面向驾驶体验的汽车座椅舒适性设计与评价方法研究

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Mingyue Li , Biao Li , Guoying Chen , Hong Li , Baohua Ding , Chongyue Shi , Fei Yu
{"title":"面向驾驶体验的汽车座椅舒适性设计与评价方法研究","authors":"Mingyue Li ,&nbsp;Biao Li ,&nbsp;Guoying Chen ,&nbsp;Hong Li ,&nbsp;Baohua Ding ,&nbsp;Chongyue Shi ,&nbsp;Fei Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the effects of different driving durations on the distribution of seat interface pressure and the perceived comfort of vehicle occupants. The comfort of vehicle occupants was assessed using the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) scoring table, while pressure mats were employed to analyze pressure distribution during driving. The subjective and objective data underwent statistical analysis through repeated measures one-way ANOVA and Tukey's Honestly Significantly Different (HSD) test. Additionally, the mapping relationship between pressure variables and subjective comfort was investigated. The results indicated that the duration of driving had a significant impact on upper back contact pressure, left buttock contact force, lower back contact force, upper back contact area, and lower back contact area. The majority of pressure variables exhibited significant correlations with overall comfort, particularly in the area of lower back contact. Practical measures for enhancing long-term driving comfort were suggested based on the results of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the linear model. In addition, the developed nonlinear model successfully captures the driver's comprehensive comfort ratings, with an R2 value of 0.605. Our study revealed the patterns of subjective comfort and objective pressure distribution during the driving process, providing a reliable approach for evaluating seat comfort. Automotive seat development companies and designers can utilize these findings to enhance seat design and maintain comfort during prolonged periods of sitting. In summary, this study contributes to the development of the automotive seat comfort design industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the design and evaluation method of vehicle seat comfort for driving experience\",\"authors\":\"Mingyue Li ,&nbsp;Biao Li ,&nbsp;Guoying Chen ,&nbsp;Hong Li ,&nbsp;Baohua Ding ,&nbsp;Chongyue Shi ,&nbsp;Fei Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigated the effects of different driving durations on the distribution of seat interface pressure and the perceived comfort of vehicle occupants. The comfort of vehicle occupants was assessed using the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) scoring table, while pressure mats were employed to analyze pressure distribution during driving. The subjective and objective data underwent statistical analysis through repeated measures one-way ANOVA and Tukey's Honestly Significantly Different (HSD) test. Additionally, the mapping relationship between pressure variables and subjective comfort was investigated. The results indicated that the duration of driving had a significant impact on upper back contact pressure, left buttock contact force, lower back contact force, upper back contact area, and lower back contact area. The majority of pressure variables exhibited significant correlations with overall comfort, particularly in the area of lower back contact. Practical measures for enhancing long-term driving comfort were suggested based on the results of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the linear model. In addition, the developed nonlinear model successfully captures the driver's comprehensive comfort ratings, with an R2 value of 0.605. Our study revealed the patterns of subjective comfort and objective pressure distribution during the driving process, providing a reliable approach for evaluating seat comfort. Automotive seat development companies and designers can utilize these findings to enhance seat design and maintain comfort during prolonged periods of sitting. In summary, this study contributes to the development of the automotive seat comfort design industry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000234\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了不同驾驶持续时间对座椅界面压力分布和车内人员舒适感的影响。研究人员使用美国汽车工程师学会(SAE)的评分表对乘员的舒适度进行了评估,并使用压力垫分析了驾驶过程中的压力分布。通过重复测量单因素方差分析和 Tukey's 诚实显著性差异(HSD)检验,对主观和客观数据进行了统计分析。此外,还研究了压力变量与主观舒适度之间的映射关系。结果表明,驾驶时间对上背部接触压力、左臀部接触力、下背部接触力、上背部接触面积和下背部接触面积有显著影响。大多数压力变量与整体舒适度有明显的相关性,尤其是在下背部接触方面。根据主成分分析(PCA)和线性模型的结果,提出了提高长期驾驶舒适性的实用措施。此外,所开发的非线性模型成功捕捉到了驾驶员的综合舒适度评分,其 R2 值为 0.605。我们的研究揭示了驾驶过程中主观舒适度和客观压力分布的规律,为评估座椅舒适度提供了一种可靠的方法。汽车座椅开发公司和设计师可以利用这些发现来改进座椅设计,并在长时间乘坐时保持舒适性。总之,本研究有助于汽车座椅舒适性设计行业的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on the design and evaluation method of vehicle seat comfort for driving experience

This study investigated the effects of different driving durations on the distribution of seat interface pressure and the perceived comfort of vehicle occupants. The comfort of vehicle occupants was assessed using the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) scoring table, while pressure mats were employed to analyze pressure distribution during driving. The subjective and objective data underwent statistical analysis through repeated measures one-way ANOVA and Tukey's Honestly Significantly Different (HSD) test. Additionally, the mapping relationship between pressure variables and subjective comfort was investigated. The results indicated that the duration of driving had a significant impact on upper back contact pressure, left buttock contact force, lower back contact force, upper back contact area, and lower back contact area. The majority of pressure variables exhibited significant correlations with overall comfort, particularly in the area of lower back contact. Practical measures for enhancing long-term driving comfort were suggested based on the results of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the linear model. In addition, the developed nonlinear model successfully captures the driver's comprehensive comfort ratings, with an R2 value of 0.605. Our study revealed the patterns of subjective comfort and objective pressure distribution during the driving process, providing a reliable approach for evaluating seat comfort. Automotive seat development companies and designers can utilize these findings to enhance seat design and maintain comfort during prolonged periods of sitting. In summary, this study contributes to the development of the automotive seat comfort design industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信