\"V. A. Zhebit\",\"doi\":\"10.3103/s0147688223040172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract—</h3><p>The proposed concept of cognitive compromises, which was developed by the author, is among the basic constructs on which the new scientific direction of cognitive informatics. The author introduces the concept of the scientific paradoxicality, considering it to be a factor inherent in any scientific construction that is at the same time a condition for their further development. The author formulates the principle of the incompleteness of laws, which generates the need to follow the path of inevitable cognitive compromises that allow one to avoid stagnation and ideological uncertainty in scientific research. As examples of the proposed new method of analysis, mental models are presented that use the cognitive aspect of the Observer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific and Technical Information Processing\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific and Technical Information Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3103/s0147688223040172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific and Technical Information Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3103/s0147688223040172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 作者提出的 "认知折衷 "概念是认知信息学新科学方向的基本构架之一。作者提出了科学悖论的概念,认为它是任何科学建构所固有的因素,同时也是其进一步发展的条件。作者提出了 "规律的不完整性 "原则,认为有必要遵循不可避免的认知妥协之路,以避免科学研究的停滞和意识形态的不确定性。作为所提议的新分析方法的实例,介绍了使用观察者认知方面的心智模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Compromises in Scientific Theorizing as an Aspect of Cognitivism in Information Science (Cognitive Compromises Theory)

Abstract—

The proposed concept of cognitive compromises, which was developed by the author, is among the basic constructs on which the new scientific direction of cognitive informatics. The author introduces the concept of the scientific paradoxicality, considering it to be a factor inherent in any scientific construction that is at the same time a condition for their further development. The author formulates the principle of the incompleteness of laws, which generates the need to follow the path of inevitable cognitive compromises that allow one to avoid stagnation and ideological uncertainty in scientific research. As examples of the proposed new method of analysis, mental models are presented that use the cognitive aspect of the Observer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific and Technical Information Processing
Scientific and Technical Information Processing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
42.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Scientific and Technical Information Processing  is a refereed journal that covers all aspects of management and use of information technology in libraries and archives, information centres, and the information industry in general. Emphasis is on practical applications of new technologies and techniques for information analysis and processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信