构建论点：俄乌战争中的种族灭绝标签案例

IF 1 2区文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Argumentation Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1007/s10503-024-09632-1

Elena Musi

{"title":"构建论点：俄乌战争中的种族灭绝标签案例","authors":"Elena Musi","doi":"10.1007/s10503-024-09632-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study tackles hashtags as framing devices which shape public arguments and controversies in computer-mediated communication environments. It focuses on the use of the <i>genocide</i> hashtag on Twitter in the context of the Ukraine-Russia war. It proposes and showcases a methodology to surface how the semantic and discourse properties of the term genocide affect its framing properties as a hashtag which bears argumentative functions, directly or indirectly calling for action.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"38 3","pages":"269 - 288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-024-09632-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing to Make an Argument: The Case of the Genocide Hashtag in the Russia-Ukraine war\",\"authors\":\"Elena Musi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10503-024-09632-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study tackles hashtags as framing devices which shape public arguments and controversies in computer-mediated communication environments. It focuses on the use of the <i>genocide</i> hashtag on Twitter in the context of the Ukraine-Russia war. It proposes and showcases a methodology to surface how the semantic and discourse properties of the term genocide affect its framing properties as a hashtag which bears argumentative functions, directly or indirectly calling for action.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argumentation\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"269 - 288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-024-09632-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argumentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10503-024-09632-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumentation","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10503-024-09632-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在以计算机为媒介的传播环境中，标签作为塑造公共论点和争议的框架工具。研究重点关注乌克兰-俄罗斯战争背景下 Twitter 上种族灭绝标签的使用。它提出并展示了一种方法论，以揭示种族灭绝一词的语义和话语特性如何影响其作为具有论证功能的标签的框架特性，直接或间接地呼吁采取行动。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Framing to Make an Argument: The Case of the Genocide Hashtag in the Russia-Ukraine war

查看原文本刊更多论文

Framing to Make an Argument: The Case of the Genocide Hashtag in the Russia-Ukraine war

This study tackles hashtags as framing devices which shape public arguments and controversies in computer-mediated communication environments. It focuses on the use of the genocide hashtag on Twitter in the context of the Ukraine-Russia war. It proposes and showcases a methodology to surface how the semantic and discourse properties of the term genocide affect its framing properties as a hashtag which bears argumentative functions, directly or indirectly calling for action.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Argumentation Multiple-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Argumentation is an international and interdisciplinary journal. Its aim is to gather academic contributions from a wide range of scholarly backgrounds and approaches to reasoning, natural inference and persuasion: communication, rhetoric (classical and modern), linguistics, discourse analysis, pragmatics, psychology, philosophy, logic (formal and informal), critical thinking, history and law. Its scope includes a diversity of interests, varying from philosophical, theoretical and analytical to empirical and practical topics. Argumentation publishes papers, book reviews, a yearly bibliography, and announcements of conferences and seminars.To be considered for publication in the journal, a paper must satisfy all of these criteria:1. Report research that is within the journals’ scope: concentrating on argumentation 2. Pose a clear and relevant research question 3. Make a contribution to the literature that connects with the state of the art in the field of argumentation theory 4. Be sound in methodology and analysis 5. Provide appropriate evidence and argumentation for the conclusions 6. Be presented in a clear and intelligible fashion in standard English