铥激光与冷钢扁桃体切除术:一项针对成年患者的前瞻性试点研究

Manana K. Baghdasaryan, Gurgen K. Mkhitaryan, Martin S. Misakyan, Vahe V. Vermishyan, Artashes E. Tadevosyan, Aren Yu. Bablumyan, Anna Yu. Poghosyan
{"title":"铥激光与冷钢扁桃体切除术:一项针对成年患者的前瞻性试点研究","authors":"Manana K. Baghdasaryan, Gurgen K. Mkhitaryan, Martin S. Misakyan, Vahe V. Vermishyan, Artashes E. Tadevosyan, Aren Yu. Bablumyan, Anna Yu. Poghosyan","doi":"10.1186/s43163-024-00584-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this pilot study was to compare the operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, and wound healing of the thulium RevoLix laser tonsillectomy method over the more commonly practiced cold steel tonsillectomy. A prospective, single-blinded randomized pilot trial was conducted. Twenty-four adult patients with a mean age of 28.7 years with chronic recurrent tonsillitis were observed and underwent tonsillectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to have one tonsil removed with a thulium RevoLix laser 200, and the conventional cold steel tonsillectomy method was used for the other side. The tonsillectomy time from incision to hemostasis was 12.08 ± 0.77 (SE) min with the laser method and 10.92 ± 1.31(SE) min with the cold dissection method, with no statistically significant difference (P < 0.121). Intraoperative blood loss in the cold dissection method was 10.92 ± 1.31 ml, and 2.04 ± 1.62 ml was observed during laser treatment (P < 0.000, t = 8.363). In the cold steel tonsillectomy group, the pain score was significantly higher than that in the laser tonsillectomy group on the 7th and 12th postoperative days. The use of the thulium RevoLix 200 laser for tonsillectomy in the present pilot study of 24 patients showed significantly better outcomes than those in conventional cold dissection methods in terms of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative pain; however, there was no statistically significant difference in other parameters, such as operational time and late postoperative bleeding. A large full-scale prospective study is needed to increase the generalizability and reliability of the results. ISRCTN16280803, registered on 25 March 2020, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16280803 .","PeriodicalId":501131,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thulium laser versus cold steel tonsillectomy: a prospective pilot study in adult patients\",\"authors\":\"Manana K. Baghdasaryan, Gurgen K. Mkhitaryan, Martin S. Misakyan, Vahe V. Vermishyan, Artashes E. Tadevosyan, Aren Yu. Bablumyan, Anna Yu. Poghosyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43163-024-00584-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this pilot study was to compare the operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, and wound healing of the thulium RevoLix laser tonsillectomy method over the more commonly practiced cold steel tonsillectomy. A prospective, single-blinded randomized pilot trial was conducted. Twenty-four adult patients with a mean age of 28.7 years with chronic recurrent tonsillitis were observed and underwent tonsillectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to have one tonsil removed with a thulium RevoLix laser 200, and the conventional cold steel tonsillectomy method was used for the other side. The tonsillectomy time from incision to hemostasis was 12.08 ± 0.77 (SE) min with the laser method and 10.92 ± 1.31(SE) min with the cold dissection method, with no statistically significant difference (P < 0.121). Intraoperative blood loss in the cold dissection method was 10.92 ± 1.31 ml, and 2.04 ± 1.62 ml was observed during laser treatment (P < 0.000, t = 8.363). In the cold steel tonsillectomy group, the pain score was significantly higher than that in the laser tonsillectomy group on the 7th and 12th postoperative days. The use of the thulium RevoLix 200 laser for tonsillectomy in the present pilot study of 24 patients showed significantly better outcomes than those in conventional cold dissection methods in terms of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative pain; however, there was no statistically significant difference in other parameters, such as operational time and late postoperative bleeding. A large full-scale prospective study is needed to increase the generalizability and reliability of the results. ISRCTN16280803, registered on 25 March 2020, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16280803 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":501131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-024-00584-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-024-00584-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验研究旨在比较铥 RevoLix 激光扁桃体切除术与更常用的冷钢扁桃体切除术的手术时间、术中和术后出血量、术后疼痛和伤口愈合情况。我们进行了一项前瞻性、单盲随机试验。24名平均年龄为28.7岁的慢性复发性扁桃体炎成年患者接受了扁桃体切除术。患者被随机分配使用铥 RevoLix 激光 200 切除一侧扁桃体,另一侧则使用传统的冷钢扁桃体切除法。扁桃体切除术从切口到止血的时间,激光法为 12.08 ± 0.77(SE)分钟,冷剥离法为 10.92 ± 1.31(SE)分钟,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.121)。冷剥离法的术中出血量为(10.92 ± 1.31)毫升,激光治疗的术中出血量为(2.04 ± 1.62)毫升(P < 0.000,t = 8.363)。冷钢扁桃体切除术组在术后第 7 天和第 12 天的疼痛评分明显高于激光扁桃体切除术组。在本项对 24 名患者进行的试点研究中,使用铥 RevoLix 200 激光进行扁桃体切除术在术中出血量和术后疼痛方面的效果明显优于传统的冷剥离法;但在其他参数方面,如手术时间和术后晚期出血量,没有统计学意义上的显著差异。要提高研究结果的普遍性和可靠性,还需要进行大规模的前瞻性研究。ISRCTN16280803,注册于2020年3月25日,https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16280803 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thulium laser versus cold steel tonsillectomy: a prospective pilot study in adult patients
The aim of this pilot study was to compare the operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, and wound healing of the thulium RevoLix laser tonsillectomy method over the more commonly practiced cold steel tonsillectomy. A prospective, single-blinded randomized pilot trial was conducted. Twenty-four adult patients with a mean age of 28.7 years with chronic recurrent tonsillitis were observed and underwent tonsillectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to have one tonsil removed with a thulium RevoLix laser 200, and the conventional cold steel tonsillectomy method was used for the other side. The tonsillectomy time from incision to hemostasis was 12.08 ± 0.77 (SE) min with the laser method and 10.92 ± 1.31(SE) min with the cold dissection method, with no statistically significant difference (P < 0.121). Intraoperative blood loss in the cold dissection method was 10.92 ± 1.31 ml, and 2.04 ± 1.62 ml was observed during laser treatment (P < 0.000, t = 8.363). In the cold steel tonsillectomy group, the pain score was significantly higher than that in the laser tonsillectomy group on the 7th and 12th postoperative days. The use of the thulium RevoLix 200 laser for tonsillectomy in the present pilot study of 24 patients showed significantly better outcomes than those in conventional cold dissection methods in terms of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative pain; however, there was no statistically significant difference in other parameters, such as operational time and late postoperative bleeding. A large full-scale prospective study is needed to increase the generalizability and reliability of the results. ISRCTN16280803, registered on 25 March 2020, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16280803 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信