利用公民科学数据绘制 Tetrix subulata 的翅膀形态图：不会飞的地老虎在近水的草地上更常见

IF 3.2 2区农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY

Insect Conservation and Diversity Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1111/icad.12730

Lars G. Willighagen, Eelke Jongejans

引用次数: 0

摘要

纤小地蜢（直翅目：Tetrigidae）Tetrix subulata（林奈，1758 年）与其他几类有翅昆虫一样，有长翅和短翅两种形态，后者不能飞行。T.subulata的最佳栖息地是潮湿的草地和平坦的海岸，因为它们主要在潮湿、阳光充足的开阔地以藻类和苔藓为食。根据不同的假说，短翅或长翅形态在最佳栖息地中相对更普遍。以前的调查在空间范围上受到限制。为了大幅增加研究地点的数量，我们通过全球生物多样性信息基金（GBIF）获得了荷兰公民科学家的地理参照观测数据。我们根据这些观测数据所附的照片确定了个体的翅膀形态，并将翅膀形态模式与大尺度和中尺度景观特征联系起来。我们的分析表明，在主要河流附近的草地上，发现了相对较多的短翅个体。在由针叶林和高沙区石楠组成的较干燥地貌中，观察到较多的长翅个体。建筑密集区对翅膀长度没有明显影响。这些模式可能是由卵生-飞行综合征或小规模空间分选造成的，但确切的机制尚不清楚，因为体型依赖性也可能起作用。虽然机会性观察会因观察者喜欢去的地点和时间以及不同物种组之间的报告概率不同而产生偏差，但这些偏差不太可能影响我们的结论。公民科学数据似乎适合用于分析物种内形态类型的空间分布和分类。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Mapping wing morphs of Tetrix subulata using citizen science data: Flightless groundhoppers are more prevalent in grasslands near water

查看原文本刊更多论文

Mapping wing morphs of Tetrix subulata using citizen science data: Flightless groundhoppers are more prevalent in grasslands near water

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Insect Conservation and Diversity 生物-昆虫学

CiteScore

7.70

自引率

8.60%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： To publish papers of the highest scientific quality within the general area of insect (and other arthropods) conservation and diversity covering topics ranging from ecological theory to practical management. Papers are invited on the following topics: Conservation genetics; Extinction debt; Long-term conservation planning and implementation; Global implications of local or national conservation actions; Management responses of species and communities; Captive breeding programs; Comparisons of restored and natural habitats; Biogeography; Global biodiversity; Metapopulation dynamics; Climate change: impacts on distributions and range; Invasive species: impacts and control; Effects of pollution; Genetic threats to diversity by introgression; Effects of fragmentation on diversity and distribution; Impact of agricultural and forestry practices on biodiversity; Enhancing urban environments for diversity and protection; Biodiversity action plans: can we scale up from insects?; Effectiveness and choice of indicator species; Soil biodiversity and interactions with above-ground biodiversity; Ecological interactions at local levels; Ecological and evolutionary factors influencing diversity and local, regional and global scales; Sustainable livelihoods and training on the ground; Integrating science and policy.