反思版税:音乐流媒体平台的替代支付系统

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"反思版税:音乐流媒体平台的替代支付系统","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10824-024-09507-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Music streaming changed the recorded music industry’s business model from individual product sales to unlimited on-demand access subscriptions. The streaming platforms experienced strong growth during the 2010s and now drive most of the industry’s revenue, up to 90% in the most mature markets. Until recently, the payment system for rights holders had remained unchanged. Many industry stakeholders criticise the system’s alleged unfairness, and artist organisations, independent labels and major labels all propose different ideas to ‘fix’ the music streaming payment system. The current ‘pro-rata’ payment system pools all subscription fees, with each rights holder receiving a payment proportional to their share of the accumulated number of streams. The system does not look to align the individual users’ payments with their actual musical preferences and consumption. Therefore, this paper defines the problem of the current music streaming payment system as its allocation of equal value on all streams. The paper proposes a framework to systematically evaluate alternative payment systems inspired by policy analysis and planning. It additionally contributes with a structured evaluation of six alternative payment systems that rethinks how streams are calculated and remunerated to restore the price discrimination between different listening behaviours. The paper finds that developing a mixture of the alternative systems can likely solve many of the current system’s challenges. Furthermore, the paper analyses and discusses the new payment system changes to be implemented on Deezer and Spotify.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking royalties: alternative payment systems on music streaming platforms\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10824-024-09507-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Music streaming changed the recorded music industry’s business model from individual product sales to unlimited on-demand access subscriptions. The streaming platforms experienced strong growth during the 2010s and now drive most of the industry’s revenue, up to 90% in the most mature markets. Until recently, the payment system for rights holders had remained unchanged. Many industry stakeholders criticise the system’s alleged unfairness, and artist organisations, independent labels and major labels all propose different ideas to ‘fix’ the music streaming payment system. The current ‘pro-rata’ payment system pools all subscription fees, with each rights holder receiving a payment proportional to their share of the accumulated number of streams. The system does not look to align the individual users’ payments with their actual musical preferences and consumption. Therefore, this paper defines the problem of the current music streaming payment system as its allocation of equal value on all streams. The paper proposes a framework to systematically evaluate alternative payment systems inspired by policy analysis and planning. It additionally contributes with a structured evaluation of six alternative payment systems that rethinks how streams are calculated and remunerated to restore the price discrimination between different listening behaviours. The paper finds that developing a mixture of the alternative systems can likely solve many of the current system’s challenges. Furthermore, the paper analyses and discusses the new payment system changes to be implemented on Deezer and Spotify.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-024-09507-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-024-09507-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 音乐流媒体改变了录制音乐行业的商业模式,从单个产品销售转变为无限制的点播订阅。流媒体平台在 2010 年代经历了强劲的增长,目前驱动着整个行业的大部分收入,在最成熟的市场中,这一比例高达 90%。直到最近,版权持有者的付费系统仍未改变。许多行业利益相关者批评该系统涉嫌不公平,艺术家组织、独立唱片公司和大唱片公司都提出了不同的想法来 "修复 "音乐流媒体付费系统。目前的 "按比例 "付费系统将所有订阅费用集中在一起,每个权利人按其在累积流媒体数量中所占的份额获得相应的付费。该系统无法使个人用户的付费与其实际音乐偏好和消费保持一致。因此,本文将当前音乐流媒体付费系统的问题定义为对所有流媒体进行等值分配。受政策分析和规划的启发,本文提出了一个系统评估替代付费系统的框架。此外,它还对六种替代付费系统进行了结构化评估,重新思考了如何计算和补偿流媒体,以恢复不同收听行为之间的价格歧视。论文发现,开发替代系统的混合方案有可能解决目前系统面临的许多挑战。此外,本文还分析和讨论了 Deezer 和 Spotify 即将实施的新付费系统变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking royalties: alternative payment systems on music streaming platforms

Abstract

Music streaming changed the recorded music industry’s business model from individual product sales to unlimited on-demand access subscriptions. The streaming platforms experienced strong growth during the 2010s and now drive most of the industry’s revenue, up to 90% in the most mature markets. Until recently, the payment system for rights holders had remained unchanged. Many industry stakeholders criticise the system’s alleged unfairness, and artist organisations, independent labels and major labels all propose different ideas to ‘fix’ the music streaming payment system. The current ‘pro-rata’ payment system pools all subscription fees, with each rights holder receiving a payment proportional to their share of the accumulated number of streams. The system does not look to align the individual users’ payments with their actual musical preferences and consumption. Therefore, this paper defines the problem of the current music streaming payment system as its allocation of equal value on all streams. The paper proposes a framework to systematically evaluate alternative payment systems inspired by policy analysis and planning. It additionally contributes with a structured evaluation of six alternative payment systems that rethinks how streams are calculated and remunerated to restore the price discrimination between different listening behaviours. The paper finds that developing a mixture of the alternative systems can likely solve many of the current system’s challenges. Furthermore, the paper analyses and discusses the new payment system changes to be implemented on Deezer and Spotify.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信