新西兰单侧唇腭裂儿童的侧裂牙弓关系结果。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Peter V Fowler, H Keall, D Kennedy, D Healey, J M D Thompson
{"title":"新西兰单侧唇腭裂儿童的侧裂牙弓关系结果。","authors":"Peter V Fowler, H Keall, D Kennedy, D Healey, J M D Thompson","doi":"10.1177/10556656241234599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate cleft laterality dental arch relationship outcomes of children with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective nationwide study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Virtual 3D orthodontic study models collected prior to undertaking secondary alveolar bone grafting.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 104 patients with UCLP (L = 80: R = 24).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Four calibrated assessors used the GOSLON Yardstick and 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to score the randomised models on 2 separate assessment sessions. Weighted Kappa were used to determine the intra/inter-rater reliability for the GOSLON and correlations for the VAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.57-0.88 (GOSLON) and 0.45-0.93 (VAS). Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.62-0.86 (GOSLON) and 0.64-0.93 (VAS).GOSLON scores for the left UCLP were 31.2% for good/very good; 26.3% for fair; 42.5% for poor/very poor while the right UCLP scored 8.3% for good/very good; 37.5% for fair; 54.2% for poor/very poor. The mean VAS for left and right UCLP were 53.4 (sd 22.5) and 44.6 (sd 17.1) respectively. Neither the GOSLON nor VAS differences reached statistical significance (both <i>P</i> = .08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From a clinical perspective right UCLP had worse dental arch relationship outcomes, however, these differences failed to reach statistical significance. Further studies using larger sample sizes are required to determine if cleft laterality is an important consideration when investigating UCLP dental arch outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cleft Laterality Dental Arch Relationship Outcomes for Children with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate in New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Peter V Fowler, H Keall, D Kennedy, D Healey, J M D Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241234599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate cleft laterality dental arch relationship outcomes of children with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective nationwide study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Virtual 3D orthodontic study models collected prior to undertaking secondary alveolar bone grafting.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 104 patients with UCLP (L = 80: R = 24).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Four calibrated assessors used the GOSLON Yardstick and 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to score the randomised models on 2 separate assessment sessions. Weighted Kappa were used to determine the intra/inter-rater reliability for the GOSLON and correlations for the VAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.57-0.88 (GOSLON) and 0.45-0.93 (VAS). Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.62-0.86 (GOSLON) and 0.64-0.93 (VAS).GOSLON scores for the left UCLP were 31.2% for good/very good; 26.3% for fair; 42.5% for poor/very poor while the right UCLP scored 8.3% for good/very good; 37.5% for fair; 54.2% for poor/very poor. The mean VAS for left and right UCLP were 53.4 (sd 22.5) and 44.6 (sd 17.1) respectively. Neither the GOSLON nor VAS differences reached statistical significance (both <i>P</i> = .08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From a clinical perspective right UCLP had worse dental arch relationship outcomes, however, these differences failed to reach statistical significance. Further studies using larger sample sizes are required to determine if cleft laterality is an important consideration when investigating UCLP dental arch outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241234599\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241234599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查新西兰非综合征完全性单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)儿童侧裂牙弓关系的结果:调查新西兰非综合征完全性单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患儿侧裂牙弓关系的结果:设计:全国范围内的回顾性研究:设置:在进行二次牙槽骨移植之前收集虚拟三维正畸研究模型:结果测量:四名经过校准的评估员使用 GOSLON 码尺和 100 毫米视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 在两次不同的评估中对随机模型进行评分。采用加权卡帕法确定 GOSLON 的评分者内部/评分者之间的可靠性以及 VAS 的相关性:评分者内部信度为 0.57-0.88(GOSLON),评分者间信度为 0.45-0.93(VAS)。左侧 UCLP 的 GOSLON 得分为 31.2%(好/很好)、26.3%(一般)、42.5%(差/很差),而右侧 UCLP 的 GOSLON 得分为 8.3%(好/很好)、37.5%(一般)、54.2%(差/很差)。左侧和右侧 UCLP 的 VAS 平均值分别为 53.4(sd 22.5)和 44.6(sd 17.1)。GOSLON和VAS的差异均未达到统计学意义(均为P = .08):从临床角度来看,右侧 UCLP 的牙弓关系结果较差,但这些差异未达到统计学意义。需要使用更大的样本量进行进一步研究,以确定在调查 UCLP 的牙弓关系结果时,侧裂是否是一个重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cleft Laterality Dental Arch Relationship Outcomes for Children with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate in New Zealand.

Objectives: To investigate cleft laterality dental arch relationship outcomes of children with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in New Zealand.

Design: A retrospective nationwide study.

Settings: Virtual 3D orthodontic study models collected prior to undertaking secondary alveolar bone grafting.

Participants: A total of 104 patients with UCLP (L = 80: R = 24).

Outcome measures: Four calibrated assessors used the GOSLON Yardstick and 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to score the randomised models on 2 separate assessment sessions. Weighted Kappa were used to determine the intra/inter-rater reliability for the GOSLON and correlations for the VAS.

Results: Intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.57-0.88 (GOSLON) and 0.45-0.93 (VAS). Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.62-0.86 (GOSLON) and 0.64-0.93 (VAS).GOSLON scores for the left UCLP were 31.2% for good/very good; 26.3% for fair; 42.5% for poor/very poor while the right UCLP scored 8.3% for good/very good; 37.5% for fair; 54.2% for poor/very poor. The mean VAS for left and right UCLP were 53.4 (sd 22.5) and 44.6 (sd 17.1) respectively. Neither the GOSLON nor VAS differences reached statistical significance (both P = .08).

Conclusions: From a clinical perspective right UCLP had worse dental arch relationship outcomes, however, these differences failed to reach statistical significance. Further studies using larger sample sizes are required to determine if cleft laterality is an important consideration when investigating UCLP dental arch outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信