华盛顿州金县在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行之前和期间的性传播感染合作伙伴服务成果。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexually transmitted diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001960
Hannah T Fenelon, Anna Berzkalns, Rachel M Amiya, Lindley A Barbee, Julia C Dombrowski, Matthew R Golden, Roxanne P Kerani
{"title":"华盛顿州金县在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行之前和期间的性传播感染合作伙伴服务成果。","authors":"Hannah T Fenelon, Anna Berzkalns, Rachel M Amiya, Lindley A Barbee, Julia C Dombrowski, Matthew R Golden, Roxanne P Kerani","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 pandemic mitigation efforts resulted in reallocation of public health personnel, likely impacting provision of timely sexually transmitted infection partner services (PS). We describe PS outcomes before and during the pandemic in King County, WA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined PS outcomes for syphilis and gonorrhea cases diagnosed in 2019 and 3 periods in 2020 (pre-lockdown: January 1, 2020-March 23, 2020; lockdown: March 24, 2020-June 5, 2020; post-lockdown: June 6, 2020-December 31, 2020). We described changes over time in 3 PS outcomes: cases initiated, interviewed, and with named sex partners. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) with Poisson regression comparing these outcomes in the 2020 periods with 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reported gonorrhea (4611 vs. 4179) and syphilis (665 vs. 586) cases declined from 2019 to 2020. In 2019, 60.7% of cases were initiated, compared with 42.1% before lockdown (aPR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70%-0.78%), 41.7% during lockdown (aPR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.85), and 41.7% after lockdown (aPR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85). Among initiated cases, the proportion interviewed also seemed to drop in the 3 lockdown periods (52.4%, 41.0%, 44.1%) compared with 2019 (55.7%). However, in adjusted analyses, the prevalence of interview among case patients was only lower pre-lockdown (aPR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99), and higher during (aPR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20) and after (aPR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.19). Interviewed patients named partners more often during (21.4%; aPR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.74) and less often after lockdown (16.0%; aPR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.79), compared with 2019 (26.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results underscore the need for a trained public health worker reserve, and plans for deployment of existing workers and prioritization of cases to continue essential sexually transmitted infection public health activities during public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":"445-451"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infection Partner Services Outcomes Before and During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in King County, WA.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah T Fenelon, Anna Berzkalns, Rachel M Amiya, Lindley A Barbee, Julia C Dombrowski, Matthew R Golden, Roxanne P Kerani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 pandemic mitigation efforts resulted in reallocation of public health personnel, likely impacting provision of timely sexually transmitted infection partner services (PS). We describe PS outcomes before and during the pandemic in King County, WA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined PS outcomes for syphilis and gonorrhea cases diagnosed in 2019 and 3 periods in 2020 (pre-lockdown: January 1, 2020-March 23, 2020; lockdown: March 24, 2020-June 5, 2020; post-lockdown: June 6, 2020-December 31, 2020). We described changes over time in 3 PS outcomes: cases initiated, interviewed, and with named sex partners. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) with Poisson regression comparing these outcomes in the 2020 periods with 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reported gonorrhea (4611 vs. 4179) and syphilis (665 vs. 586) cases declined from 2019 to 2020. In 2019, 60.7% of cases were initiated, compared with 42.1% before lockdown (aPR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70%-0.78%), 41.7% during lockdown (aPR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.85), and 41.7% after lockdown (aPR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85). Among initiated cases, the proportion interviewed also seemed to drop in the 3 lockdown periods (52.4%, 41.0%, 44.1%) compared with 2019 (55.7%). However, in adjusted analyses, the prevalence of interview among case patients was only lower pre-lockdown (aPR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99), and higher during (aPR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20) and after (aPR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.19). Interviewed patients named partners more often during (21.4%; aPR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.74) and less often after lockdown (16.0%; aPR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.79), compared with 2019 (26.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results underscore the need for a trained public health worker reserve, and plans for deployment of existing workers and prioritization of cases to continue essential sexually transmitted infection public health activities during public health crises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"445-451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001960\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:SARS-CoV-2大流行的缓解工作导致了公共卫生人员的重新分配,这可能会影响及时提供性传播感染(STI)伙伴服务(PS)。我们描述了华盛顿州金县大流行之前和期间的性传播感染伴侣服务结果:我们研究了 2019 年和 2020 年三个时期(封锁前:1/1/2020-3/23/2020;封锁期间:3/24/2020-6/5/2020)诊断出的梅毒和淋病病例的 PS 结果:3/24/2020-6/5/2020, post-lockdown:6/6/2020-12/31/20).我们描述了三个 PS 结果随时间推移的变化:发起病例、受访病例和有指定性伴侣的病例。我们通过泊松回归计算了调整后的流行率(aPRs),将 2020 年与 2019 年的这些结果进行了比较:从 2019 年到 2020 年,报告的淋病(4611 例对 4179 例)和梅毒(665 例对 586 例)病例有所下降。2019 年,60.7% 的病例是主动报告的,而封锁前为 42.1%(aPR:0.74,95% CI:0.70-0.78%),封锁期间为 41.7%(aPR:0.79;95% CI:0.73-0.85),封锁后为 41.7%(aPR:0.81,95% CI:0.77-0.85)。与 2019 年(55.7%)相比,在三个封锁期(52.4%、41.0%、44.1%),启动个案中的受访比例似乎也有所下降。然而,在调整分析中,病例患者的面谈流行率仅在封锁前有所下降(aPR:0.91;95% CI:0.85-0.99),而在封锁期间(aPR:1.10;95% CI:1.01-1.20)和封锁后(aPR:1.12;95% CI:1.06-1.19)有所上升。与 2019 年(26.6%)相比,接受访谈的患者在封锁期间(21.4%,aPR:1.35; 95% CI:1.05-1.74)和封锁之后(16.0%,aPR:0.63; 95% CI:0.51-0.79)更经常地说出伴侣的名字:这些结果突出表明,有必要建立一支训练有素的公共卫生工作人员后备队伍,并制定计划,部署现有工作人员和确定病例的优先次序,以便在公共卫生危机期间继续开展必要的科技创新公共卫生活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sexually Transmitted Infection Partner Services Outcomes Before and During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in King County, WA.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic mitigation efforts resulted in reallocation of public health personnel, likely impacting provision of timely sexually transmitted infection partner services (PS). We describe PS outcomes before and during the pandemic in King County, WA.

Methods: We examined PS outcomes for syphilis and gonorrhea cases diagnosed in 2019 and 3 periods in 2020 (pre-lockdown: January 1, 2020-March 23, 2020; lockdown: March 24, 2020-June 5, 2020; post-lockdown: June 6, 2020-December 31, 2020). We described changes over time in 3 PS outcomes: cases initiated, interviewed, and with named sex partners. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) with Poisson regression comparing these outcomes in the 2020 periods with 2019.

Results: Reported gonorrhea (4611 vs. 4179) and syphilis (665 vs. 586) cases declined from 2019 to 2020. In 2019, 60.7% of cases were initiated, compared with 42.1% before lockdown (aPR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70%-0.78%), 41.7% during lockdown (aPR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.85), and 41.7% after lockdown (aPR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85). Among initiated cases, the proportion interviewed also seemed to drop in the 3 lockdown periods (52.4%, 41.0%, 44.1%) compared with 2019 (55.7%). However, in adjusted analyses, the prevalence of interview among case patients was only lower pre-lockdown (aPR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99), and higher during (aPR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20) and after (aPR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.19). Interviewed patients named partners more often during (21.4%; aPR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.74) and less often after lockdown (16.0%; aPR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.79), compared with 2019 (26.6%).

Conclusions: These results underscore the need for a trained public health worker reserve, and plans for deployment of existing workers and prioritization of cases to continue essential sexually transmitted infection public health activities during public health crises.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信