对于种族和民族群体而言,传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划在护理质量方面的差距并不一致。

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jeah Jung, Hansoo Ko, Roger Feldman, Caroline S Carlin, Ge Song
{"title":"对于种族和民族群体而言,传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划在护理质量方面的差距并不一致。","authors":"Jeah Jung, Hansoo Ko, Roger Feldman, Caroline S Carlin, Ge Song","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quality of care experienced by members of racial and ethnic minority groups in Medicare Advantage, which is an increasingly important source of Medicare coverage for these groups, has critical implications for health equity. Comparing gaps in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare for three quality-of-care outcomes, measured by adverse health events, between minority and non-Hispanic White populations, we found that the relative magnitude of the gaps varied both by racial and ethnic minority group and by quality measure. Hispanic versus non-Hispanic White gaps were smaller in Medicare Advantage than in traditional Medicare for all outcomes: avoidable emergency department use, preventable hospitalizations, and thirty-day hospital readmissions. The gap between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations was larger in Medicare Advantage than in traditional Medicare for avoidable emergency department use but was no different for hospital readmissions and was smaller for preventable hospitalizations. The Asian versus non-Hispanic White gap was similar in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare for avoidable emergency department use and preventable hospitalizations but was larger in Medicare Advantage for hospital readmissions. As Medicare Advantage enrollment expands, monitoring the quality of care for enrollees who are members of racial and ethnic minority groups will remain important.</p>","PeriodicalId":50411,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs","volume":"43 3","pages":"381-390"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaps In Quality Of Care Not Consistent Between Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage For Racial And Ethnic Groups.\",\"authors\":\"Jeah Jung, Hansoo Ko, Roger Feldman, Caroline S Carlin, Ge Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The quality of care experienced by members of racial and ethnic minority groups in Medicare Advantage, which is an increasingly important source of Medicare coverage for these groups, has critical implications for health equity. Comparing gaps in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare for three quality-of-care outcomes, measured by adverse health events, between minority and non-Hispanic White populations, we found that the relative magnitude of the gaps varied both by racial and ethnic minority group and by quality measure. Hispanic versus non-Hispanic White gaps were smaller in Medicare Advantage than in traditional Medicare for all outcomes: avoidable emergency department use, preventable hospitalizations, and thirty-day hospital readmissions. The gap between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations was larger in Medicare Advantage than in traditional Medicare for avoidable emergency department use but was no different for hospital readmissions and was smaller for preventable hospitalizations. The Asian versus non-Hispanic White gap was similar in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare for avoidable emergency department use and preventable hospitalizations but was larger in Medicare Advantage for hospital readmissions. As Medicare Advantage enrollment expands, monitoring the quality of care for enrollees who are members of racial and ethnic minority groups will remain important.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Affairs\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"381-390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00428\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保险优势计划(Medicare Advantage)是少数种族和少数族裔群体日益重要的医疗保险来源,该计划对这些群体的医疗质量有着至关重要的影响。我们比较了少数族裔和非西班牙裔白人在医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险中以不良健康事件为衡量标准的三种医疗质量结果的差距,发现差距的相对大小因少数族裔群体和质量衡量标准而异。在可避免的急诊使用、可预防的住院治疗和三十天再入院治疗等所有结果方面,医疗保险优势计划中西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人之间的差距均小于传统医疗保险。就可避免的急诊使用而言,非西班牙裔黑人与非西班牙裔白人在 "医疗保险优势计划 "中的差距大于传统 "医疗保险 "中的差距,但就可避免的住院治疗而言,非西班牙裔黑人与非西班牙裔白人在 "医疗保险优势计划 "中的差距没有差别,但就可避免的住院治疗而言,非西班牙裔黑人与非西班牙裔白人的差距较小。在可避免的急诊使用和可预防的住院方面,"医疗保险优势计划 "和传统 "医疗保险 "中亚裔与非西班牙裔白人的差距相似,但在再入院方面,"医疗保险优势计划 "中亚裔与非西班牙裔白人的差距更大。随着 "联邦医疗保险优势计划 "参保人数的增加,对少数种族和少数族裔参保者的医疗质量进行监控仍将十分重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gaps In Quality Of Care Not Consistent Between Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage For Racial And Ethnic Groups.

The quality of care experienced by members of racial and ethnic minority groups in Medicare Advantage, which is an increasingly important source of Medicare coverage for these groups, has critical implications for health equity. Comparing gaps in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare for three quality-of-care outcomes, measured by adverse health events, between minority and non-Hispanic White populations, we found that the relative magnitude of the gaps varied both by racial and ethnic minority group and by quality measure. Hispanic versus non-Hispanic White gaps were smaller in Medicare Advantage than in traditional Medicare for all outcomes: avoidable emergency department use, preventable hospitalizations, and thirty-day hospital readmissions. The gap between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations was larger in Medicare Advantage than in traditional Medicare for avoidable emergency department use but was no different for hospital readmissions and was smaller for preventable hospitalizations. The Asian versus non-Hispanic White gap was similar in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare for avoidable emergency department use and preventable hospitalizations but was larger in Medicare Advantage for hospital readmissions. As Medicare Advantage enrollment expands, monitoring the quality of care for enrollees who are members of racial and ethnic minority groups will remain important.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Affairs
Health Affairs 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Affairs is a prestigious journal that aims to thoroughly examine significant health policy matters both domestically and globally. Our publication is committed to addressing issues that are relevant to both the private and public sectors. We are enthusiastic about inviting private and public decision-makers to contribute their innovative ideas in a publishable format. Health Affairs seeks to incorporate various perspectives from industry, labor, government, and academia, ensuring that our readers benefit from the diverse viewpoints within the healthcare field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信