政策抹杀的破坏力：州议员和校董会如何在倾向于反 LGBTQ+ 政策的同时，却未能采取跨性别肯定政策

IF 1.6 3区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Policy Pub Date : 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1177/08959048231218206

Mollie T. McQuillan, Benjamin A. Lebovitz, LaShanda Harbin

{"title":"政策抹杀的破坏力：州议员和校董会如何在倾向于反 LGBTQ+ 政策的同时，却未能采取跨性别肯定政策","authors":"Mollie T. McQuillan, Benjamin A. Lebovitz, LaShanda Harbin","doi":"10.1177/08959048231218206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2017, hostile anti-LGBTQ+ educational bills rapidly expanded. Using traditional and critical policy analysis across three Midwestern states, we examine (1) whether state and local policymakers ( n = 60) adopted trans-inclusive protections aligned with the 2017 federal Whitaker ruling, (2) the spread and scope of state and local educational policies concerning LGBTQ+ people, and (3) relationships between LGBTQ and critical race theory (CRT) curricular bills. We find policy erasure in states without pre- Whitaker gender-inclusive nondiscrimination laws and expanded efforts to ban LGBTQ+ students from educational opportunities, spaces, and curriculum. LGBTQ+ and CRT curricular bans overlapped. We discuss the implications of policymakers leaning into exclusion over gender reforms.","PeriodicalId":47728,"journal":{"name":"Educational Policy","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Disruptive Power of Policy Erasure: How State Legislators and School Boards Fail to Take up Trans-affirming Policies While Leaning into Anti-LGBTQ+ Policies\",\"authors\":\"Mollie T. McQuillan, Benjamin A. Lebovitz, LaShanda Harbin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08959048231218206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 2017, hostile anti-LGBTQ+ educational bills rapidly expanded. Using traditional and critical policy analysis across three Midwestern states, we examine (1) whether state and local policymakers ( n = 60) adopted trans-inclusive protections aligned with the 2017 federal Whitaker ruling, (2) the spread and scope of state and local educational policies concerning LGBTQ+ people, and (3) relationships between LGBTQ and critical race theory (CRT) curricular bills. We find policy erasure in states without pre- Whitaker gender-inclusive nondiscrimination laws and expanded efforts to ban LGBTQ+ students from educational opportunities, spaces, and curriculum. LGBTQ+ and CRT curricular bans overlapped. We discuss the implications of policymakers leaning into exclusion over gender reforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Policy\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048231218206\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048231218206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2017 年以来，敌意的反 LGBTQ+ 教育法案迅速扩张。通过对中西部三个州进行传统和批判性政策分析，我们考察了（1）州和地方决策者（n = 60）是否采取了与 2017 年联邦惠特克案裁决一致的跨性别包容性保护措施，（2）州和地方有关 LGBTQ+ 人士的教育政策的传播和范围，以及（3）LGBTQ 与批判性种族理论（CRT）课程法案之间的关系。我们发现，在惠特克案之前没有性别包容性非歧视法律的州，政策受到了侵蚀，而禁止 LGBTQ+ 学生参与教育机会、空间和课程的努力却在扩大。LGBTQ+ 与 CRT 课程禁令重叠。我们讨论了政策制定者倾向于排斥而非性别改革的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Disruptive Power of Policy Erasure: How State Legislators and School Boards Fail to Take up Trans-affirming Policies While Leaning into Anti-LGBTQ+ Policies

Since 2017, hostile anti-LGBTQ+ educational bills rapidly expanded. Using traditional and critical policy analysis across three Midwestern states, we examine (1) whether state and local policymakers ( n = 60) adopted trans-inclusive protections aligned with the 2017 federal Whitaker ruling, (2) the spread and scope of state and local educational policies concerning LGBTQ+ people, and (3) relationships between LGBTQ and critical race theory (CRT) curricular bills. We find policy erasure in states without pre- Whitaker gender-inclusive nondiscrimination laws and expanded efforts to ban LGBTQ+ students from educational opportunities, spaces, and curriculum. LGBTQ+ and CRT curricular bans overlapped. We discuss the implications of policymakers leaning into exclusion over gender reforms.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Educational Policy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Educational Policy provides an interdisciplinary forum for improving education in primary and secondary schools, as well as in high education and non school settings. Educational Policy blends the best of educational research with the world of practice, making it valuable resource for educators, policy makers, administrators, researchers, teachers, and graduate students. Educational Policy is concerned with the practical consequences of policy decisions and alternatives. It examines the relationship between educational policy and educational practice, and sheds new light on important debates and controversies within the field. You"ll find that Educational Policy is an insightful compilation of ideas, strategies, and analyses for improving our educational systems.