打破关于英国和澳大利亚避难所倡议的二元思维：从德里达对敌对性的分析中得到的启示

IF 4 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Critical Studies in Education Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1080/17508487.2024.2314127

Rebecca Murray, Sally Baker

引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管英国和澳大利亚在地理上相距遥远，但两国敌对的移民政策和有管理的移民做法却如影随形。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Disrupting binary thinking about sanctuary initiatives in the UK and Australia: insights from a Derridean analysis of hostipitality

Despite their geographical distance, the UK and Australia share proximity with their hostile immigration policies and managed migration practices, characterised by inhumanity under the guise of det...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Critical Studies in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

10.10

自引率

5.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Studies in Education is one of the few international journals devoted to a critical sociology of education, although it welcomes submissions with a critical stance that draw on other disciplines (e.g. philosophy, social geography, history) in order to understand ''the social''. Two interests frame the journal’s critical approach to research: (1) who benefits (and who does not) from current and historical social arrangements in education and, (2) from the standpoint of the least advantaged, what can be done about inequitable arrangements. Informed by this approach, articles published in the journal draw on post-structural, feminist, postcolonial and other critical orientations to critique education systems and to identify alternatives for education policy, practice and research.