{"title":"[德国的护理学术教育:正规结构的异同]。","authors":"Kai Knapp , Ingrid Darmann-Finck","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2023.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The German Nursing Professions Act establishes a primary qualifying course of studies at universities, which is completed with a bachelor's degree and a vocational qualification as a nurse. The Nursing Professions Act and the Nursing Training and Examination Ordinance open up some possibilities with regard to the study program concept. The present paper examines the question of how the degree programs are formally structured.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A document analysis of the curricula or module manuals of the degree programs existing in December 2022 was conducted, which ultimately included 26 degree programs in the analysis. The module handbooks were analyzed and compared in terms of content using an inductively developed analysis grid.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There are considerable differences between the programs in terms of total duration/total workload, length and rhythm of practical study phase, composition of workload of practical study phase, as well as the extent of university study and the ratio of classroom to self-study.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Due to the high number of validations (20 from 26), the results are meaningful. The findings suggest that it is often less content-related than pragmatic reasons or external constraints that guide the design of the degree programs. From a vocational education and training perspective, too few alternations between practical and academic study phases or very extensive self-study phases could be disadvantageous for the students' acquisition of competencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000047/pdfft?md5=34adfa995262a207abaf4455e366a0b2&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000047-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primärqualifizierende Studiengänge in der Pflege: Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede im formalen Aufbau\",\"authors\":\"Kai Knapp , Ingrid Darmann-Finck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2023.12.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The German Nursing Professions Act establishes a primary qualifying course of studies at universities, which is completed with a bachelor's degree and a vocational qualification as a nurse. The Nursing Professions Act and the Nursing Training and Examination Ordinance open up some possibilities with regard to the study program concept. The present paper examines the question of how the degree programs are formally structured.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A document analysis of the curricula or module manuals of the degree programs existing in December 2022 was conducted, which ultimately included 26 degree programs in the analysis. The module handbooks were analyzed and compared in terms of content using an inductively developed analysis grid.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There are considerable differences between the programs in terms of total duration/total workload, length and rhythm of practical study phase, composition of workload of practical study phase, as well as the extent of university study and the ratio of classroom to self-study.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Due to the high number of validations (20 from 26), the results are meaningful. The findings suggest that it is often less content-related than pragmatic reasons or external constraints that guide the design of the degree programs. From a vocational education and training perspective, too few alternations between practical and academic study phases or very extensive self-study phases could be disadvantageous for the students' acquisition of competencies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000047/pdfft?md5=34adfa995262a207abaf4455e366a0b2&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000047-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000047\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Primärqualifizierende Studiengänge in der Pflege: Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede im formalen Aufbau
Background
The German Nursing Professions Act establishes a primary qualifying course of studies at universities, which is completed with a bachelor's degree and a vocational qualification as a nurse. The Nursing Professions Act and the Nursing Training and Examination Ordinance open up some possibilities with regard to the study program concept. The present paper examines the question of how the degree programs are formally structured.
Methodology
A document analysis of the curricula or module manuals of the degree programs existing in December 2022 was conducted, which ultimately included 26 degree programs in the analysis. The module handbooks were analyzed and compared in terms of content using an inductively developed analysis grid.
Results
There are considerable differences between the programs in terms of total duration/total workload, length and rhythm of practical study phase, composition of workload of practical study phase, as well as the extent of university study and the ratio of classroom to self-study.
Discussion
Due to the high number of validations (20 from 26), the results are meaningful. The findings suggest that it is often less content-related than pragmatic reasons or external constraints that guide the design of the degree programs. From a vocational education and training perspective, too few alternations between practical and academic study phases or very extensive self-study phases could be disadvantageous for the students' acquisition of competencies.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.