快讯长征:探索有效的基于文本的勘探和开发指标

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Nazlihan Ugur, Rene Belderbos, Stijn Kelchtermans, Bart Leten
{"title":"快讯长征:探索有效的基于文本的勘探和开发指标","authors":"Nazlihan Ugur, Rene Belderbos, Stijn Kelchtermans, Bart Leten","doi":"10.1177/14761270241231724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since March (1991) outlined the importance of balancing exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, the exploration-exploitation paradigm has received substantial attention in the management literature. Recent studies have used computer-aided text analysis (CATA) to construct measures of firms’ inclination towards exploration or exploitation, using the original set of keywords proposed by March. We propose a structured series of tests to assess the validity of CATA-based measures and demonstrate that the approach used in prior studies is unlikely to deliver valid indicators. We show that an alternative approach, which relies on a larger library of keywords including synonyms of the March keywords and selects only those keywords that are informative and that pass validity tests, delivers valid CATA indicators – both for unstructured (news articles) and structured text bases (annual reports). Our study contributes to the literature on construct validity and has broader implications for the development of CATA-based indicators in strategy and organization research.Keywords: exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity, content analysis, computer-aided text analysis (CATA), firm performance","PeriodicalId":22087,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Organization","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: The Long March: The Quest for Valid Text-Based Indicators of Exploration and Exploitation\",\"authors\":\"Nazlihan Ugur, Rene Belderbos, Stijn Kelchtermans, Bart Leten\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14761270241231724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since March (1991) outlined the importance of balancing exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, the exploration-exploitation paradigm has received substantial attention in the management literature. Recent studies have used computer-aided text analysis (CATA) to construct measures of firms’ inclination towards exploration or exploitation, using the original set of keywords proposed by March. We propose a structured series of tests to assess the validity of CATA-based measures and demonstrate that the approach used in prior studies is unlikely to deliver valid indicators. We show that an alternative approach, which relies on a larger library of keywords including synonyms of the March keywords and selects only those keywords that are informative and that pass validity tests, delivers valid CATA indicators – both for unstructured (news articles) and structured text bases (annual reports). Our study contributes to the literature on construct validity and has broader implications for the development of CATA-based indicators in strategy and organization research.Keywords: exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity, content analysis, computer-aided text analysis (CATA), firm performance\",\"PeriodicalId\":22087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Organization\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270241231724\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270241231724","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 March(1991 年)概述了在组织学习中平衡探索与利用的重要性以来,探索-利用范式在管理文献中受到了广泛关注。最近的研究使用计算机辅助文本分析(CATA),利用马奇最初提出的一系列关键词,构建了衡量企业探索或利用倾向的指标。我们提出了一系列结构化测试来评估基于 CATA 的测量方法的有效性,并证明之前研究中使用的方法不太可能提供有效的指标。我们表明,另一种方法依赖于更大的关键词库,其中包括马奇关键词的同义词,并且只选择那些信息量大且通过有效性测试的关键词,这种方法可以提供有效的 CATA 指标--既适用于非结构化文本(新闻文章),也适用于结构化文本库(年度报告)。我们的研究为构建有效性方面的文献做出了贡献,并对在战略和组织研究中开发基于 CATA 的指标具有更广泛的意义。 关键词:探索、利用、灵活性、内容分析、计算机辅助文本分析(CATA)、公司绩效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPRESS: The Long March: The Quest for Valid Text-Based Indicators of Exploration and Exploitation
Since March (1991) outlined the importance of balancing exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, the exploration-exploitation paradigm has received substantial attention in the management literature. Recent studies have used computer-aided text analysis (CATA) to construct measures of firms’ inclination towards exploration or exploitation, using the original set of keywords proposed by March. We propose a structured series of tests to assess the validity of CATA-based measures and demonstrate that the approach used in prior studies is unlikely to deliver valid indicators. We show that an alternative approach, which relies on a larger library of keywords including synonyms of the March keywords and selects only those keywords that are informative and that pass validity tests, delivers valid CATA indicators – both for unstructured (news articles) and structured text bases (annual reports). Our study contributes to the literature on construct validity and has broader implications for the development of CATA-based indicators in strategy and organization research.Keywords: exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity, content analysis, computer-aided text analysis (CATA), firm performance
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.20%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Strategic Organization is devoted to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed, discipline-grounded conceptual and empirical research of interest to researchers, teachers, students, and practitioners of strategic management and organization. The journal also aims to be of considerable interest to senior managers in government, industry, and particularly the growing management consulting industry. Strategic Organization provides an international, interdisciplinary forum designed to improve our understanding of the interrelated dynamics of strategic and organizational processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信