J. Veilleux Deschênes , C. Sénéchal , S. Larivée , L. Brunet
{"title":"与滥用监督研究相关的测量伪影：对 Mackey 等人（2017 年）分析的再审视","authors":"J. Veilleux Deschênes , C. Sénéchal , S. Larivée , L. Brunet","doi":"10.1016/j.pto.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An abusive leader uses humiliation, belittlement and manipulation to influence employees in achieving work-related goals. A better understanding of the antecedents and mechanisms that promote abusive supervision would help tailor organizational processes in order to reduce its occurrence and negative consequences. However, issues related to the measurement of abusive supervision necessitate attention, such as the multiplicity of tools and variants, and possible differences when measuring the construct across cultures. This systematic review focuses on empirical prepandemic studies published between 2015-2020 that have quantitatively measured Tepper's (2000) abusive supervision, and aims to increase knowledge regarding the targeted measurement issues. The goal is to help researchers and practitioners in choosing and adapting their measuring instrument in order to more effectively capture the construct.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43191,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","volume":"30 1","pages":"Pages 29-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artéfacts de mesure associés à l'étude de la supervision abusive : un second regard aux analyses de Mackey et al. (2017)\",\"authors\":\"J. Veilleux Deschênes , C. Sénéchal , S. Larivée , L. Brunet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pto.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An abusive leader uses humiliation, belittlement and manipulation to influence employees in achieving work-related goals. A better understanding of the antecedents and mechanisms that promote abusive supervision would help tailor organizational processes in order to reduce its occurrence and negative consequences. However, issues related to the measurement of abusive supervision necessitate attention, such as the multiplicity of tools and variants, and possible differences when measuring the construct across cultures. This systematic review focuses on empirical prepandemic studies published between 2015-2020 that have quantitatively measured Tepper's (2000) abusive supervision, and aims to increase knowledge regarding the targeted measurement issues. The goal is to help researchers and practitioners in choosing and adapting their measuring instrument in order to more effectively capture the construct.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 29-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253023001024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253023001024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artéfacts de mesure associés à l'étude de la supervision abusive : un second regard aux analyses de Mackey et al. (2017)
An abusive leader uses humiliation, belittlement and manipulation to influence employees in achieving work-related goals. A better understanding of the antecedents and mechanisms that promote abusive supervision would help tailor organizational processes in order to reduce its occurrence and negative consequences. However, issues related to the measurement of abusive supervision necessitate attention, such as the multiplicity of tools and variants, and possible differences when measuring the construct across cultures. This systematic review focuses on empirical prepandemic studies published between 2015-2020 that have quantitatively measured Tepper's (2000) abusive supervision, and aims to increase knowledge regarding the targeted measurement issues. The goal is to help researchers and practitioners in choosing and adapting their measuring instrument in order to more effectively capture the construct.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
