Raphaella de Oliveira Migliavacca , Michelle Lavinsky , Olívia Egger de Souza , Eduardo Priesnitz Friedrich , Otávio Augusto Gonçalves Dias Cionek , Leonardo Ferreira Subda , Bárbara Luiza Bernardi
{"title":"改良体外鼻中隔成形术:前瞻性研究","authors":"Raphaella de Oliveira Migliavacca , Michelle Lavinsky , Olívia Egger de Souza , Eduardo Priesnitz Friedrich , Otávio Augusto Gonçalves Dias Cionek , Leonardo Ferreira Subda , Bárbara Luiza Bernardi","doi":"10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate quality-of-life and satisfaction outcomes in patients undergoing the MES using the Portuguese version of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE-p) and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), and also to evaluate the frequency of possible complications of this technique.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single-center prospective study with patients who had the indication for MES, from May 2016 to September 2020 at the Facial Plastic Surgery Clinic of Otolaryngology Department of the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. The primary outcome was the relative postoperative change in NOSE-p. Secondary outcome was the variation in ROE, a validated quality-of-life questionnaire for rhinoplasty patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 31 patients submitted to extracorporeal septorhinoplasty who were evaluated, twenty-seven patients were included. Preoperative and postoperative NOSE-p scale scores were 65.2 ± 29.9 and 23.5 ± 26.7, respectively (mean differences of 42.04; [95% CI 27.35–56.73]; <em>p</em> < 0.0001). Pre and postoperative ROE scores were 38.3 ± 24.3 vs. 67.29 ± 29.7, respectively (mean differences of −29.02; [95% CI −40.5 to −17.5]; <em>p</em> = 0.0001). Residual septal deviation was verified in 2 patients (7.4%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most of the patients submitted to modified extracorporeal septoplasty had a significant improvement in quality of life scores of nasal obstruction, with good aesthetical outcomes and low indices of postoperative complications.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level 3.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49099,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"90 3","pages":"Article 101398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869424000132/pdfft?md5=aefc7e31bfedda6b5288de2ef6f7cec6&pid=1-s2.0-S1808869424000132-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified extracorporeal septoplasty: prospective study\",\"authors\":\"Raphaella de Oliveira Migliavacca , Michelle Lavinsky , Olívia Egger de Souza , Eduardo Priesnitz Friedrich , Otávio Augusto Gonçalves Dias Cionek , Leonardo Ferreira Subda , Bárbara Luiza Bernardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate quality-of-life and satisfaction outcomes in patients undergoing the MES using the Portuguese version of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE-p) and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), and also to evaluate the frequency of possible complications of this technique.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single-center prospective study with patients who had the indication for MES, from May 2016 to September 2020 at the Facial Plastic Surgery Clinic of Otolaryngology Department of the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. The primary outcome was the relative postoperative change in NOSE-p. Secondary outcome was the variation in ROE, a validated quality-of-life questionnaire for rhinoplasty patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 31 patients submitted to extracorporeal septorhinoplasty who were evaluated, twenty-seven patients were included. Preoperative and postoperative NOSE-p scale scores were 65.2 ± 29.9 and 23.5 ± 26.7, respectively (mean differences of 42.04; [95% CI 27.35–56.73]; <em>p</em> < 0.0001). Pre and postoperative ROE scores were 38.3 ± 24.3 vs. 67.29 ± 29.7, respectively (mean differences of −29.02; [95% CI −40.5 to −17.5]; <em>p</em> = 0.0001). Residual septal deviation was verified in 2 patients (7.4%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most of the patients submitted to modified extracorporeal septoplasty had a significant improvement in quality of life scores of nasal obstruction, with good aesthetical outcomes and low indices of postoperative complications.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level 3.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"90 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869424000132/pdfft?md5=aefc7e31bfedda6b5288de2ef6f7cec6&pid=1-s2.0-S1808869424000132-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869424000132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869424000132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在使用葡萄牙语版鼻腔阻塞症状评估(NOSE-p)和鼻整形术效果评估(ROE)评估接受 MES 术的患者的生活质量和满意度,同时评估该技术可能出现的并发症的频率。方法我们于 2016 年 5 月至 2020 年 9 月在阿雷格里港医院耳鼻喉科面部整形诊所对有 MES 适应症的患者进行了一项单中心前瞻性研究。主要结果是术后NOSE-p的相对变化。结果 在接受体外鼻中隔成形术评估的31名患者中,有27名患者接受了评估。术前和术后 NOSE-p 量表评分分别为 65.2 ± 29.9 和 23.5 ± 26.7(平均差异为 42.04;[95% CI 27.35-56.73];P <;0.0001)。术前和术后的 ROE 评分分别为 38.3 ± 24.3 vs. 67.29 ± 29.7(平均差异为 -29.02;[95% CI -40.5 to -17.5];p = 0.0001)。结论大多数接受改良体外鼻中隔成形术的患者的鼻阻塞生活质量评分显著改善,美观效果良好,术后并发症指数较低。
Modified extracorporeal septoplasty: prospective study
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate quality-of-life and satisfaction outcomes in patients undergoing the MES using the Portuguese version of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE-p) and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), and also to evaluate the frequency of possible complications of this technique.
Methods
We conducted a single-center prospective study with patients who had the indication for MES, from May 2016 to September 2020 at the Facial Plastic Surgery Clinic of Otolaryngology Department of the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. The primary outcome was the relative postoperative change in NOSE-p. Secondary outcome was the variation in ROE, a validated quality-of-life questionnaire for rhinoplasty patients.
Results
Of the 31 patients submitted to extracorporeal septorhinoplasty who were evaluated, twenty-seven patients were included. Preoperative and postoperative NOSE-p scale scores were 65.2 ± 29.9 and 23.5 ± 26.7, respectively (mean differences of 42.04; [95% CI 27.35–56.73]; p < 0.0001). Pre and postoperative ROE scores were 38.3 ± 24.3 vs. 67.29 ± 29.7, respectively (mean differences of −29.02; [95% CI −40.5 to −17.5]; p = 0.0001). Residual septal deviation was verified in 2 patients (7.4%).
Conclusion
Most of the patients submitted to modified extracorporeal septoplasty had a significant improvement in quality of life scores of nasal obstruction, with good aesthetical outcomes and low indices of postoperative complications.
期刊介绍:
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology publishes original contributions in otolaryngology and the associated areas (cranio-maxillo-facial surgery and phoniatrics). The aim of this journal is the national and international divulgation of the scientific production interesting to the otolaryngology, as well as the discussion, in editorials, of subjects of scientific, academic and professional relevance.
The Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology is born from the Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, of which it is the English version, created and indexed by MEDLINE in 2005. It is the official scientific publication of the Brazilian Association of Otolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery. Its abbreviated title is Braz J Otorhinolaryngol., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.